Thread 61146529

>Basic Information
>gme.cac site redacted due to aids
https://finra-markets.morningstar.com/MarketData/EquityOptions/detail.jsp?query=14%3A0P000002CH
https://gmetimeline.com (up to 2021)

>Daily reminder
s[Kek Melvies]bzilp4

>Mandatory study time
>The Everything Short
reddit.com/mgucv2
>^watch-along
youtu.be/AaalT8rn9lc
>Naked Short Selling and Systemic Risk
youtu.be/FCiL4v7_z9E
>Failure to deliver
youtu.be/I0WXg5T3cBE

>GameStop Investor Site
>SEC 10-K Annual report FY24 & '25 Proxy Statement
news.gamestop.com/annual-meeting/

>What will happen if Citadel becomes insolvent?
DTCC with 60T USD, will pay as the final boss with FDIC as the insurance

>Real-Time Trades
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/GME/latest-real-time-trades
https://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch/gotoBL/fidelityTopOrders.jhtml
>Current Trade Halts + Short Restrictions
nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=TradeHalts
nyse.com/markets/nyse-arca/notices

>All other news/DDs/etc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stag_hunt
https://prospect.org/power/how-the-gamestop-hustle-worked
https://computershared.net/?bot=drsbot
DRS Guide:
reddit.com/ptvaka
Avoid DSPP (more information under legacy links):
sec.gov/about/reports-publications/investor-publications/holding-your-securities-get-the-facts
HF/broker class action lawsuit evidence:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.590042/gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.416.0.pdf
SEC GME/meme stocks report:
sec.gov/files/staff-report-equity-options-market-struction-conditions-early-2021.pdf

DD Compilation:
reddit.com/mnss65
Quarterly Movements, Equity Total Return Swaps, DOOMPs, ITM CALLs, Short Interest, and Futures Roll Periods:
reddit.com/pb22oj
Cellar Boxing:
reddit.com/pmj9yk

>Temporary alliance with reddit and Jaws to take down other sharks, we can go back to hating each other later
>reddit DDs don't take them for fact use your brain
>Check your broker and clearing house to ensure you're not rugpulled

Last time on /GME/: >>61136384

As always:
>sneed hedgies

>>61146529 (OP)
Still comfy waitin' and holdin'.

>Summary

GameStop Info
>Complete corporate revamp by Ryan Cohen
>Debt free with positive increases and reductions (see ER); $8.7 B cash and cash equivalents on hand + high inventory

DRS & Computershare
>~66.7 million shares of ~447.7: 15% total held by Sep 5, 2025
>~68.1/~447.3: 15% 6/5, ~69.5/~447.08: 16% 3/19
>~71.0/~446.8: 16% Dec 4, 2024
>~72.8/~426.5: 17% 9/4, ~74.6/~351: 21% 6/5
>
>~75.3 of ~305 25% by Mar 20, 2024,
>~75.4 by Nov 30, 2023, ~75.4 8/31, ~76.6 6/1, ~76.0 3/22 Vs Cede & Co
>
>Previously 71.8 (17.95) M shares DRS'd by Oct 29, 2022, 71.3 by 7/30,
>12.7 of ~77 by 4/30, 8.9 by 1/29
>and 5.2 by Oct. 30 2021

Unfuddable
>Shorts never closed and there exists more fakes than real shares
>'MOASS' is a matter of time

Further information can found by reading the OP or DYOR!
Reply to this pasta for any confusion.

WGAMI!

Other news/reminders:
Wednesday RRP: 5.484B, 20P 0.2742B per
Thursday RRP: 6.960B, 11P = 0.633B per (roughly)
Friday RRP: 4.102B, 6P = 0.684B per (roughly)

Investor site links to SEC for old filings
>4-for-1 Stock Split Form of stock dividend (Rec: Jul 18, 2022; Dist. 21st AH)
See 2022-07-06 8-K
>Q2 25 8-K/10-Q
>Warrants expire Oct 30 2026 (site also has FAQ)
See 2025-09-09
>Proxy Statement: Stock given in comp issued as RSUs that vest in quarterly increments over 4 years.
>798 pg SEC doc confessions of FIs/MMs/HFs/DCEs/Swaps Counterparties etc on short selling transparency
sec.gov/comments/s7-11-23/s71123-typec.pdf

>100 page comparison DD
https://pdfhost.io/v/05TEEk3U6_MOV_GME_Comparison_Doc

>Legacy links
wallet.gamestop.com
nft.gamestop.com
www.gmedd.com/report-model (Nov 2021)
>Use archives
Avoid DSPP:
reddit.com/r/DRSyourGME/comments/12pfm9s/
>GME shorted percentage of float as of Jan 15th, 2021: 226.42%
www.rosenlegal.com/media/casestudy/2289_Robinhood%20-%20Initial%20Complaint%20-%20Market%20Manipulation%204835-8623-1514%20v.2.pdf

Please don't feed spammers and sliders.

Inside jannies gave me another 3 for free for solving the puzzle so now I'm going to fuck their shit up out of autism and spite. This is the information they're trying to suppress by any means necessary:

>Evidence #1:
3 for free because I provided sources proving that unique 6 digit CUSIP identifiers are never reused for equities including warrants:

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61044541#p61047966

>Evidence #2:
3 for free because I pieced together what's happening before it happens. Note that this was in the designated shitting street. It didn't matter. They do not want individual investors identifying and choosing to take advantage of this opportunity to slurp at the low:

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61059267#p61117012

>Evidence #3
Consensus constable brings up the old man unprompted to say that he definitely isn't involved:

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61111676#p61123531

>Evidence #4
Consensus constable encourage filtering of the name of the blockchain securities exchange:

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60990527#p60997046

GME will never have price discovery until it relists on the blockchain securities exchange. GME will not list on the blockchain securities exchange until the other company spins off the blockchain securities exchange as suggested by the chairman of the other company in a letter to the board of the blockchain securities exchange (the CEO of the blockchain securities exchange, an insider for ICE, was later removed at the request of the chairman):

https://x.com/marcuslemonis/status/1947353501635379682

The other company will not spin off the blockchain securities exchange until the merger with the bankrupt company to preserve the $1.6 billion NOL (which is proven by the CUSIP-6 smoking gun) is complete. Shareholders of the bankrupt company will receive shares in the other company per IRS Code Section 368(a)(2)(E) which requires 80% of bankrupt voting shares to be exchanged for other shares in order to make it a tax free acquisition.

>>61146596
>Other company CUSIP 6
690370
>Bankrupt company CUSIP 6
075896
>Other company warrant CUSIP
075896159

If the two weren't merging, then the warrants for the other company would use 690370 for the first 6 digits of the warrant CUSIP. It is not possible for the warrants of the other company to use the CUSIP 6 of the bankrupt company unless the two are merging, per CUSIP Global Securities.

GME must drop below $22. That is inevitable. This will be the start of the dip.
GME will drop below $21. That is a great time to buy.
GME should drop below $20. Now, deep value buys are possible.
GME can drop below $19.50. At this point, extremely deep value is reached.
GME could drop below $19. Deep Fucking Value.
GME may drop below $18.50. However, such a steep drop will not last long.
GME might drop below $18. Should such events occur, they could happen in very short timeframes and outside of regular trading hours.
It is unlikely that GME is dropping below $17.50. This is around the assumed book value of the company, if you have confidence the price of GME will go above $32 at some point before November 2026.
It is extremely unlikely that GME is dropping below $17. A volatile stock with excellent management will not drop under the value of the company that has loaned 4 billion dollars at zero interest.
It is impossible that GME is dropping below $15. At that point, Ryan Cohen and the board will already have approved and begun a massive operation to buyback shares of the company for billions of dollars.

Book value per share is $11.56
Book value per share is $15.79 - when you assume all the bond debt is converted, thus increasing the issued shares and evaporating 4.16 billion of debt
Book value per share is $15.79 - when you assume all the bond debt is converted, thus increasing the issued shares by 143.6M and evaporating 4.16 billion of long-term debt
Book value per share is $17.27 - when you assume all the bond debt is converted and all warrants are exercised, thus increasing the issued shares by 143.6M + 59.2M, evaporating 4.16 billion of long-term debt and raising 1.89 billion cash from the exercised warrants

If the stock price is sustained at $32 for a longer time, a book value of $17.27 is guaranteed and should the price drop below that level Ryan Cohen can use cash to start buying back stock without any risk.

How does the OP bake threads with millisecond precision as the thread is falling off onto page 11?

Why has the same secure tripcode baked threads for over 4.5 years and swarms of bots and shills claim any different thread is fake?

>>61145800
checkin the dirtiest, fap inducing chart ive seen in 2 years.

Satan, I condemn you! In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, I send you away. I pray to the King of kings to bless all of us with prosperity and wisdom for us and our families.

GME to $250

Jesus is King

>>61146666
Checked.

>>61146627
I rue the day you glowgoniggers became bbby enthusiasts.

>>61146666
Devilishly checked

>>61146533
Last week:
Monday RRP: 21.776B, 19P = 1.146B per (roughly)
Tuesday RRP: 4.622B, 16P = 0.288875B per
Wednesday RRP: 5.231B, 12P 0.436B per (roughly)
Thursday RRP: 4.496B, 10P = 0.4496B per
Friday RRP: 4.124B, 10P = 0.4124B per

>This week:
Monday RRP: No
Tuesday RRP: 3.516B, 7P = 0.502B per (roughly)
Wednesday RRP: 5.484B, 20P 0.2742B per
Thursday RRP: 6.960B, 11P = 0.633B per (roughly)
Friday RRP: 4.102B, 6P = 0.684B per (roughly)

N
I
N
T
E
N
D
O

>>61146596
>>61146600
Great work anon. It's really quite obvious at this point. You would think GME investors would be intrigued but they appear to only pretending to be GME investors. They lash out like vipers as if they are personally injured. They cannot be reasoned with. They appear to shills who masquerade as GME investors trying control the narrative.
They can't filter it, they can't ignore it. They ATTACK.

>>61146778
>You would think GME investors would be intrigued
Okay. Find me a company that issued warrants under their new CUSIP structure, after it changed their ticker to a ticker that was previously used by a now-bankrupt company. With sources please.

>>61146852
Are you saying this is normal?

>>61146865
Yes given the circumstances of the company recently having changed their ticker from OSTK to BYON to BBBY.

so anyways, i like GameStop. all other stocks suck.

Any occult practitioners here who have seen $GME's future?

>>61147012
I cracked open a few fortune cookies and they said something about good fortune
Hope this helps

Why is rc too much of a pussy to press the moass button? Not enough billions dilooted yet?

Inside jannies banned x+FRvYFC again for >>61146596 discussing GME in the GME thread. The post was specifically about when and how GME will finally have price discovery and provided receipts for jannie abuse, corporate restructuring, and the path to GME price discovery.

Streisand effect, you idiots. The archives are forever.

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61146529#p61146596

>>61147150
It was bag bath schizo delusion.

>>61146666
thanks, super satan. regular satan can suck it.

>>61146852
>Find me a company that issued warrants under their new CUSIP structure, after it changed their ticker to a ticker that was previously used by a now-bankrupt company
Still waiting. CUSIP Teddy BUTTFQ schizo bullshit, debunked!

>>61147218
It's debunked?

bbby fags make me want to buy more gme

>>61147245
They get upset when you talk about buying gme, or if you talk about GameStop itself.

>>61147245
Thjs. Every time they spam their off topic, bankrupt, company, I want to buy more GME.

>>61147245
>>61147258
>>61147313
Based. I too love buying GME. Pretty much the best stock out there.

>>61147245
as opposed to what? Buying BBBY? LMAO. Pool is closed nigger.

>>61147206
Everything in that post was a factual statement backed up with evidence save for the speculation of GME relisting to unlock price discovery.

