Thread 61282457

Give me one reason I shouldn't put all my available capital in AI

>>61282457 (OP)
The video you provided isn't AI, you're a total retard that's why

>>61282457 (OP)
>Ai
That's not ai. That is robotics programming. Which is separate from even automation.

Not only that, but this is cpu processing.

>>61282457 (OP)
drones are cheap, but so are jammers

>>61282494
Target rich environment.

>>61282528
They use fiber cables idiot. Ziggers figured it out during the first months of Ukraine war since they were so easy to jam. Looks like you have some catching up to do

>>61282528
yep, jammers are one of the reasons why you should invest in AI
human pilots shouldn't be a thing

How are FPS games going to be any fun when irl warfare uses aim bots

>>61282569
The solution is clear: haptic feedback remote controlled quantum internet satellite feed 1:1 humanoid robots turning the Eastern Front into a deadlocked Robot Wars battle royale. Everyone has fun, everyone goes home to their families.

This is very much correct. Terminators hitting not almost every shot is ridiculous, they will have near 100% accuracy, and that is a lot scarier than the movie’s other robot tech features. A little gun on wheels can do more damage than a damn terminator.

>>61282544
>Object tracking bot on backpack. Spam the area with birdshot. Drones faggoty plastic parts fold like paper.
Now what?

>>61282592
Now go into the war threads and see how that goes for the ziggers

>>61282457 (OP)
>Give me one reason I shouldn't put all my available capital in AI
they will never pay dividends
all (non financial) profits will gen only top management

>>61282576
>Mfw companies are so cheap they hire some dude to stand by some unwieldy and old automation machine instead of putting a cent into the research that could produce a better, more reliable, easier maintained machine.

I think you're over estimating how stupid and lazy people are. There's usually an inverse correlation between being stupid vs lazy too.

>>61282592
there are flying claymore drones, big ass single-use shotguns pretty much
they only need to make 3-4 holes in you, after that there's no rush, die now, today, this week, who cares

>>61282596
Yes but think about how many people will want to buy it once it's priced as a utility

>>61282609
china will give same for free
install Telegram and add GigaChat for example

>>61282598
There's a few niche teams working on some interesting frontier advancements, plus most, if not all, the constituent parts already exist.

>There's usually an inverse correlation between being stupid vs lazy too.
W-what happens when we hit the inflection point?

>>61282553
>human pilots shouldn't be a thing
Yes, instead of carrying an anti-tank grenade, every $500 suicide drones should lug a RTX 5090 instead.

>>61282614
No no I assure you chat gpt is the best and can never be copied and will always be perfect

>>61282623
>chat gpt
once he become pay-walled he become shit and others over-perform em

>>61282457 (OP)
Because the toy in the video doesn't do what it claims to do. The YOLO library does, in fact track his face. The $5 servos controlled by the arduino on the left are not actually keeping up though, nor would they accurately align with the camera.

Finally, YOLO only works well at that range while it has a well lit face from one angle. It won't be able to do that tracking with shadows / objects moving in the background, etc.

>>61282478
YOLO is "AI", even though OpenCV motion detection with ByteTrack isn't and can do the same.

>>61282494
Not if it moves.

>>61282617
I appreciate the humour. Imo, the big weapons aren't coming from ai. Not technically, at least. Specifics matter here since ai as a sector isn't making much sense.

Simulations are one thing that can help deploy from theory. The issue is that we don't live in sanitized pods. So repairs are expensive. You have to justify 1 robot being cheaper or equal the cost of at least other person.

Since we're speculating I might as well throw in my schizo ramble. I think a lot of miltech is or should be disposable.

Getting small things to kill big things is about where we're at.
Which is closer to a focus on bioweapons than to machines and robotics.

>>61282457 (OP)
>we're building AI specifically for the purpose of bullseyeing chinese in the forehead
kinda based, ngl

>>61282528
This isn't jammable.

>>61282584
You said a lot and nothing.

>>61282592
Very hard to have clearance over your head/arms without throwing you way off-balance. You moving will fuck most standard motion-detection application, so you are left with AI, which isn't trained to detect drones or humans outside of very particular, well-lit environments.

If you guys have questions on drones/drone defense systems, I can answer.

140k before eoy btw, gov reopens, liquidity, lower rates, blah blah

>>61282584
The infiltrator class of terminators were the most effective because they're the only terminators who can get close to humans hiding out

>>61282657
>B4 bioweapons being doomer.

It's the best option right now because it can incapacitate without being or intending on being lethal. Unlike kenetic energy.

Which leads to other issues. Like, what do you do when you can just be knocked unconscious? Debt bondage is better than death but I'm unsure if a global society that functions that way is going to be a pleasant one. if that be where the chips fall.

>>61282661
>market reaction to war footage of red star cap wearing bucktoothed zipper heads getting mowed down by Boston Dynamics clanker dogs with bolt on M249s

>>61282457 (OP)
it's not AI and there is no guarantee that AGI is even possible

>>61282714
>Like, what do you do when you can just be knocked unconscious? Debt bondage is better than death but I'm unsure if a global society that functions that way is going to be a pleasant one. if that be where the chips fall.
Not even sure what you're saying

>>61282766
>You do or say something I dislike.
>I press button.
>You go to sleep.
>Wake up in a cold, dark cell waiting for sentencing.

To fit the theme of the thread I'll conjure bigger picture scifi. Ignore the above text to indulge further.
> Breaking news! "Big death killing violent stab shoot? Much death. Drugs mayhaps?!?! War drugs! War on something! War!"

>Key figure in a foreign government start disappears. No change happens. It was like they never needed a state head.

>Major news break! "Blah blahblah we're seeing some spectacle over here! Look at this MEGA VIOLENCE!"

> An entire governing wing of a foreign country disappears. Yet, no chaos. No urgency. Everything continues like normal.

If you can't intuitively understand what I just typed then I refuse to believe you're American.
I don't write the rules.

>detonates an EMP before engaging
heh nothing personal

>>61282903
> EMP
With what? You are going to solar flare or airburst nuke individual trenches?

>>61282912
nuclear weapon constricted for remove cities
tranches will die without water and food for free

>>61282457 (OP)

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-90Ak8KnwrQ

they already tried this over 40 years ago, and stopped because there are billions of edge cases out in combat that render them useless
some dust obscures the camera and suddenly your corporal gets domed by a robot that thinks hes chinese