Thread 61176808

Let's just assume LINK only continues to crab-dump leading up to and after Smartcon. Will you still hold into the new year?

>>61176808 (OP)
Of course, im never selling

1 LINK = 1.0432 LINK

>>61176808 (OP)
>Will you still hold into the new year?
I haven't held for 8 years just to sell now right? I'll hold forever until either $1000 or 0 there is no in between for me, I'd start the unstaking process at $500.

>>61176808 (OP)
buy the rumor sell the news. most of us are up 10000% from ico we have no reason to sell.

I'm only up a 10x over the last 7y of holding and i invested my inheritance into link at $11 so as long as its not going under that, im gucci and can hold for as long as it takes ngl

>>61176851
>>61176826
should have sold in 2021

>>61176879
If i sold in 2021 LINK would be atleast $2000 now and id be dead

>>61176808 (OP)
Man, looks like this scam shit should die faster than ever, so the bullrun and alt szn can finally resume.

>>61176851
What's the rumor?

>>61177619
that youre gay

>>61176826
Absolutely this

>>61176826
incredibly based.
I will be selling some of my .0432 LINK eventually

>>61176892
hilarious how the number keeps going up everytime this gets reposted

>>61176808 (OP)
This is the only project in the space that is positioned for a guaranteed 20-30x you keep fudding, I keep buying.

>>61180065
only thing guaranteed in this cruel world is my hatred of chainlink

>>61180065
I watched this several times, and although I didn't want to admit it at first, he's being sarcastic. He's also said elsewhere he's excited for *next* year's Smartcon (2026).

>>61180175
He absolutely was being sarcastic and joking around by throwing a date out there. Came here and saw all the autists, who are incapable of reading the room and sussing out subtlety and body language, rejoicing about Thanksgiving.

>>61180175
SWIFT is just joking about changing their messaging system

https://blog.chain.link/the-swift-and-chainlink-partnership/

>This integration, set to go live in November 2025, will allow over 11,000 banks to attach blockchain wallet addresses to payment messages, interact with smart contract oracles, and settle tokenized assets like digital bonds, equities, or stablecoins directly with blockchain systems. It builds on successful pilots from 2024, demonstrating secure data exchange and cross-chain transfers without replacing existing infrastructure

>>61180238
what happens when the date comes and nothing happens? will you admit you're a retard? or will you move the goalposts once again?

>>61176808 (OP)
>integrity dao candles look like they’re alive
>zoom in on dextools
>can almost hear them breathing
>this thing feeds on weak hands and caffeine fumes

>>61180238
please GOD 1000eoy this needs to be the year I'm drowning

>>61180238
What are linkcels gonna if this ends up releasing with chainlink, but the price still doesn't pump?

>>61180238
why would the network fee be "new" if there is already a fee paid in link from day one. is this another fee?

>>61180381
i think we're all at our end point, like i have to get a job again if it doesnt hit this november because im never selling. and thats exactly why sergey is coming through for us in exactly 30 days. WGMI friend, and if it doesnt happen, dont sell because thats exactly what they want. We are inevitable.

>>61180481
Its all fake bro look at how unnatural the lighting is on sir gays fat head

>>61180498
holy shit he's a CGI clone i just sold everything.

My cutoff date is 2045. Gives some time for the fourth industrial revolution to gain some steam.

>>61180238
Holy fucking shit boys. This one might really do something.

>>61180238
yeah and the thing is even if sergey was sarcastic, I saw Tom initiating the question and his remark about november so he DEFINITELY knows something

>>61180394
I'm going to kill myself

>>61180470
they're talking about the new MT swift standards which now includes a specific blockchain network fee if the message type you're using interacts with blockchains. It's new because obviously SWIFTs ancient messaging standards didn't account for blockchains. The fee likely covers gas costs + MAYBE chainlink ccip or oracle data fees (if being used)

>>61180394
gonna sell half of my liquid portion for a downpayment of a house

>>61176840
$1000 is fud

>>61176808 (OP)
You were meant to have dump a long time ago, sell it for XMN while you still have the chance

>>61180070
>my hatred of chainlink
sold for core and now they partnered with lock.

>>61181017
You know you can run your replies through chatgpt to make them grammatically relevant prior to your thirdie shitposting, right?

>>61180238
they might go live with the service, but the bank adoption thereof is pushed back because the market structure bill wasnt passed before the government shutdown
the fuddies will use this heavily on twitter to call link a failed project when nobody is using it on launch because or orange cheeto reasons

>>61180381
>this needs to be the year I'm drowning
exactly the feeling they want you to feel right before the take off in a few months

>>61182797
>already backtracking
>few more months guise
you know, karma is real

>>61180335
Wrong about what?

>>61180394
I 100% expect this to happen
Any LINK pump will be met with BTC price Armageddon

>>61182797
Amazing cope

>>61182797
Holy shit you are absolutely brainwashed my guy
What if Trump had lost the election? There would be no Genius Act or Market Structure Bill.
Would Chainlink have simply ceased operations?

>>61183445
>What if Trump had lost the election? There would be no Genius Act or Market Structure Bill.
>Would Chainlink have simply ceased operations?
You do realize Chainlink is the absolute backbone of Defi right? It has the most in-crypto adoption out of anything this side of Ethereum.

And if Trump had lost,, ll of crypto would have to do without institutional adoption. Not just Chainlink.

>>61183182
>>61183430
>>61183445
as predicted, seething about us .gov bullshit nobody can predict at this point

and yes if trump wasnt elected we would have none of this, crypto would still be radioactive for institutions and swift would never had all that publicity
its not that hard to grasp is it

I live off my staking rewards why would I ever sell?

>>61176808 (OP)
>smartCON
Wake up retards. They're literally telling you in plain sight that they're conning you in a smart way.

>>61176808 (OP)
I'm holding until 2031

>>61176826
For you maybe, the pool is closed for us.

>>61180394
I'll stack my LINK prices at $17 a pop and enjoy a cool 1000% annual ROI

>>61180636
Tom even said they'll have something to be thankful about in Thanksgiving, definitely hinting at something

>>61183445
>What if Trump had lost the election? There would be no Genius Act or Market Structure Bill.
There would be similar law with different names, this was obviously planned way ahead and lobbied to both parties

>>61176808 (OP)
15k in the pool, the rest will be sold

>>61180394
the next thing will be talked about. remember ccip? me neither

>>61184359
arbitrum - "add a zero". Weve been here a long time fren.

>>61184431
wen mixicles?

>>61176808 (OP)
Yes because the market bill will eventually pass and Sergey has already said 2025 and 2026 are the years.

>>61176851
i have a lot of reasons to sell. I want to preserve/ grow my money not be fat mans slush fund