>>61147218
Addressed in the post the jannies deleted. A ticker is a market-facing human-readable code for trading convenience. CUSIPs are back-end unique identifiers intended to track securities with precision. The company that manages all CUSIPs—CUSIP Global Securities—says that CUSIP identifiers are never reused even when a company changes the name and ticker. The banned poster provided proof. The CUSIP for the equity didn’t change either so your argument is stupid. They simply issued warrants with a CUSIP registered to another company which only happens in a merger. You’re essentially saying that the CUSIP should change when a company gets a new CEO. It’s a retarded non sequitur with no evidence to support it, while the post that refutes your argument was deleted out of sheer panic.

>>61147245
So buy more. You won’t because you own none. In fact you or your employer owe quite a lot of GME.

>>61147258
Obviously the only people getting upset are the ones trying to subvert the threads by controlling GME discussion and banning posters for discussing GME and things related to GME in the GME thread.

>>61147345
Careful. You’re disrupting their narrative.

This psyop is so transparent. No GME regular is falling for it. The only reason they do it is to prevent lurkers from catching on. This isn’t going away you retards. When you ban posters for posting factual information related to the topic being discussed you give away the whole game. This isn’t Reddit.

>>61147410
>Addressed in the post the jannies deleted. A ticker is a market-facing human-readable code for trading convenience. CUSIPs are back-end unique identifiers intended to track securities with precision. The company that manages all CUSIPs—CUSIP Global Securities—says that CUSIP identifiers are never reused even when a company changes the name and ticker. The banned poster provided proof. The CUSIP for the equity didn’t change either so your argument is stupid. They simply issued warrants with a CUSIP registered to another company which only happens in a merger. You’re essentially saying that the CUSIP should change when a company gets a new CEO. It’s a retarded non sequitur with no evidence to support it, while the post that refutes your argument was deleted out of sheer panic.
Post CUSIPS of companies that changed their ticker and issued warrants within 5 years.

>>61146778
The fact is that most gme holders are either bbby neutral or fellow bathtards. These threads are policed by a small outspoken group of gatekeepers who seek to manufacture consensus around the idea that bbby discussion and community should be segregated from GameStop, despite every indication otherwise. That's why they hate the word disingenuous. It reveals their entire plot. I believe that some of these gatekeepers may be bona fide gme holders who rally against bbby discussion like a monkey taught to teach other monkeys not to grab bananas, even though he himself does not understand why.

>>61146666 checked
>$250
that's way too low Satan. Wake me up when GME is $10,000+

>>61147430
Your company is bankrupt and you are never getting your money back.

>>61147423
The company that manages the CUSIPs literally says it doesn’t matter. Do you think this pilpul is persuasive? No one is falling for your attempt at redirection. You’re so desperate to cover this up.

I think the banned poster was right. You only get this level of pushback when parties with vested interests stand to lose money and/or power if they lose control of the narrative. GME is going to relist and then we will be free.The banned poster laid out a timeline. What really scares you is the prospect of investors sniffing out this trade before the announcement is made public. That’s the only logical explanation for this category 5 crynado.

>>61147430
If the banned poster is right there is currently an opportunity to do the equivalent of slurping GME in 2019. That’s some deep value. No wonder they try so hard to keep it under wraps. But the tighter they squeeze their fist the more it slips through their fingers. Streisand effect.

>>61147468
This is (you) while accusing others of what you are doing. I think Marx is who said accuse your opponent of what you're doing. So you by definition Haye GME, yet are posting here. Curious.

assigned puts at fidelity and the warrants that came with the puts shows up as a seperate purchase transaction with a cost basis of 12 per warrant. Looks like 5.99 was the ath for warrants on the chart. I better buy more gamestop

I think the worst part of the discourse of the bbbyfag saga is that they argue like liberals. It always, always becomes "no u" and they simply never acknowledge points where they are 100% proven incorrect or disingenuous. I mean they even think "disingenuous" is a dog whistle. It's all so tiresome, just give me my fucking money.

>>61147514
Post GME position with handwritten time-stamped note (you won’t).

I don’t know why you people think you have any chance of psyopping autists on 4chinz. You really got lazy with boomers and television.

The price of GME has been successfully pinned indefinitely by abusing the ETF creation/redemption process and strategic FTDs. The internet hive mind figured this out. Even the warrants were put in ETFs to manufacture liquidity. The only thing that can break this stalemate is a corporate action taken to improve business fundamentals which will also happen to force reconciliation of the ledger. This is clearly GME relisting on the blockchain which is why that poster was banned. You want to redirect all retail capital into something that you can contain because if investors begin to investigate and decide to invest in something that you cant’t contain, you’re fucked even sooner than you’re already fucked. The banned poster proved the merger using information provided by the company that manages all CUSIPs. You are panicking because that information is currently actionable and it is organically breaking free from containment.

Meanwhile the redditors are putting their brokers on conference call with Computershare so they can DRS their warrants. You’re surrounded on all sides and Steiner’s counterattack isn’t coming. Why don’t you just fake your death and move to another country already?

>61147582
>Transparent 1PBTID shows up to attempt to manufacture consensus.
It’s all so tiresome. How about you refute the banned poster (you won’t) by addressing the details of what they posted?

It seems to me like you’re arguing even though you’re both seemingly in agreement. I don’t get it.

>>61147714
I might have misread and jumped the gun. Apolocheese if so.

>>61147582
Yeah. I would call the argument style not woman like, but Jewish. It's too mentally ill and scatterbrained to be a woman. Women would get mad and cry before this point. Only a Jew would be so focused on compacting so many lies into paragraph spam.
>quit spamming not GME
>OH YEAH BUT HOW MUCH GME DO YOU OWN?!
Actual mental illness on display.

>Succinct summation of how the price of GME is contained is actually paragraph spam
>No I will not address the substance of anything you say
>Also you’re a Jew
You do not blend in.

Maxipads coming unhinged while they literally PLEAD with us to stop talking about RC's broader theme. They literally can't stop talking about it! They sit around and talk to each other about how offended they are? What in the world is going on here?

GME to $27
Wow that was hard.
Your general thread is useless.

>>61147774
GME to $2700

>>61147410
Thanks, bought more GME. Nobody thinks the dead canceled stock is coming back, you are a shill trying to derail GME discussion and associate GME with schizo bagholders.

>>61147767
There’s nothing wrong with only buying GME. What’s abnormal is the shit flinging to shut down organic discussion touching on one very specific thing. Occam’s Razor says the banned poster is right. The complainers haven’t addressed the specifics of anything they said which is how you know it’s a containment op.

I don't think anything is going to happen in the GME-space until the BBBY CH11 comes to a resolution. I think RC is all tied up and wants that loose end completed before we hear much more out of him or GME. Thoughts?

>>61147767
They simply cannot filter. They’ll say it’s because they feel a righteous need to stop any and all discussion as it will be used by the authorities/hedgies to accuse us of manipulation but when someone reminds them that they would only be able to do that by admitting that they themselves committed a criminal act it gets hand waved away. The logic is patently absurd that one can’t help but question their intentions.

>>61147795
>Thoughts?
That you should discuss that in the general about BBBY.

>>61147796
>you're a criminal if you only want to discuss GME in the GME thread
You lost. Pay up.

>>61147841
Did you even read that post?

>>61147789
This camouflage doesn’t work. Buy as much GME as you want (you won’t) and then post your haul with a handwritten time-stamped note (you won’t). Nobody is falling for this act.

>>61147795
>>61147796
They banned a poster for talking about GME in the GME thread and previously for talking about bankruptcy in the bankruptcy thread. It could not be more obvious that the banned poster figured it out. None of the cry posters ITT have addressed a single thing that the banned poster said. It’s all just the same regurgitated talking points and rhetorical tricks.

>>61147836
The poster that was banned in this thread was also banned in that thread for doing exactly that. Your team is obviously panicking and desperate to keep a lid on this information. You used too heavy a hand and now the Streisand effect is taking care of the rest. Didn’t you ever watch that show with the horny midget? Cut out a man’s tongue and you don’t prove him wrong, you only prove that you fear what he has to say.

>>61147869
>team
No, use the dedicated BBBY general to discuss BBBY.

I knew it when I saw how angry they got when “it’s gonna get real awkward in here” was introduced

>>61147734
It's both anon, it's Jewish women.

If they just filtered them and didn’t engage it wouldn’t be an issue. Why can’t they filter them like everyone else who doesn’t agree with them?

>>61147895
Very possible lol. Definitely a new anti-GME team got put on rotation after the warrant announcement. Associating GME with BBBYQ is their last attempt to frame GME holders as criminals.

Then they beg us to filter them, because they want the appearance of consensus lol.

>61147899
>just filter them
that's the jannie's job, not mine.
the fact that the same spam shitters are unopposed and allowed to spread their bullshit is proof that the jannies are compromised.

>>61147921
How does that change the points being expressed? You love beating on straw men instead disputing the points being made. The justification being used to not filter the bbby does not hold water and you think you continually using it is helping your case but it only makes you more suspicious.

We could make it happen you know

>>61147877
I am talking about GME in the GME thread. Specifically how the price of GME is contained indefinitely by abusing strategic FTDs and the ETF creation/redemption process, how even the warrants were put in ETFs, how the only thing that can break this statement is corporate action to improve company fundamentals while simultaneously forcing share reconciliation, how a poster ITT was banned for discussing GME relisting on the blockchain, how that poster was banned even in your containment thread for discussing the details of what that looks like and the rise of operations, how that poster brought receipts proving everything they said, and how you and your team have refused to address the facts of anything they said which makes it obvious that you are running a containment operation because you fear this information spreading.

You are not talking about GME in the GME thread. All of your posts are off topic meta trying to contain information discussed in the GME thread. Nobody is falling for it and the more you post the more obvious it becomes. Your efforts are counterproductive to your goal.

I don’t know how you retards could be this bad at your job. All you have to do is ignore the posts that you want hidden and slide the thread with nostalgic comfyposting, but you can’t do that any more than you can filter. It’s like how your bosses spent the last 4 years telling everybody to forget GameStop. All you had to do was shut the fuck up.

>>61147921
Jannies banned a poster for talking about what you don’t want talked about and you say the jannies aren’t on your side? It’s not the jannies job to manage discussion. Only someone running a containment operation would say something that stupid.

>>61147936
>disputing the points being made.
Post it in the BBBY general if you want to argue about BBBY.

>>61147941
>I am talking about GME in the GME thread
No you're not. You're talking about BBBY.

>>61147916
>Definitely a new anti-GME team
No towel kong ever kekked my bags.

>>61147936
They will not address anything being said because they are running a containment operation.

>>61147947
Thank you Barbara Streisand for continuing to lie in the most obvious way possible.

I just want to know if any of you GME chads know if RC has anything to do with BBBY issuing warrants with BBBYQ's CUSIP? I ask a simple question and I get viciously attacked for absolutely no reason. Are they doing it "for the lulz"???

>>61147939
Nah. This is a company that deserves to die.
Luv me Gamestop, 'ate me fake meat.

>>61147973
>know if any of you GME chads know if RC has anything to do with BBBY issuing warrants with BBBYQ's CUSIP?
I can answer that. He has exactly zero input into it.

>>61147973
I don’t think anyone knows desu fren. Whether you believe the towel schizophrenia or are vehemently against it. Either way it’s certainly interesting how it’s developing. Not sure why it cause this much emotional distress to point out that it’s interesting.

>>61148017
That's so weird though! Why is GME's CEO involved in BBBYQ's CH11 bankruptcy? Does he have nothing to do with that also?

>>61147939
>we
>cause illegal short squeeze
fuck off. jannie should ban you for suggesting something illegal and doing it in the /gme/ thread of all places. fuck off.

>>61148027
>That's so weird though
No, he is not involved in BBBY so that's entirely normal. You can find more information in the BBBY general about RC's involvement with BBBY in the dedicated general for the stock.

>>61148027
>Why is GME's CEO involved in BBBYQ's CH11 bankruptcy? Does he have nothing to do with that also?
Them dodging these questions. Kek

>>61148054
But he is involved in their chapter 11? He’s listed as a creditor.

