McCrispy Strips are a Fail - /ck/ (#21396390) [Archived: 1691 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/11/2025, 3:51:39 AM No.21396390
IMG_3533
IMG_3533
md5: 36f1300370994aceafa810c1bfd98117🔍
What went so wrong?
Replies: >>21396494 >>21396498 >>21396527 >>21396625
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 3:54:39 AM No.21396396
Who the fuck cares
Replies: >>21396428
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:16:25 AM No.21396428
IMG_3498
IMG_3498
md5: 0db3bf44396dbb7e734f77f32fd00ce5🔍
>>21396396
A lot of people
Replies: >>21396438
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:28:30 AM No.21396438
>>21396428
wrong
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:29:31 AM No.21396439
first of all, chicken selects. that's what went wrong. its too late now. they left when no one ask them to, so now burn.
Replies: >>21396447
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:33:27 AM No.21396447
>>21396439
>its too late now.
Precisely. The chicken sandwich wars drove too much innovation for fried chicken tenders, and here's McDs 5 years later giving it a poor attempt.

I think they're relying on the familiarity for the poors and fats and just not trying actual food.
Replies: >>21396459
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:40:31 AM No.21396459
>>21396447
Why cant Mcdicks get its new chicken right? The new sandwich was a fail, these are etc...
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:54:10 AM No.21396494
>>21396390 (OP)
Man I like the chicken strips, however every time I order them I get ones that seem to be freshly cooked so I'm sure some people out there are getting bad ones
Also even when I tell them to straight up burn the french fries they still give me limp ones, I'm going insane
Replies: >>21396503
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:55:55 AM No.21396498
>>21396390 (OP)
*failure

No more Mcds threads, shill.
Replies: >>21396524
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:57:38 AM No.21396503
>>21396494
You expect fucking mcdonalds to make you special crispy fries? Where did you get so entitled? lol, what an idiot. Don't eat there. Do better.
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 4:57:45 AM No.21396504
I don't know what's wrong with these companies anymore. it's just a chicken tender i've been eating these things since I was a kid. They didn't have to do any work to develop them they could have just bought them from some company.
Replies: >>21396640
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 5:06:30 AM No.21396524
>>21396498
Yes a company would sure love negative publicity!
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 5:07:37 AM No.21396527
>>21396390 (OP)
It wasn't crispy I feel like the branding was bad already. I know it's going off the name of the sandwich but I was disappointed it was far from crispy but it was tasty enough. Probably good in a wrap.
Replies: >>21396535
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 5:13:52 AM No.21396535
>>21396527
They were gross the breading sucked, it wasnt crisp. Just meh
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 6:30:31 AM No.21396625
>>21396390 (OP)
They should have just re-released the Selects.
Replies: >>21396633
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 6:40:10 AM No.21396633
>>21396625
it was probably a cost savings thing
Anonymous
6/11/2025, 6:44:38 AM No.21396640
>>21396504
>spend R&D time to figure out what people eat
>make product line and sink huge amounts of money into it
>product doesn't sell well
>number doesn't go up
>product is considered a failure

I really fucking hate corporate think. That ford vs dodge case really needs to be wiped out. Something like eating has no real profits in the end, but they'll try to gamble on trends.