>>61158633
Cities have the highest birthrates, not the lowest.
Rural areas = Higher age bracket
Part of the consequence of birth rates tanking & demographic decline is a gradual recession of the countryside. Ie, a geographical displacement where smaller population centres dry up and blow away, while already big ones absorb whatever is left over. The cities will become larger and larger, as the rural areas leech people over time. Less work opportunities, less skills coverage, less women to fugg. They have to move to the cities by necessity.
Here's some foid advice too:
People mostly have false expectations on rural women. If you happen to find a girl who is actually of a not-geriatric age, chances are they're a very plain and unassuming personality without much going for them. You might think this is good in comparison to whatever high strung BPD rape accusing whore you previously went out with, but you'll come to notice pretty quickly there's a decisive lack of 'spark' in their eyes. Rarely any ambition to do anything for themselves, just bumbling through life. Moreover, trying to get them to play the role of wife and homemaker might be more of a struggle than trying to pull a stubborn ox through mud.
We do not live in societies that raise women on the whole in a way that cultivate habits and manners that make them marriage material. Yes, that includes other parts of the world too. If you went to the most bumpkin part of south-east Asia and literally bought a girl from her father, its doubtful she herself knows the basics of how to even cook or clean. Latin America? Fat chance. A kinky haired pardo with deep set crocodile eyes who doesn't know shit about the world and has no curiosity to know about it. Those who DO cultivate these values in their children, you're more likely to find in high society, NOT from poor and/or rural parts.
[cont]