>>61148079
>But he is involved in their chapter 11? He’s listed as a creditor
Damn, BBBY owes Ryan money? Hope they can pay him. Perhaps former equity holders can discuss how they'll get the cash they owe him in the BBBY general

>>61148054
Oh, I thought his name showed up on some BBBYQ CH11 dockets just like a month ago. Thanks for the input.
I also heard that Overstock bought BBBY IP and actually opened up Bed Bath and Beyond stores and are even using the ticker now. They issued warrants using the same CUSIP as the old BBBYQ. Do you think RC has anything to do with that either?
I appreciate you answering my questions here. You just seem to know so much about what is going on and you answer so quickly I might as just ask any followups here.
Do you know RC personally?

>>61148064
>dodging these questions
What question? The former BBBY owes RC cash. End of story.

>>61148092
Damn, wrong thread buddy. That's a lot of text to go repost in the BBBY general.

BBBY kings. Get ready to enjoy the biggest “told you so” in history. $500 a share is not beyond the realm of possibility.

>>61148098
How would they owe him cash? I thought he sold and walked away when the board was colluding with JP Morgan consultants to cellar box BBBY. It seems so mysterious for him to show up out of the blue. It's really quite exciting to see the CEO of GME still involved. Could this be the M&A target GME quarterly statements have been hinting at? It seems like a long shot, but this is what it looks like to me?
I thought the CEO of GME offered $400M for BBBYQ. How did Overstock buy it all for $20m?

>>61148124
why do you niggers shit up the wrong thread 24/7? makes me buy more gamestop

>>61148124
How dare you post a smug image?

>>61148124
PROOF? SOURCE? EVIDENCE?

>>61148128
>How would they owe him cash?
Because he evidently loaned them cash. Somthing that should be discussed in the BBBY general as poor RC has been defrauded by the former BBBY.

>>61148143
I posted a smiling dog

>>61148124
That's a really high number. If the BBBYQ investors get $500 per share, won't it be the shorts needing to cover who will have to pay for this shortage? That will help GME and their naked short selling problem, would it not?
Man, that would be awesome! I am definitely going to keep following the BBBYQ CH11 case because this seems to be like THE big one we are all waiting for.
It sure is nice to know that it is not just the GME shareholders who are getting attacked by short sellers. We have many great friends and allies in the Towel-Team.

>>61148150
Reeeeeeee

>>61148151
Exactly fren

>>61148054
>no he is not involved
>you can learn how he is involved in the bbby general
I suppose mental whiplash would require a brain and spine. I see now why you are immune.

>>61148182
I only own GME. I just think it's interesting that GME has been talking about M&A and he is showing up as a creditor after two years time in the BBBY CH11. After seeing BBBYQ's CUSIP show up on warrants that were issued the exact same day as GME's warrants, it's safe to assume this is what he is buying, right? RC is a billionaire who has worked in pet stores as well as turned around a retailer. It doesn't seem feasible that Gamestop is his ultimate destiny. I'm sure he has more projects up his sleeve. Whatever they are, I want to be apart of it. I think he is our generation's Warren Buffet

>>61148233
Ser you’re not allowed to ask reasonable questions and speculate about the implications of certain information in gme. It is illegal and will be reported to the fbi. While youre at it please strike the phrase “MOASS” from your lexicon, it too has been deemed illegal by the thread police.

>>61148233
I don't hold any gme currently. I can admit that because I'm not some d word nigger that needs to insist he's something he's not. I've been in and out of gme over the years, mostly with LEAPs, and I love the stock. I think the bull/short squeeze thesis is true and stronger than ever, and because of that it is a play that you basically can't lose money on if you are patient enough. The premiums are too high, the break evens are too low, and the stock is obviously undervalued. GME has always been a deep value play, and it still is. I do however enjoy touring this thread and dunking on the obviously inorganic retards that police this place like hall monitors.

Someone said cusip was debunked. Any proof?

>>61148321
It's not related to GME so there's no reason to discuss it.

>>61148321
Yeah the baggie cope is all we need
>>61148324
Shills mad

Fidelity just told me that I cannot DRS GMEWS, despite their automated chat bot fully understanding my request and telling me they would be DRSed.

Also
>Keith
lol

>>61148324
>The CUSIPs of the warrants issued in parallel with GME, which are the same as the shell of the company he tried to acquire, which happens only during mergers and acquisitions, containing the NOLs which are of interest to shareholders whom he claims to represent as an activist CEO of GameStop and creditor of the shell in question, both of which are actively and openly seeking such a merger or acquisition
>has nothing to do with Gamestop
Listen bud, you're gonna get fired if you don't pull your act together. Better shills have come and gone for less egregious offenses. Seriously, do better.

guys i'm about to say something really controversial in this thread

i don't think ryan cohen is a retard who brutally rugpulled retail investors just to increase is net worth by 0.2 percent

there i said it... sorry if that's like off topic or something

>>61148379
This is the strangest talking point you BBBYQ spammers have made up. The two options are
>RC rugged retail (market manipulation)
or
>RC is going to acquire my bankrupt company to squeeze shorts and pay me (market manipulation)

This makes no sense, because if you trusted RC to follow him into a trade, you would have trusted him and exited too. You can't claim to trust RC and not trust RC at the same time. Your viewpoint is incoherent and proof you are trying to frame RC and GME holders as criminals.

>>61148379
This has essentially been confirmed when it was revealed that Ryan tried to buy the company for 400 million.

>>61148389
>This is the strangest talking point you BBBYQ spammers have made up.
Please don’t lump all bbby believers with Niggerfaggot. Nigger.

>>61148389
>if you don't mirror RC trades in a 1:1 manner you are literally trying to frame >us
>as criminals
holy mother of strawman

If anything not following Ryan is the very defense to the accusation of market manipulation they keep suggesting. How can they say anyone who bought both stock did it to cause a short squeeze? Also wouldn’t there need to be a short squeeze to accuse people of that? What a weird thing to admit.

>>61148398
>>61148401
Sorry you BBBYQ spammers lost your investment, and are now trying to harm my investment in GME because you're mad you made a bad bet.

>>61148410
>your entire thesis for buying BBBYQ is to make it get relisted and cause a short squeeze
>OMG WHAT DO U MEAN I WANT TO CAUSE A SQUEEZE
Why are you so mentally ill? Is it a genetic defect from inbreeding?

>>61148412
I'm sorry that you're not actually invested in gme. You should consider buying in. It would act as a nice hedge against your current job.

That's so weird how asking some questions about RC is causing such a fuss. I'm starting to think there are some nefarious actors here. Shouldn't we all be excited about an acquisition? What gives?

>>61148424
>spam off topic stocks in the GME thread
>claim anyone who criticizes you doesn't own GME
You're doing a really bad job of trying to criminally associate BBBYQ with GME. I hope you get fired and your bosses can hire better spammers.

>>61147774
/smg/ is that >>61146090 way faggot

>>61148437
Are you forced to use the words "criminally associate?" You sound so unnatural. I bet your script was written by a Sean Hannity fan. A brown vomiting boomer points. How fitting.

>>61148419
>only I’m allowed to use the genetic fallacy
Kek.

>>61148437
Talking about a potential connection between two companies on a message board designed in 2003 isn't anywhere close to illegal and anyone claiming so is a fucking retard

>>61148468
Holy shit I'm ded

>>61148476
>anyone claiming so is a fucking retard
It’s obviously retarded that it feels like a desperate justification to prevent that discussion. I wonder why.

>>61146622
I rebuke your attempts to speak into being a dip so that you can buy in low. You missed your chance. Gme shall stay above $20.

>>61148461
>>61148468
>>61148476
>>61148486
>>61148492
gamestop is profitable and there's nothing you can do to change that :)

>>61148497
Good, and?

>>61148497
You're doing great. Keep going.

It’s crazy how not picking a side and just applying a little logic leads to getting attacked by only one side. I’m sure I’m not the only one who has noticed. I’m gonna just say it guys, I think it’s pretty awkward in here already. That cusip matching sure made it hard to ignore.

Kenny is GIGALONG on Beyond Meat since the corporate reshuffle. Is it a cohencidence we have silly shillies pushing it? I think not.

>>61148509
Hmm I know of a shitty philosopher who invented your spamming strategy. True mental illness.

>>61148522
I’d say it’s a cohenidence that the thread police didn’t ask to see their beyond posting licenses.

>>61148524
>genetic fallacy
This is my new favorite meme. Also, if you truly believe that Karl Marx was a shit philosopher, then you either did not read his work or understand it.

>>61148529
His briefs probably told him 4chinz is a right wing cesspool so he has to inject his fake opinion about Marx to try and blend more.

>>61148511
It lines up a bit too well. I'm kind of tempted to email CUSIP and just see what is up. If the Kansas City shuffle is real I will shit my pants

>>61148529
hahahaha thanks for outing yourself

>>61148549
I am actually outing you, but you are too brown to see it happening in the moment.

>>61148549
>hahahaha thanks for outing yourself

>>61147916
The filter argument always confuses me. How is this a "dog whistle"? Bruh I'm on a phone and retarded.
Also I'm sick and tired of faggots. I live in a very red area and just had to witness "down the king" protestors. You're not welcome and post MoASS I will be doing things that are unsavory and perhaps illegal to make sure you stay out.

>>61148556
>smug reaction image
>copy paste what they said
Lol you guys can't even make creative responses. You're too stupid to deviate from the script you were fed.
>>61148565
>I'm on a phone
>says the VPN hopper
lol

If this is the quality of anti-GME shills, then your bosses are in too deep and there's nothing they can do.

happy for you guys. you lost a lot of money and time but formed a social circle with likeminded losers

>>61148571
I have 3 posts on this thread, the only ones I've made. I'm sorry you need to craft a narrative to satisfy your desperation, but it's simply not my problem.

>>61148571
You are literally picrel, and it has been the best entertainment on a Saturday afternoon. I actually timed out of my space marine lobby, because I've spent so much time laughing at you. I need to give my diaphragm a rest, but if you're still here later I would relish the opportunity to continue dunking on you. I am sure you will savor your "final word" time until I get back. Really ham it up. I am looking forward to reading it later.

I’m starting to think this guy is actually trolling. Kek Streisand effect enforcer

>>61148353
what legal avenus do investors have? can i legally force them to directly register my shares and warrants? can they just produce fake shares and fake warrants and refuse to directly register them? is that legal? don't they technically steal from GameStop by not providing a real warrant?

>>61147012
You could always as some wizards on /x/ to look into it via their plethora of methods.

Can we please stay on topic and discuss the BBBY warrants having BBBYQ's CUSIP.
I have had enough of this Tom Foolery.

>>61148321
I just got the confirm that it's been rebunked:
https://www.empirasign.com/all-issues/20230930-DK-BUTTERFLY-1/
>Also picrel

>>61147150
The simple solution was to post it in the BBBY thread. The simpler solution is to unalive all garBBBage munchers post-haste.

GameStop's fair value is at least 125.

>>61147150
At no point have they ever engaged with any of the incontrovertible evidence posted by the anon they had banned for discussing GME in the GME thread and even banned for discussing bankruptcy in the bankruptcy thread. Banned anon brought receipts and they haven’t even touched it. All they’ve done is slide and argue with straw men. This is an obvious containment op. Follow and read the archive links and you will see what they’re desperately trying to cover up.

How do you retards still not understand the Streisand effect in the year 2025?

My god this thread

>>61148720
They banned the banned anon for talking about it in the containment thread too. Follow the archived links. Banned anon brought receipts. It has nothing to do with “staying on topic”. They are simply trying to bury the information before it spreads.

>>61148735
Because when the tentacles of wallstreet and U.S. intelligence reach as far as they do, censorship is, unfortunately, extremely effective. Streisand effect is only in certain scenarios it isn’t some general universal truth. Think of how many superstonkers missed the bbby boat because of the crazy coverups going on over there, where platinumsparkles still fights bbby narratives on Twitter literally to this day and has interviewed Gary Gensler, most painfully obvious plant I’ve ever seen.

>>61146529 (OP)
hey i just bought 69k shares. what am i in for?

>>61148770
The destruction of Israel.

