>>61102568 (OP)
use your brain
put yourself in the following shoes
you’re about to shift the financial system into an ultra-efficient god like protocol not seen or ever possible in human history
you know that you’re essentially king making yourself and there will be outcry with this approach
you purposely let the public in, but need them to only be a tiny sliver of the actual protocol holders when the time comes to go full out
you need even the most emboldened in the public to let go of their holdings
you still get to keep your free market narrative
now add it up: when would you let this rip? you obviously wouldn’t after great news. you want the holders to get used to “great news” and believe there will be no price reactions. you want to drain them.
use your brain, how many more news cycles without price action would it take for you to break?
that’s your answer
that’s the moment it’ll rip
#1 MCAP
btw. just to prove to you I’m in the know I’ll drop you something no one else knows:
there is an internal project pending name LINKHub. It’s a chain, but all it does is custody LINK. There are no smart contracts.
This is being prepared to decouple risk from ETH being the native ledger for LINK. The same nodes for the oracle network will secure LINKHub. This is a project that will secure LINK for the future envisioned where it will become a #1 MCAP on the crypto charts. Can’t do that while bound to ETH as the base.
There will be easy adapters to move LINK from any chain to LINKHub (name pending).