>>61148720
An even simpler solution is for you to stop being a d word nigger Doug.

>>61148754
Did they forget that everything on 4chan is archived and half the users are autistic shut ins? Did they really think Reddit tactics would work here?

>>61148740
>this thread
see pic rel
>>61148754
It is only in hindsight do we notice just how insidious and multi faceted their shilling really was. If you go to R/teddy and ready anything you see the comments are scathing in even the slightest utterance that BBBYQ might have anything to do with BYON or Marcus Lemonis.
Even to this day they lash out like vipers (much the shills do here) if you point out that Bed Bath and Beyond stores are open and even the BBBY ticker is being used.
Not only that, DK Butterfly is a very specific type of transaction that very appropriately applies here.
Despite kekking the shillies, they were actually quite effective in gas lighting us in to thinking we lost. When in hindsight it is plain as day that we won and we are probably weeks if not days away from the big reveal. It's not even like we won by the skin of our teeth. We fucking hit a grand-slam. Why do the shills seethe and howl and whine with such ruthless persistance? It's clear, and I have been saying it for years now. They want to keep us away from something. I think that something is literally BBBY (formerly Overstock).
Want to know why I think I am right? I received warrants on the exact same day as GME and those warrants from BYON has BBBYQs CUSIP.

Did you know that a lot of corporations might engage in projects that require years of planning. Even something like a Magic the Gathering set could take 3-5 years from start to finish to bring it on to the market. We should all appreciate how Marcus Lemonis apparently seems to make these wild, speculative corporate moves. Like he just woke up one day and said "Let's use all that BBBY IP" we bought after he was not originally using it. Same with the ticker. Same with the timing of the warrant dividend (that doesn't even have his company's CUSIP)

>>61148839
>>61148851
wrong thread. Try the >>>/biz/bbbyq or >>>/biz/smg

>>61148861
Is this a bit you’re doing? Are you like performative opposition for towel niggers to look reasonable and fair?

>>61148875
No I think they should discuss their bankrupt company in its dedicated thread, since it has no relation to GME.

>>61148880
And I think you should filter them instead of further derailing the threads by arguing with them. Your logic doesn’t make sense and as I’ve told you before I don’t believe your affliction is autism.

>>61148897
Sorry, I'm just not gonna let you shit up the GME thread and try to associate unrelated stocks with GME, to make GME holders look like criminals, haha. Eat shit.

>>61148897
>filter them instead of further derailing the threads
Shouldn't they logically be in the BBBY thread instead? The topic they're posting about is BBBY.

Hey guys, Caroline here. AMA.

>>61148901
>to make GME holders look like criminals
I’m sorry I’m just not buying it.

>hedgies want to accuse gme holders of market manipulation and are going to use a Fijian f1 forum to do it
The mental gymnastics to think anyone would believe this as a reason to censor conversation are off the charts. You’ll have to excuse my use of another smug face image.

>>61148962
Im imagining them kissing

>>61148968
Me too.

kek dumbfuck weekend baggies

>>61148901
But how is it not related when the CEO is involved with BBBY CH11 BK? That same company issued warrants using the supposedly "cancelled" stocks CUSIP?
I don't know, seems ontopic if you ask me. Am I missing something?

Hey does anyone else remember when they moved the goal post literally just yesterday and said Ryan might be buying overstock but voluntarily shared the supposedly unrelated point that bbbyq would absolutely not be re emerging and anyone who held into cancellation was not getting anything? No? Just me? That was weird? You’d think after saying something like that overstock would become more of a topic of conversation.

Life is so much better when you don't browse /GME/ on a weekend. Just thought I would stop by and say that.

MOASS is going to kick off when GME's CEO, Ryan Cohen, buys BBBYQ.

>>61149013
>When it's revealed that it all already happened.*

>>61148962
Is that greasy little jew going to ever do anything with the company he bought 5 years ago

>>61148746
They should bury themselves.
>>61148786
>muh Doug Seafood
Even your boogeymen are fucking garbage. He's not even a billionaire LMFAO

>61149013
i don't agree and i don't want to be associated with your and your personal opinions.

the amount of effort in /gme/ over the past five years to character assassinate Ryan Cohen just for them to turn around and use his name as an asset/tool so they can slide the board is funny as fuck.
>ryan is bad
>but hes related to towels
>there ryan is good
>but only for towels tho
Its also funny the sliding is not even talking about towels anymore, its about talking about not being able to talk about towels.

as always
>luv me gme

>>61149214
>Banned anon brought receipts proving everything
>Banned anon talks about how it is related to GME price discovery in the GME thread
>Banned
>Banned anon talks about the restructuring in the containment thread
>Banned
>None of the complainers address any of the evidence and only slide with the same talking points and straw men
Well 1PBTID you have two choices: either you’re dumb as shit and have no pattern recognition skills, or you’re being deliberately obtuse and disingenuous in an effort to prevent the information from spreading. Which is it?

>>61147916
>Definitely a new anti-GME team
It's just Caroline again.

>>61149214
It'd be non-actionable even if they were right so ayy lmao.
>GME at or below 32 I buy
>GMEWS cheap I buy
I'm up several thousand dollars doing this already this month.

>>61149265
It wouldn't be the first time a schizo got hot pocketed for spamming and then ban evasion and claimed the Lofty Powers were suppressing the content of his posts.

>>61149265
post the receipts from any archive service. They would still appear there even if they were deleted

>>61149300
It is actionable. That’s why they’re censoring it.
>It wouldn't be the first time a schizo got hot pocketed
Okay so refute the evidence. No one has. Every poster that has complained has refused to touch it and instead slides the thread by arguing against a straw man. The archives show the posts were 3 days apart. No ban evasion

>>61149309
Archive of banned anon >>61147150 and further archives in that post

>>61149350
>The archives show the posts were 3 days apart.
*more than 3 days apart

affect us?

>>61149350
>It is actionable.
How? What does it change for my investment strategy if I'm already buying and holding GME? This is why you niggers get accused of being off topic, it's LITERALLY IRRELEVANT at BEST.

>Okay so refute the evidence
OK you fucking retard. Look. YOU GOT THE CUSIPS WRONG. The towel stock and towel warrants have the SAME CUSIP. Your WHOLE SCHIZO THESIS is based on DYSLEXIA.
https://requiem.com/cusip-lookup/075896159/

>>61149392
Are you being retarded on purpose or does it come natural to you? The warrants were issued by the company that is still trading (actionable). What you just linked is not that company. The currently trading (actionable) company which issued the warrants uses 690370 not 075896, and yet the warrants use 075896 not 690370. That is the entire point. This is not possible according to CUSIP Global Services except in a merger. It is the smoking gun.

Banned anon talked about the order of operations for restructuring and how it is related to GME price discovery through relisting on the blockchain owned by the currently trading (actionable) company, which is obviously related to GME.

Are you deliberately attempting to mislead others or do you struggle with reading comprehension.?

>>61149475
Further, banned anon was banned for discussing these details in the containment thread as well according to the archives. This is very obviously not about “staying on topic” when the information is banned in both threads. It is clearly about hiding the information and preventing it from spreading precisely because it is actionable.

>>61149496
3 for free for shoahed? Neat!

>>61149265
>>61149350
>>61149496
You forgot
>copy pasting off topic spam and blatantly lying about GME
>>61149281
shut up shill. She was here once and the rest is you making up people in your head to attack.

>>61149534
Got a source for that or is this just more sliding to avoid discussing the evidence elephant in the room?

GME is fully contained through FTDs and the ETF creation/redemption process. GMEWS is fully contained through FTDs and the ETF creation/redemption process. Something needs to happen to allow for price discovery. Why wouldn’t that be relisting on the blockchain? There’s only one option for relisting on the blockchain and it happens to be owned by the source of the evidence elephant. This is very clearly related to GME.

By all means, dispute the evidence. Prove banned anon wrong. As a fellow GME investor surely you only care about the facts, yes? You have the archive links. There’s nothing stopping you, assuming that you actually own GME and are interested in seeing GME price discovery.

>>61149574
>This is very clearly related to GME.
Well no, the preposition you're basing this off of is a hypothetical.

>>61149594
Yeah bro that's what investing is

>>61149605
No that's not a reason, you're saying it's clearly related to GME. But you admit it's a hypothetical. This isn't investing general, it's the GME general.

>>61149594
Where do GME hypotheticals belong if not the GME thread?

The fact that banned anon has been banned in both threads—more than 3 days apart so it is not ban evasion—for sharing the same information is activating my almonds. There is not a single GME holder who would not be interested in the reasons for such an obvious coordinated effort to prevent information from circulating. It very clearly has nothing to do with “staying on topic”. Even now, none of the complainers are willing to address the substance of banned anon’s posts. It could not be more obvious that there is smoke here and where there is smoke there is fire (emoji?).

The more pushback received, the more likely it is to be correct. Streisand effect.

>>61149620
I didn't say shiy I just got here.
I'm not getting into a pointless argument about the semantics of investing. It's GME general so we're hypothesized whats going to happen next. Sorry if this upsets you.

>>61149628
>Where do GME hypotheticals belong if not the GME thread
It's a hypothetical about another company's relation to GME so SMG or a general based on that company.

>>61149632
No the question was how it was related, saying something is hypothetically related is admitting they are not.

>>61149637
Not really
Maybe someone can start a thread police thread where you can tell everyone in there what not to do based on your feelings

>>61149644
No entirely, it's a hypothetical situation where another company benefits from a relationship with GME, exactly the same way AMC represented itself back in 2021 as having talks with RC. And it's indisputable that AMC doesn't belong in the GME general.

>>61149620
Yeah it's so annoying that they spam garbage here, then when questioned make up arguments or spam random bullshit. These are the ultimate pilpul debaters. The GME warrants really got them riled up.

I know these are bad actors, because actual BBBYQ enthusiasts would make well reasoned arguments, not copy paste paragraph spam and bad faith lying.

>you’re only allowed to invest and talk about stocks you know the future of
Fucking Kek. The more the they bend their logic to insist upon their control the more absurd it gets.

>>61149659
No, the question was how is tzero clearly related to GME. The answer was it isn't, therefore where does the conversation belong?

How are you bbbyag fags coping?

>>61149667
I think you may need to actually read that first post you responded to.

>>61149690
Now can we talk about why the cusip for the warrants matches the original shells?

>>61149691
>There’s only one option for relisting on the blockchain and it happens to be owned by the source of the evidence elephant. This is very clearly related to GME.
It's clearly a hypothetical about tzero.

>>61149656
How very interesting that you did not respond to >>61149574 and instead chose to repeat an accusation without any evidence. I wonder why that is.

It’s so very strange that absolutely none of the accusers are willing to address the substance of banned anon’s posts or in any way make an effort to dispute them. Damned peculiar. It almost seems like their only priority is to prevent the spread of information.

>>61149659
It’s all so arbitrary and it all seems to revolve around making sure that the things banned anon was talking about aren’t discussed anywhere. I wonder what the motivation for that could possibly be.

>>61149667
Oh you know the future now? Why did banned anon get banned in both threads for discussing the same information? What alternative to blockchain listing exists for GME? What alternative to blockchain listing exists for price discovery? The warrants are clearly a non-issue as they have put them in ETFs to abuse the creation/redemption process for phantom liquidity while brokers refuse to DRS. GME revenue is up 100% YoY and yet we’re still pinned at $23 with a market cap at asset value and barely above the seemingly hard floor of cash per share x2.

>>61149690
And just like that 1PBTID comes in with a non sequitur to fight against another straw man. Why won’t you address the contents of banned anon’s posts, I wonder? It’s so strange that absolutely none of the complainers are willing to do this. Not one.

>>61149709
Is there another blockchain exchange for GME to relist on? Or have you decided that speculating about GME relisting on the blockchain is off topic in the GME thread? You seem to be twisting yourself into a pretzel.

>>61149719
>paragraph spam
didn't read.

Pack it up voys, we can't hypothesize anymore. Thread police said so.
MOASS? Off the table. Hypothetical.
Merger or acquisition of any company? In the quarterly reports, but what that may be remains a hypothetical. Can't talk about it.
Who is behind the screen telling you what to think? Purely hypothetical. They're probably not brown sir.
No thinking in this thread at all.

>>61149719
>Oh you know the future now?
No that's clealry not what I am saying or demanding.

>>61149721
>Is there another blockchain exchange for GME to relist on?
It's own. It's also still a hypothetical about a different company's relationship to GME. So the same level of merit as AMC being involved with GME. Zero.

>>61149734
Literally a strawman argument. You can't give a good reason why the argument for tzero has merit.

>>61149721
Yeah I just got home to post that image. You think I'm gonna read the whole thread? Fuck bbbyfaggots

>>61149754
>Fuck bbbyfaggots
They have their own thread. Yet they don't use it.

>>61149748
Why don’t you read and address banned anon’s argument? Surely as a genuine GME investor interested in this topic you have no issues with doing so because your primary motivation isn’t to prevent such information from proliferating through organic online discussion, right?

Here you go. Follow the archives. Happy trails. >>61147150

>>61149748
By all means, please refute banned anon’s argument.

>>61149759
Why was banned anon banned in that thread too for discussing the same information? Sure seems like a coordinated effort to keep that information from spreading. In a completely unrelated coincidence, not one complainer ITT has dared to refute banned anon’s posts. Why is that I wonder? I guess we’ll never know. ;)

I don't care about bbby, kek (this makes them mad)

>>61149754
Invitation to refute banned anon’s arguments was extended to you but I accidentally gave the other ID a double (you).

>>61149773
>Why don’t you read and address banned anon’s argument?
Because it's a strawman argument against I point that wasn't argued. Why on earth would I argue against that?
>By all means, please refute banned anon’s argument
You've already asked this in your same post.

>>61149783
Thank you for admitting that you are not a GME investor and do not care about GME price discovery through relisting on the blockchain.

>>61149785
Thank you for once again proving that you are being paid to prevent that information from spreading. Unfortunately you are so bad at your jobs that the information will spread faster now due to the Streisand effect of banning banned anon in both threads for on topic discussion in both threads. It has been made abundantly clear that it is not about “staying on topic” but instead about making sure no one sees this information and that it does not organically proliferate through online discussion spaces. Good luck getting the toothpaste back in the tube.

>>61149783
Your care enough to screenshot, give that screenshot a coy filename and post a tweet exchange related to it.

>>61149759
Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me
Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me
Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me
Motherfucker
Uh

>>61149783
so true! Look at their responses
>>61149800
>paragraph spam
>>61149801
>dox yourself
nope, faggot

>>61149800
Thank you for admitting that you are a faggot

>>61149800
>Thank you for once again proving that you are being paid to prevent that information from spreading
That's another strawman argument. You're both trying to make this argument about subjects I haven't raised.

>dox yourself
>nope, faggot

Someone tell the superstonk moderators (jew fags) that power pack pull posts are being used to launder legit posts.

not to be a bastard, but that thread you pointed to, 3/4ths of the items are just a random person disengaging from the subject matter, in each one, actually no real information was conveyed. If this is evidence, then me saying:
>israel didnt cause 9/11
>israel didnt cause 9/11
>israel didnt cause 9/11
has equal validity of truth.

the one where they posted the PDF's also conveniently ignores the fact that the entire thread got purged because of spamming the same variant of "provide a example of cusip spam that happened that thread which is clearly against the rules.
>israel probably did have something to do with 9/11 btw

>>61149889
im referring to this btw:
>>61149350

>>61149889
So he was banned for intense faggotry?

>>61149889
>pic
Gets me every time. Now that I think about it, the pikachu avatar fag who has been BBBYQ spamming for years, that seems like a pretty well reasoned persona. Made by a boomer.
>what do millenials like?
>IDK, uhhh pokemon! the yellow one! use that as the psyop image!

>>61149899
You're still glowing. Nice digits fren.

>>61149475
>The warrants were issued by the company that is still trading (actionable). What you just linked is not that company.
It was a direct CUSIP lookup of what you claimed was the Overstock warrants but were not. Oopsie!

Caroline again. Kek baggies!

>>61150048
Those dang Caroline thread police newfag redditor tourist silos!

>>61146666
Based

Looks like I walked into the BBBY thread by mistake

>>61149899
I like it because it has homosexual angle with a hint of imminent rape (just like gme)

>>61148996
/Thread

The identifier is the company that actually issued this security.

So what this paperwork is showing is that DK Butterfly is the one actually issuing the BBBYW warrant.

Now, obviously that’s exciting news. But I think that expectations should absolutely be tempered. As someone in software, I absolutely think this is some back office mishap where the ticker BBBY used to be tied to that particular issuer (DK Butterfly) and therefore this new warrant was created using the old Issuer even though we know the CUSIP should stay with the originally business and not travel with the ticker.

But I think it’s more likely that someone screwed up.

However, if that’s wrong and no one screwed up, then it definitely means DK butterfly issued the BBBYW warrant.

No clue what that means, but it’s enough reason to hope but I suggest remaining skeptical.

Ryan Cohen here. Just letting you all know that in just 6 more years of holding you should be able to break even. WAGMI

>>61145948
>>61145948
>>61145948
Threaded.

wow, this thread is 90% hedgie funded discord spam. it's clear the /gme/ janitor is compromised.

>>61150834
Funny, I had a similar epiphany about 30 mins ago, pondering why something that isn't actionable gets pushed so much 24/7 in the same style.

Congrats at successfully making this thread unreadable and any proper discussion impossible

>>61149889
>Refuses to discuss evidence
>Mischaracterizes evidence
As I expected. Your team is terrified and trying desperately to contain this information. It’s not going away retards. The more you struggle the worse it gets for you.

>>61149970
Lying as usual. By all means show us the CUSIP for the warrants issued by the trading (actionable) company. Go ahead. Prove your point.

>>61150848
The company that issued warrants using the CUSIP-6 of another company is still trading, is currently in the slurp zone, and that makes it extremely actionable. Which is why your team is freaking out trying to contain this.

>>61150937
This is the only thing they can do because banned anon proved that there is an actionable pre-merger trade in the slurp zone and they need to contain this information by any means necessary. GME will not have price discovery until it trades on the blockchain and banned anon laid out a road map for what is happening. The shitfest that they turned the thread into coupled with their refusal to address the evidence and outright lies about it gives away the whole game. Read the warosu archives for yourself and verify the information yourself. They’re scrambling to hide this.

Imagine buying GME in 2019. That’s what they’re trying to prevent. If you let them trick you then you’ll still make it with GME eventually. But the thesis that banned anon laid out suggests that GME is the final step in the order of operations. You don’t ban a poster in both threads for “off topic posting” when the posts are demonstrably on topic unless you are trying to keep the word from getting out. Boomers do not understand the Streisand effect.

>61151012
>banned anon proved
how do you know an anon is banned if you are not on the same discord server as said "anon"?

>>61151051
We both know that your team are the ones coordinating through discord. But for the sake of the lurkers and legitimate anons reading this, go look at the archives that banned anon posted. The posts were deleted and banned anon said multiple times that they were banned for posting the information.

If you think they weren’t banned and you aren’t trying to hide the information, then why don’t you post the information they posted verbatim? Simple enough, right?

Was Larry Chang really on the PP show?

the cusip-6 was the final blow to any credible narrative that BBBYQ is dead and gone forever, and considering the CEO of GameStop tried to buy BBBY, it would appear he was successful.

Also isn't it strange that anti GME narratives have dried up in the last 6 months here, and are now entirely focused on BBBYQ and BBBY suppression?

"Slurp zone"

Bbby, like the old bbby, is burning money and will soon resort to dilution to pay creditors. You want people that got wiped out once on this ticker to get wiped out again? You are demented.

>>61151116
Thank you 1PBTID for your great concern for my financial well-being. Unfortunately for your team I took the liberty of looking at their financials. They only have $18.5 million in debt, down from $34.2 million in 2024. They currently have $120.6 million in cash. This is as of the June 30th 10-Q. The next one is on October 27th. Their chairman receives no pay (he does it jannie style) and bought his shares with his own money at $27 per share. His finances are aligned with the success of the company. That sounds an awful lot like the philosophy of GME Chair-Man and RCEO, Ryan Cohen.
Your team is desperate to keep this under wraps. Banned anon was right about everything. GME will not see price discovery until it relists on the blockchain, which won’t happen until the blockchain company is spun off, which won’t happen until the confirmed merger is complete, and right now I can buy first class tickets to tendie town for less than $8.

Thank you retards for being so bad at your jobs that you couldn’t help but Streisand effect a goldmine. I would have never paid any attention to this if you hadn’t tried so hard to shut it down.

>>61151113
Problem is, when this was discovered 2 weeks ago everyone screamed merger filings must be imminent. But nothing happened. No one should give a fuck and focus on GME instead. Either BABY stays in chapter 11 or there is recovery, but until official news is published there is no clue in discussion. There is nothing to invest in.

Just going to buy gamestop, shill your double bankrupt company in smg faggot

>>61151012
>they need to contain this information by any means necessary
this gives me vibes of when RRP was locked in on a rough gauge of them making approx how many diamonds between their collective cheeks at any given time.

>>61151200
>Don’t invest in the acquirer while it’s trading for less than $8 per share
>There’s nothing to invest in (there is)
>It’s not actionable (it is)
>Okay sure you have proof of a merger but it was immediately made public therefore it’s not going to happen
>Do not take advantage of this publicly available information
>Take no action at all. Just focus on GME.
>I’m so sleepy. Aren’t you sleepy? Gosh, so sleepy.
Thank you 1PBTID for your deep concern for my financial well-being however I am an individual investor and capable of making my own financial decisions. I can’t speak for the anon you replied to but I would imagine they are also an individual investor capable of making their own decisions.

Why are you so concerned about what other people choose to invest in and talk about? I am interested in talking about banned anon’s thesis for GME price discovery through relisting on the blockchain which necessitates talking about banned anon’s thesis for the order of operations which includes conversation about this actionable opportunity that you are trying so hard to cover up.

>>61151232
Okay 1PBTID that was always allowed. Have fun buying GME. Post your next buy with a handwritten time-stamped note (you won’t).

>>61151255
Mad at my first post this weekend because I said I'm going to buy gme over your slide faggot bullshit? Kill yourself

>>61151253
Do you have the one about vampires?

>>61151273
No I’m not mad. Buy as much GME as you want. Do what you want with your money. Why would I care about that? I even asked you to flex your GME buys with a unique image. It would be very based. You are based, aren’t you anon?

You the other hand seem to be very angry at what other people choose to buy with their money. I wonder why.

>>61151200
>everyone screamed merger filings must be imminent
Only hype fatigue shills and overhyped people did that.

>Either BABY stays in chapter 11 or there is recovery, but until official news is published there is no clue in discussion

>no clue in discussion

So we shouldn't speculate (literally the entire point of investing is evidence based speculation on future price changes and market conditions)?

>There is nothing to invest in.
the Ticker BBBY is currently trading, and owned by OverStock, the same company that owns tzero, and also is the most famous company to have battled naked short sellers.

>>61151289
You bitch at me for being a 1pbtid, in here trying to persuade people to buy a shit stock when warrants are cheaper, and try to imply I'm not here for gamestop. Now since you're locked in here with me, I'm "mad" fuck off. You want buys? Post yours.

>>61151232
>Just going to buy gamestop
^^THIS^^ retarded son-of-a-bitch IS FUCKING KIKES with this one neat trick...
and basically >>61151154 are FUCKING STUPID!!!
How???...Just watch the free video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KquFZYi6L0

Whoever predicted you guys would start advocating for people to buy bbby was 100% right.

Company is burning almost 10m a month and will begin the death spiral finance process yet here you are spamming it day after day.

Disgusting behavior. Either you are paid to do this or you are deranged.

>>61151291
>So we shouldn't speculate
No one is telling you that. In fact, you are being told (by me) to do exactly that (in your own thread). It shouldn't matter where you speculate (unless you REALLY need to do that in the /gme/ thread for some raisin)

>>61151370
Porque no las dos?

I base my opinion on bbby the same way I do gme. By the amount of "concerned" anons who historically shit and piss themselves over it.

>>61151325
I notice patterns. 1PBTID attempting to manufacture consensus is an obvious pattern. See: >>61151344

>>61151370
I’m not telling anyone to buy anything. Do what you want with your money. I’m simply noticing patterns and making decisions based on my pattern recognition.
>Company is burning almost 10m a month and will begin the death spiral finance process
$6.3 million per month as of the June 30th 10-Q and the trend is rapidly narrowing losses. It was more than 3x that two years ago. Even if it remains the same that still gives them 2 years of runway. Is this the part where you tell us that you only began to buy GME after it became profitable?

>>61151374
Banned anon was banned for discussing it in your containment thread that every post you’ve made ITT is advertising. This is very obviously not about “staying on topic” when you ban discussion of it everywhere. You retards really fucked up this time. The cat is out of the bag. Streisand effect.

>>61151403
Why base your opinion on pattern recognition like an autist when you can base your opinion on manufactured consensus like a woman? Don’t you understand? They’re just looking out for you!

At no point in this entire shit show of a thread have any of the complainers ever once addressed any of the evidence posted by banned anon. It could not be more obvious that they are coordinating to run a containment op and prevent this information from proliferating organically in online discussion spaces. Read the archives for yourselves, anons. These boomers actually thought that they could just delete posts here by getting their people on jannie duty and it would all just disappear.

gme got so hot it broke off smg and became it's own general, the reason bullshit gets brought up in here is the hope that die hards will latch on to something else for that sweet liquidity - but ye shan't be getting any of mine, try not to be upset slide baggies :^)

>>61151370
Kek'd if they do a double bankruptcy.

Also I thought you guy would like to know I got assigned on two more puts on Friday at expiry. I just won't stop buying GME. It's my favorite stock. I just like it!

>>61151453
Proofs he was jannied?

I actually didn’t see people start saying to buy bbby until after someone said they they shouldn’t. It always seemed like the whole argument surrounding bbby was whether it should be illegal to talk about in here. Kek. Which makes it ever more strange that the thread police would just voluntarily and randomly say no one should bbby when I don’t think anyone even said you should. It’s bizarre.

>>61151476
>I actually didn’t see people start saying to buy bbby
>he wasn't here when he didn't buy at $5

>>61151494
I don’t remember Keith doing that either he would just point to it as interesting. Similar to now.

>>61151513
>I don’t remember Keith doing that either he would just point to it as interesting.
Of course you don't, Mr. 1pbtid

At this point the amount of shit flinging surround bbby makes it seem like a gamble I’m willling to take as there is little to no risk.(no I don’t believe the fbi will kick my door down kek). The worst that could happen is I lose a few bucks but the upside seems too good to miss out on. What if the towel schizos are right?

>>61151457
>I’m not gonna buy
Okay do what you want
>I’m serious, I’m not interested
Okay that’s fine
>You’re not gonna get me to buy
Nobody is trying to get you to buy anything
>I’m just gonna buy GME
Okay then that was always allowed
>I said I’m not gonna buy so stop talking about it!
Nobody gives a shit what you do with your money. Yet you seem to care very much what other people do with theirs and even more about what they choose to discuss.

>>61151466
Based if true

>>61151471
Banned anon said they were catching 3 for frees multiple times. Their posts are at least 3 days apart and they were deleted, even in your containment thread. The archives show this. They haven’t made any more posts since their post was deleted ITT. They are obviously getting hot pocketed.

>>61151513
>1PBTID invokes the arch nemesis persona.
Holy shit you retards are so bad at your jobs. All you had to do was shut the fuck up and now you’ve made it so much worse by trying to cover it up. It’s the “forget GameStop” strategy all over again.

>>61151534
That 1pbtid is literally agreeing with you.

>>61151534
>Banned anon said they were catching 3 for frees multiple times.
Proofs of getting jannied?

>>61151457

This is basically it.

It is incredibly obvious there is a campaign across all socials to turn retail into bagholders. Distressed companies, coins, etc. Once a group is identified as a good source of liquidity they are repeatedly targeted.

I would say it should be investigated but CNBC does it every day. Seems to be a feature not a bug.

Do your DD, don't buy distressed stocks, pump and dumps, and scams. Don't be a mark.

The first BBBY should be a cautionary tale to all. I will never forget Sue Gove promising a great news release the following morning, stock rallied right into a pre market dilution. Absolutely cold blooded. That is who is leading you on in these threads.

"Slurp zone"
More like derp zone.

Bbby is trading over 100% above its 52w low. Will probably be sub $2 in a year.

The fact is that most babyraper holders are either GME negative or fucking pedophiles. These threads are policed by a small outspoken group of gatekeepers who seek to manufacture consensus around the idea that GME discussion and community should be segregated from GameStop, despite every indication otherwise. That's why they hate the word disingJewish. It reveals their entire plot. I believe that some of these stockbashers may be bona fide babyrape holders who rally against gme discussion like a monkey taught to teach other monkeys not to grab bananas, even though he himself does not understand why.

>>61151453
>1PBTID attempting to manufacture consensus is an obvious pattern.
If I state I'm buying silver, in the /pmg/ thread, it's encouraged.
If I state I'm buying XMR, in the /xmr/ thread, then I'm enboldened.
However, If I state I'm buying fucking Z-Cash...in the /xmr/ thread, I'm getting laughed at and called a faggot.
(You) are currently in a /gme/ thread shilling BBBY, therefor, you are a faggot.

>>61151542
>It is incredibly obvious there is a campaign across all socials to turn retail into bagholders.
I thought the campaign was to try and accuse us of being market manipulators for buying and discussing more than one stock? Is this you pivoting?
I’ve run out of smug images to use. Sorry

>>61151476
There are memes about buying at $5 because some faggot sold all his gme for that piece of shit. The fact someone's shilling that shit at $8 is fucking funny, especially since it's under the premise that company has historic beef with shortsellers and they have some fintech investments.

Gme already has a ceo that's dealing with short bullshit, gme already had crypto / nft efforts that got stopped short and are JUST catching a second wind with the Power Packs.

I couldn't give a fuck what another retard does with their money, but then you have bitches like >>61151255 trying to chastise people in a gme general for thinking buying his bullshit at 8 dollars is ridiculous and trying to bitch people out over their first posts.

Fuck that faggot, fuck that company, if they 100x bro God fucking bless them

>>61151534
You seem to care very much so that you write to me unprompted twice. Recognize that pattern faggot

I wish something would happen so I can stop looking at manufactured drama

>>61151542
>Do your DD, don't buy distressed stocks
I wouldn’t have bought gme in 2019 if I listened to you. Do you see how much more slippery your slope gets as you’re forced to twist your logic? While we’re here what do you think Burry saw in gme in 2008 when he wrote that letter to the board?

>>61151630
*2018

>>61151532
They are still refusing to address banned anon’s evidence and thesis as it relates to GME. The best they’ve been able to manage is telling easily debunked lies about the warrant CUSIP. The only reason for this behavior is to prevent actionable information from spreading.

>>61151541
That is proof. What you want a screenshot? You’ll have to ask banned anon after his 3 for free is up.

>>61151542
>don't buy distressed stocks
Is this the part where you tell us you didn’t buy GME until it became profitable last year?
>trading over 100% above its 52w low
Oh so I guess you just started buying GME 5 months ago.

>>61151555
>Banned anon was banned for discussing GME price discovery by relisting on the blockchain in the GME thread
>Banned anon was banned for discussing corporate restructuring in the containment thread
>Total shit show of obvious coordinated stock bashers trying desperately to prevent the information from spreading
>No one rebuking banned anon’s thesis
Yes obviously your concern is about “staying on topic”

>>61151652
>the proof is because he told us so
Oh? How did he tell you so? Wasn't he able to screenshot his vacation ticket and send that over while he communicated his getting his three4free?

>>61151580
I don’t care what you spend your money on and I don’t care if you think it’s a bad investment. That’s your decision. I simply said that I am going to buy because of the obvious campaign to shut it down everywhere it is discussed including in the containment thread. If you lack pattern recognition skills that’s your problem.

>>61151601
I bet that made sense in your head.

>>61151610
They will never leave these threads alone and after GME rips they will pivot to trying to get you to sell. Read banned anon’s thesis. The price of GME is clearly contained due to abuse of the ETF creation/redemption cycles to synthesize liquidity in addition to strategic FTDs. They even put the warrants in ETFs to continue kicking the can. GME is stuck until corporate action is taken to allow for price discovery. Banned anon suggests that this action will be relisting on the blockchain and they laid out a roadmap for that. If that roadmap is correct, it includes an actionable trade that individual investors can decide for themselves whether or not they want to investigate and pursue. The proof is in the CUSIP pudding and in the all hands on deck shit show in this thread to prevent discussion of banned anon’s thesis. None of the complainers are willing to discuss or report the information in order to debunk it. They slide, cry, use logical fallacies, attempt to manufacture consensus, and slide some more. That makes it very obvious that they are running a containment op to keep the information from being seen. Look at the warosu archives for this thread and follow banned anon’s posts. Decide for yourself.

>>61151630

Yeah and it went down even lower in 2020. Without RC buying and WSB absolutely giga launching it, they probably would have had to death spiral financed just like everybody else has done.

It's not a slipery slope. GME got lucky. BBBY didn't. AMC isn't. Countless others are going to zero. Or already have. The list is long.

Zero or hero is dumb. Invest prudently and secure lasting wealth. Stop gambling.

Meanwhile GME,
Trading at 52w low.
Growing EPS and Revenue.
Growing book value.

If there is something to slurp it is the topic of this thread. Not some loser burning 2% of its market cap a month.

>>61151671
I guess we’ll find out in a few days won’t we? In the meantime why don’t you address anything that banned anon posted? Very strange that you want to talk about anything except the evidence and the thesis. Almost like you’re trying to cover it up.

>>61151687
Unfortunately for your efforts to shut it down, your team was stupid enough to ban a user discussing GME price discovery through relisting on the blockchain. You retards opened up Streisand’s box and now it’s never going back.

>>61151702
Nah. No engagement until the jannyticket is presented.
>inb4 his ban was actually 2weeks

>>61151702

You are retarded and most likely poor.

>>61151687
But by your logic no one should have bought gme? Nobody knew gme was going to get “lucky”.

>>61151674
>you're a 1pbtid
>you're very angry
>you're financially concerned
>you think it's a bad investment
I said it was funny and you twist my words for the fourth time, fuck you and your Sunday

>>61151610
>wall of text spam
>wall of text spam
>wall of text spam
>real gme anon banter
>wall of text spam
>wall of text spam
>wall of text spam
same. i want my comfy gme thread back.

>cleaning photos
>come across this gem
>'certain cancellation'
Lel

these faggots are DESPERATE for their gay cancelled stock to come back, kek

i'm going to post the most controversial thing one can post in a /gme/ thread, brace yourselves:
i really just want to talk about GameStop or banter with my /gme/ frens.
simple as.

This one is next

>>61151713
>No I’m not going to discuss the information I’m trying to bury because arbitrary reason
Convenient. Thank you for proving me right. ;)

>>61151717
Ok boomer

>>61151722
You said it was funny after being called out for getting mad. >>61151289


At no point have any of these crybaby faggots ever addressed the evidence or the thesis posted by banned anon. Not once. The closest they came was telling an easily refuted lie about the CUSIP. This total refusal to shine a light on information they insist is harmless and wrong is all the proof needed that they’re running a coordinated containment op to shut it down. Probably from discord as that’s what they accuse anyone who steps outside their neat little Overton window of doing.

>>61151777
>arbitrary reason
>proof that he was banned (your main reason to trust him btw) is arbitrary
Youre are brainlet.

>>61151718
Strange isn’t it? They love GME so much and want to talk about GME yet they push talking points that make it clear they wouldn’t have considered investing in GME until just a few months ago. Look at those goal posts move!

>>61151783
What are you going to do when banned anon comes back and posts proof? Cry? Shit your pants? Move the goalpost again? I will screenshot your reply to enjoy next week.

>>61151786
Nobody is allowed to invest in gme with the awareness that there is a short squeez looming over it even if they literally don’t have the power to cause that short squeeze merely be a flea on the back of the person who does. The absurdity is unreal.

>>61151796
>Move the goalpost again?
Yes, I will just repeat
>You'll never get your money back from BBBY(Q)
I literally cannot lose.

>>61151809
Why is you winning conditional on this
>You'll never get your money back from BBBY(Q)
What does bbby have to do with gme moass?

>>61151718
>1pbtid affirming his bullshit
>>61151232
>1pbtid supporting gme and denouncing slide bags
of fuck im gonna recognooz

>>61151801
stocks get "squeezed" all the time. it's really just an emotionally manipulative buzzword meaning that shorts lost the bet and have to pay back what they owe. the opposite of longs getting liquidated happens all the time too but nobody ever makes a fuzz about that. the underlying reason is that being a short seller is a rich persons game while the common retail fool without insider information like rich and connected people have must simple bet on something to "go up" at some point. retail is flying blind while the shorts see all the cards.
me being a GameStop longterm investor have only one legal point of guidance i am allowed to follow and that is fundamentals. GameStop's fundamentals have turned from shit to fantastic and that's why i continue to buy and hold. i am allowed to buy and hold GameStop and no false narrative of illegal short squeezes or accusations of market manipulation can hurt me if i just buy and hold the company i like and I believe is worth more than it is now according to fundamentals.

>>61151829
But is he wrong? The logic is sound. You can’t engage in debate and not expect to get your own flawed logic to be used against you.

>>61151824
>Why is you winning conditional on this
I win on multiple fronts. Dunking on bbbaggies over and over again is just an exercise in winning.
>What does bbby have to do with gme moass?
It doesn't.

>>61151839
>>61151839
I mildly agree with the 1pbtid. What I don't agree with entirely is saying that gme got lucky. I think rc put as much work as a ceo could to contribute to decisions that reflected in the quarterly reports improvements. I bought gme post 1st sneeze and have an $18 average.

I'm not even arguing against the companies being slid in here. I just don't think they're Gamestop and have warrants that aren't even a month old being discussed less than these other subjects.

>>61151801
They are so transparent but they can never stop and they can never leave.

>>61151809
I accept your concession :)

They can never discuss the information they are trying to hide. It’s a simple as that. Their refusal is 100% proof that banned anon was right.

>>61151890
Waiting on the proof of ban (you'll never show it)

Guys I think I’m just gonna believe the guy that actually seems driven by autism.

>>61151998
I respect your decision. I wonder if gme will issue more warrants next year after these last few weeks of brokers being silly.

I see a lot of articles about the ai bubble lately. Think they're finally priming the general public for the crash?

>>61152120
Seems like it.

>>61151809
>I literally cannot lose.
I'm going to seriously assume you're here in good faith, so I'm going to ask you two questions, and I only want to hear either a YES or a NO to each.

First question: Did you own BBBYQ before the company went bankrupt?
Second question: When the ticker came back in 2025 as BBBY, but owned by a different company, did you receive your original investment back?

>>61148389
>if you trusted RC to follow him into a trade, you would have trusted him and exited too
the moment he exited the stock brutally fucking tanked
you're also forgetting his cheeky little tweet that pushed BBBY to $30 before he rugged
>teehee why didn't you just sell with ryan
fucking lol

>>61147939
im thinking of putting $100 just in case

>>61152282
Sounds like a psyop

>>61147939
>We could make it happen you know
Make what happen? Why are you posting about a onions-meat company in a /gme/ thread?
>>61152282
>im thinking of putting $100 just in case
Keep on moving, nigger. /smg/ is THAT way >>61150039
This is a /gme/ neighborhood.
>>61148389
>RC rugged retail (market manipulation)
>RC is going to acquire my bankrupt company to squeeze shorts and pay me (market manipulation)
This is correct. No matter which angle they take, the BBBY spammers always make Ryan look like he's just going around trying to deliberately cause short squeezes in the first place. He bought calls, wrote a letter, and made an offer to help Bath succeed. What did the Bath board do? They rejected his offer and deliberately tanked the company. Now the shills can use this as "evidence" that Ryan is a market manipulator. BBBYQ investors are never getting their money back. I'm not surprised in the slightest that Ryan is taking his sweet ol' time with finding a potential company to acquire, as you never know if the target company's board is compromised by BCG and could sink the whole deal before it's finalized.
>Your viewpoint is incoherent and proof you are trying to frame RC and GME holders as criminals.
^^This^^
They HATE that we can see through their bullshit. They spam a bankrupted company that only came back because another company bought the company name fucking lmfao.

>>61152207
Also, take note how >>61151809 can't even answer simple YES or NO questions about if he got his original BBBYQ investment back when the BBBY ticker returned fucking kek.

>RC is going to acquire my bankrupt company to squeeze shorts and pay me (market manipulation)
The only people I’ve seen say this are the people that tell me I can’t say moass here. Kek

>>61152358
I've seen the opposite.
My opinion is they've chosen to confuse the issue as much ass possible because they simply cannot not chimp out whenever its mentioned

>>61151552
I am honored that the shills were so beset by my post yesterday that it has become pasta overnight. Thank you for the compliment. Tell your boss if he wants someone who knows how to meme, you know where to find me (and if he can't find me, he can't afford me.)

>>61152358
>The only people I’ve seen say this are the people that tell me I can’t say moass here. Kek
Who's saying you can't say MOASS? You can say whatever you like in our thread, as long as it's on topic with GME. I personally believe in the MOASS because kikes are brazen and really think they can shake us out of our shares, and all the
>cohencidences
>muh packet loss
>muh glitches
>muh fat finger extra zeros on reputable ledgers
All point so something fucky-wucky with GME. All that aside, Gamestop is actually a profitable company against all odds, and Ryan has done a stellar job of trimming the fat and raising capital. The possibilities of what Gamestop can do with their warchest alone makes the price of the stock worth much more than what it's being pinned to right now. But I'm content with arrogant kikes allowing me to accumulate more shares at discounted prices :^)

Ryan been quiet recently

>>61152440
He's probably busy with the CH11 bankruptcy for BBBYQ. Did you know Overstock just released warrants on the same day as GME. But here's the thing, the CUSIP on the BBBY warrants were for BBBYQ.
Weird huh?

>>61152457
My brother lost a lot of money listening to grifters like you PP the hospital orderly and the London paki uber driver , the day of the rake is coming.

>>61152057
As long as brokers refuse to DRS warrants they will not be a problem. The DTCC will hold the real warrants so GameStop can’t see them being exercised. Whenever someone exercises a broker warrant the DTCC will just take their $32 and give them another IOU. 60%+ off exchange volume for warrants and they’re showing up in ETFs now for fake liquidity. If RC issues another round of warrants it will be on the blockchain and oops we just went off topic according to the team managing discussion on these threads.

>>61152282
Put a bottle up your ass

>>61152328
Banned anon says that RC was the diversion and Icahn was the killer. Hindenburg Research folded up after targeting IEP with a short and distort campaign. The price of IEP tanked from all the shorting. They were trying to get Icahn margin called because he took out a personal loan against his shares to “give them something they’ll never forget”. HBC had the lawsuit dismissed based on information that was redacted in the public filing so the alleged death spiral appears to have been arranged on behalf of Icahn, according to banned anon.

>>61152341
This talking point is outdated as the currently trading (actionable) company distributed a dividend using the CUSIP-6 of the cancelled company.

>>61152464
Don't listen to anyone when investing money. What is he retarded?

>>61152414
> Who's saying you can't say MOASS?
Literally the people on your team or at least who you agree with if you’re just a regular anon who is too stupid to notice patterns.
>>61128873
>>61129269
>>61133422

You people, and I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt by presuming you’re a paid stock basher and not just dumber than a bag of donkey dicks, you people can’t even keep your talking points and logic consistent throughout one thread, let alone from thread to thread. How can you hope to prevail against autism?

>>61152464
Sounds like stupid runs in your veins

>>61152207
>First question: Did you own BBBYQ before the company went bankrupt?
No
>>61152341
>if he got his original BBBYQ investment back
I am insulted at being accused as a BBBaggie.

so let me get this straight, RC (Ryan Cohen, the CEO of GameStop) buys 7,780,000 shares of BBBY, and $60-$80 strike calls worth 1,670,100 shares in March 2022, Reddit censors any and all talk about this, then RC sells his shares and calls in august 2022. Then RC has a sit down meeting with the worlds most famous corporate raider - Carl Icahn - in October 2022. Then with his (presumably) new guidance offered by Icahn, RC offers to buy BBBY for 400m during December 2022. Then one month later, January 2023, the worlds most prestigious M&A analysis software, which costs 4 figures + per month, lists the company BBBY as SOLD. Then one month later in Feb 2023, RC posts:

https://x.com/ryancohen/status/1625507240831553537?lang=en

“someone tell the government to stop shooting down my balloons”, clearly alluding to government regulatory agencies holding up his behind the scenes M&A activity. Then BBBY files for chapter 11 during April 2023, and 8 months later, after bbby shares had already been "cancelled", a GameStop board member - Larry Cheng - who helped Ryan Cohen build Chewy goes onto an obscure podcast dedicated to discussing reorganization and recovery theories for BBBY, which is also attended by Pulte, another figure RC has spent quite a bit of time with. Ryan Cohen is also listed as a creditor and debtor to the BBBY chapter 11.

But somehow all of this is met with an immense barrage of whining from posters who beg the jannies to censor it, and claim that it is somehow "off topic"

Quite.
Peculiar.

>>61152564
adding onto this, the most famous company to have ever battled naked short sellers in the press and the courts, was OverStock. It is fair to say that OverStock HATES naked short sellers. This same OverStock is the majority owner of tzero - a company that is licensed by the SEC to offer securities on a blockchain - and is also the same company who purchased the BBBY IP and is now trading once again under the same ticker BBBY. Also the warrants being issued by Overstock (now trading as BBBY) line up closely with the GME warrants, and on top of that the warrant CUSIP-6 uses the same CUSIP-6 that the legacy BBBYQ used, which only has one possible legal interpretation - that legacy BBBYQ entity is still active.

Interesting.

>>61152564
>immense barrage of whining from posters who beg the jannies to censor it, and claim that it is somehow "off topic"
This is actually the most interesting development. The shills are 100% a useful barometer to pay attention to and they clearly don't want the hivemind putting the pieces together. Hence why the fight so viciously about sequestering us off. These same people were doing this back in 2023 as well.
That's just my interpretation of things.

>>61152580
At this point, they are literally gaslighting us into thinking the sky is red. I will concede that the shilling was actually rather robust and sophisticated. After two years you can see the game-plan start to take shape. But in hindsight they did a great job in fudding Lemonis and BYON. When BYON quite abrupty turns in BBBY with all of the trapping we are basically unofficially risen from the dead. Reuniting the NOLs is nothing but a formality at this point and that will be announced AFTER the ink has dried on the paper, not before.
RC won. He's our generation's Warren Buffet.

>>61151012
>Refuses to discuss evidence
What evidence? The only real evidence in that post >>61146596 is a link to a pdf about CUSIPS. Outside that, all the other instances of of "Evidence" is someone telling them they're flooding a thread about /GME/. And they got deleted because they breaking 4chans rules by flooding the "SHOW ME AND EXAMPLE" posts.

This is unironically textbook schizo-behavior "OH NO IM BEING SUPRESSED, I MUST BE CORRECT". If you are actively serious about this belief (which I doubt you are), you're doing more harm to your rhetoric than good by being obstinate and shitting up unrelated threads.

>your team
kek, the pot is calling the kettle nigger.

>Boomers do not understand the Streisand effect.
Jews still to this day do not understand the power of pattern recognition aka noticing.

>>61152877
You just can’t stop lying can you? It’s like it’s in your blood or something. Everyone can check the archive for themselves and see that you are lying.

Banned anon was banned from both threads for the information they were sharing. Why weren’t the other posts deleted? Only the one with the information that must not be shared was deleted. Same thing for the other thread. Only the post sharing the information that your team is trying to hide was deleted. I don’t know why you keep trying. No one is falling for it. You have been noticed. The harder you fight the more obvious it becomes.

None of you, absolutely none of you, are willing to discuss the substance of what was shared and that is why you make it obvious that you’re coordinating a containment op.

Wow sure is a lot of off topic BBBYQ spam in here. Good thing the people spamming are annoying as fuck apamming liars which means I know to never buy a share of it.

>>61151289
Vampires
>eat blood
>can't see themselves in a mirror.
Jews
>eat blood
>no ability to self reflect and everything is someone else's fault
Hansel and gretel was about a jew.

>>61152962
>None of you, absolutely none of you, are willing to discuss the substance of what was shared and that is why you make it obvious that you’re coordinating a containment op.
its because I dont care about /BBBY/, I am invested in /GME/ therefore I go to /GME/ to consume GME related material. All "evidence" posted by that has very little to do with GME.

Has anyone confirmed yet that any of the gme warrants can be DRS'd yet? I know fidelity is being an ass about it, but what about schwab or ikbr?

>>61152580
>>61152619
GUYS HOLY SHIT RC IS GOING TO DO A MERGER WITH CHEWY BEFORE BUYING MCDONALDS BECAUSE HE EATS THEIR ICE CREAM.

CAN ANYONE SAY "IVERMECTIN ICE CREAM"? YUM YUM!

>>61153024
I'll ask schwab

Ever since this new spam posting started, I've noticed considerably less gme bashing and kek baggie posting. Must be a coincidence.

I could have invested in literally anything and made money. However I invested in GME and am not even breaking even.

Literally retards at my work are better traders than me and they don’t even know what a “derivative” is.

>>61153050
I've noticed too. I also notice when there is less faggot spam, there's more baggies posting. So vice versa.

>>61153052
Did they scare you from buying sub $20?

>>61153024
You don’t seem to understand that every time you people try this you just expose yourself further. All you had to do is shut the fuck up. All you have to do is shut the fuck up. And you’re simply not capable of doing it because you’re convinced that you can do more good for yourself than harm by trying to manage the threads. For 4 years you retards pumped out propaganda to “forget about GameStop” because you’re too stupid to understand that shutting the fuck up is your best strategy and now you’re doing it all over again.

>Please just stay focused on the warrants that are already irrelevant because we stuffed them into ETFs to conjure up liquidity same as we do for shares, while we have brokers run interference and prevent you from DRSing
>Stay focused on what we have contained
>Do not speculate about the blockchain
>Do not investigate the blockchain
>We know what’s best for you
>Do not look at the data
>Do not notice the opportunity
>We will ruin the thread if you step outside our Overton window
>DAE le heckin digits is chance of MOASS today?
Honestly it’s just insulting. It’s like someone trying to jingle keys in front of your face to distract and amuse you as if you were a baby. It’s hard to believe this shit ever worked on boomers but then again boomers are boomers.

>>61153101
>>61153139
>gme thread
>discuss gme
>"no I don't want to speculate on different companies like bbby"
>OMG UR EXPOSING URSELF OMG PAID SHILL HOLY CRAP UR A MARKET MANIPULATOR PAID SHILL TRYING TO TALK ABOUT GME IN THE GME THREAD DISCORD COORDINATING SPAMMERS (add another paragraph of spam)
This only works on the couple people that happen to stumble by this thread, and not anyone who has been browsing for years. You are not getting your money back for investing in a now bankrupt company. If you did trust ryan, you would have exited the trade when he did, and not followed it into bankruptcy.

wen warrant moass?

>>61153024
>Has anyone confirmed yet that any of the gme warrants can be DRS'd yet? I know fidelity is being an ass about it, but what about schwab or ikbr
excellent question. in fact this might be the only thing that matters right now.
>>61153036
tyfys anon. please report back.

i have warrants in several brokers, i will try to drs them and see what happens.

>>61153101
But anon, this is their job. Would you go to your boss and report back that the best option for accomplishing the company goals is to terminate you and all of your work buddies? They have to pretend this is important the same way any corporate lackey has to pretend their job is important. You are witnessing their wagie dance.

>>61153147
>GME will see price discovery by relisting on blockchain
>Shut up shut up shut up off topic reeeeee jannies shut it down reeeeeee

>>61153188
I know. But if they weren’t so retarded they would understand that their best option is to completely ignore what they want to get buried and instead slide the thread with comfyposting. They’re talking to a thread full of autistic gamers and it never occurred to them to strike up a conversation about retro games? It’s just shoddy workmanship. Nobody has any pride in their work anymore.

>>61153205
Not what I said and you are further proving my intuition right that I should not listen to people if they are spammy faggots :)

>>61153232
Yes we know that you don’t want to talk about GME on the blockchain and what will happen to make that possible so instead you choose to fight a straw man. It’s all you people do.

You know they’re going to kill you before they’ll let you testify, right? Loose ends and all that.

>>61153285
Don't put words in my mouth, FAGGOT.

>22 PBTID trying to prevent people from discussing GME’s future on the blockchain and the current actionable public information related to the company that owns that blockchain
>Look I’m one of you I say faggot a lot tee hee
We deserve better psyops. Go watch some YouTube videos about retro games, take notes, and next time try to slide with that. I’m bored with you retards and I’m not going away.

>Live tomorrow
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Frmrr28yp15wf1.png

>>61153334
TBPN

>>61153188
>>61153139
are you actually suggesting that gme warrants are now irrelevant?

>>61153165
I am surprised there isnt a definite answer yet, like its pretty well known theres sketch all around but not a lot of answers on what options are available.

>>>61153232
Its fascinating watching them crank up the "no u" slider to the max. I bet they don't even understand the ramifications of pic related while they pretend they've participated for the last 5 years.

>>61153334
>>61153336
>>61153337
oh shit, I wonder if hes gonna talk about the future of powerpacks

>>61153336
ooo I wonder what he will say. His appearances are rare.
>>61153339
Keep projecting retard I'm sure it will work out lol.
>accuse the enemy of what you are doing -karl marx

>>61153361
im on your side dawg, the threads have devolved to "no-u" posting ever since the warrants were announced, its like the only form of crowd control that has any staying power mostly because of plausible deniability
>> real gme holders are aroused by pic related and towels dont know why

>>61153339
>>61153347
>>61153361
textbook mischaracterization and damage control. (You)'re putting in a lot of work this weekend.

>>61153336
ooo I wonder what he will say. His appearances are rare.
>>61153377
oops my bad sorry.
>pic
KEK

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1EKTw50Uf8M
high speed zombie

>>61153337
apparently its just a youtube channel that does tech stuff, an interesting choice to do a interview on. I saw this post on reddit though which made me laugh.

>>61153384
my ptbid really speak for themselves

>>61153336
>Good Morning everyone! Moass NOW!
>*leaves*
>>61153339
>>61153377
STOP THESE ARE ILLEGAL IMAGES SAR

>Ryan sits down in front of the microphone
>clears his throat and pauses for dramatic effect
>leans in close and breathes heavily into the microphone
>"uh...kek baggies"
>MOASS starts instantly at 20 million
>57 recorded roof jumpings the first day
>World War 3 starts with weeks in

>>61153339
They put warrants in ETFs to create synthetic liquidity so there will be no price discovery. DTCC will not exercise the warrants they have because that pays GME and lets them know when the warrants are all gone which exposes their cooked books. So yes the warrants are now irrelevant. If you weren’t too stupid to notice patterns you would have figured out by now that the whole purpose of the warrants is to bait the DTCC into literally committing fraud by stealing from GME the cash due from shareholder exercise in order to hide their cooked books. GME’s future is on the blockchain, the next round of warrants will be on the blockchain, and that is when the DTCC gets reamed. Warrants are check, not checkmate. In the meantime there is an actionable trade related to GME provably in the process of a merger due to a smoking gun and you’re at best too stupid to see it or at worst part of the team managing these threads to try to trick retards who lack pattern recognition and reasoning abilities. Why do you think the paid stock bashers are focused solely on burying banned anon’s research in a flood of shit?
>file name sasuga

>>61153445
>fudding the warrants

I miss when the threads were comfy. Too many posters with very desperate energy these days.

>>61153471
sell!!!!!11!!!!11!!!!1!!!

>>61153453
>zero reading comprehension
What part of they put the warrants in ETFs to create synthetic liquidity by abusing the creation/redemption process same as they do for GME shares don’t you understand? It’s right here:

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61073371#p61080787

Why do you think the brokers are refusing to DRS warrants even though GME’s prospectus and Computershare both allow it. DTCC is going to hoard the warrants to protect their fraudulent accounting which forces them to steal money from GME. The warrants are just bait.

>>61153471
>Manic depression is a frustrating mess

Any new copium or hype dates this week?

>>61153498
>So yes the warrants are now irrelevant.
That's all I sneeded to read. Gots me million dollar warrants.

>>61153568
Buy as many warrants as you want. I’d like to be wrong but I’m not. I’d like to see the brokers agree to start DRSing warrants but they won’t. You really think the system is just going to fold out of the goodness of their hearts? As long as warrants are trading off exchange (60% off exchange volume already) and included in ETFs, there will be no price discovery. That only changes if DRS starts going through but it’s been 2 weeks already and all the brokers are still refusing.

GameStop gave the DTCC enough rope to hang themselves. That’s the purpose of this round of warrants. It’s just bait to force the DTCC to literally steal from GameStop in order to protect their fraudulent accounting. Buying and exercising warrants is necessary to prove it. But the warrants aren’t going to silly numbers unless and until brokers allow investors to DRS their warrants.

>>61153621
This guy is retarded and almost always wrong. It doesn’t mean anything that the exchange codes match. As for the FIGI codes, only the first 6 digits out of 12 digits match and third digit is always G (stands for global). The last 6 digits are completely different. At best it’s mildly interesting that FIGI digits 1,2,4,5, and 6 match between the two warrants but it doesn’t necessarily mean anything. They could be assigned based on distribution date for instance.

I'm starting to think warrants were a psyop

>>61153702
I assume RC is already prepping legal action due to his own broker mishandling the corporate actions he approved. I wonder if he will mention anything in his media appearance, or will focus on the business side of gamestop.

He probably won't mention the warrant mishandling for legal reasons. Brokers are committing open fraud with the warrant situation.

>>61153702
>This guy is retarded and almost always wrong. It doesn’t mean anything that the exchange codes match. As for the FIGI codes, only the first 6 digits out of 12 digits match and third digit is always G (stands for global). The last 6 digits are completely different. At best it’s mildly interesting that FIGI digits 1,2,4,5, and 6 match between the two warrants but it doesn’t necessarily mean anything. They could be assigned based on distribution date for instance.
sure thing bud

They’re afraid.

https://x.com/Hey_ross/status/1979902421754347935

It’s all coming together.

Guys how will we recover if the towel nigger end up being right?

>>61153906
you won't and that's a good thing

>guys i didn't fully trust cohen
>i only half trusted him
>i'm still going to wagmi.. right?
no refunds

>>61153621
what an idiot. Sounds like a BBBY enjoyer.

>>61153471
same. i hope you are having a comfy day/night anon. wagmi.

>Chase
>As the government shutdown drags on, we’re working hard to help our communities and our customers, just as we do whenever they are struggling. And we’re looking at other ways that we – and you – can help.
>Please help us get the word out to your friends, neighbors and family hurt by the shutdown, to call our Special Care Line at 888-356-0023. We’re here to help our customers, whether they’re a government worker, a government contractor or simply an employee at the diner across from a shuttered federal office.
Oh yeah time to ask for 6 months of deferred credit card payments.

>>61154078
Based

Kek dumbfuck crypto baggies.

>>61154255
>>61154255
>>61154255
Threaded.