Allulose tastes exactly like sugar with no aftertaste or bitterness.
We've been searching for a non caloric, 0 glycemic index sweetener for 100 years and finally found it.
Why is it not everywhere already?
They're still putting that stevia crap in everything and it tastes like dogshit.
>inb4 it's not natural
That's correct, but excess sugar is way way worse than any side effect allulose could possibly have.

idk sucralose is fine for me

>>21410594
its fine but kinda hollow

>>21410592 (OP)
there is a giant, unseen space dick waiting to rocket down to earth and into your ass with this product. just like stevia, sucralose, aspartame, and any other compound. we don't know what, we don't know how, give it 10 years.

all this being said: it's probably better than stevia, and it would have to make mfers drop dead on the spot to be worse than aspartame and sucralose.

also, sugar alcohols suck, e.g. malitol

>>21410608
The majority of approved artificial sweeteners have zero notable health concerns, and many of them have been around so long that if they were as deadly as health-anxiety bloggers said, we'd have a mass die off that would destroy civilization.
And sugar is so bad for you that any side effects of other sweeteners would have to clear a high as fuck threshold to actually be worse than it.

its a bit expensive
erythritol is 1/3rd the price

>>21410626
that shit is really bad for you.

>>21410634
not really
since they dont readily absorb into your body they have some laxative effects but you just dont eat huge quantities and its fine

>>21410635
the stuff in the op is not a sugar alcohol.

It’s better to use real sugar and simply moderate your diet to not be regularly sweet in every meal. Done, simple as

>>21410594
sucralose makes my ass sneeze

>>21410641
It's better to not use sweeteners. What are you, 6 year olds?

It's the best tasting artificial sweetener, but it's relatively expensive. That's why it's not more common.

I like to make country wine and mead. If ever I want something to be just slightly sweet (in jargon terms, off-dry) I use allulose to get there. There are other, better methods for adding heavier doses of sweetness using real sugars.

As for whether artificial sweeteners are bad for one's health, I think they are, but slightly. They won't give you ligma or space cancer. They will stimulate a small insulin release without any sugar to be metabolized, which can gradually increase insulin resistance over time, and tends to make you more hungry, partially negating the calorie benefit.

>>21410656
In other words, like most things health related, the answer to "Are artificial sweeteners worse than sugar?" is a great big "it depends." If you're fat, no. If you're diabetic, no. Otherwise probably yes.

>>21410592 (OP)
>but excess sugar is way way worse than any side effect allulose could possibly have.
I've heard this oen before

>>21410661
most articles about allulose or erythritol actually say they dont raise blood sugar levels
and most sources say insulin is produced as the pancreas reacts to blood sugar levels

I heard tasting sweet things is supposed to impact it somehow but it seems unimportant to actual blood sugar levels.

to me its just a common sense dieting method. You avoid sugars for obvious reasons, that makes you crave sweet things. Artificial sweeteners make that craving go away and you manage your calories intake as a result without being depressed/moody or something.

>>21410669
You're not understanding the mechanism I'm talking about. I'm not suggesting allulose will raise your blood sugar level, but the opposite. Tasting sweetness causes a small preemptive or anticipatory insulin release as your body prepares to metabolize sugar. If no sugar comes along (because you were consuming artificial sweetener) the extra insulin you secreted will cause a short-term *drop* in your blood sugar. This stimulates hunger, and metabolic compensatory mechanisms "notice" that you produced excess insulin, and they compensate for this by becoming more resistant to the insulin signal. This insulin resistance over time encourages the development of diabetes.

Artificial sweeteners are partially self-defeating. People consume them hoping to avoid diabetes and extra calories, but the artificial sweeteners encourage insulin resistance and make people hungrier so they consume more total calories.

>>21410592 (OP)
The less sweet stuff you eat the sweeter everything tastes

>>21410594
STOP ingesting sucralose NOW
Sucralose is PROVEN to cause DNA DAMAGE to intestines
it's giving you ASS CANCER
I wouldn't touch the mystery chemical shit in the OP either, just use sugar occasionally. You don't need sweets every day.

>>21410592 (OP)
>Allulose tastes exactly like sugar
I have tried every fake sugar made, and NONE of them taste anything like sugar, and ALL of them have a nasty after taste. yours will be no different.

buy an ad.

IMHO the best way to use artificial sweeteners is by using them as an augmentation to actual sugar.

>>21410592 (OP)
D-mannose is the truly superior sweetener

>>21410592 (OP)
>all
>u
>lose

Yeah... not eating that.

>>21411122
>Cleanses the bladder

Claims like this need outlawed.

>>21410755
If there was proof, you would have posted it, but you didn't post proof.

>>21410634
It's not.
>ib4 those studies
I guarantee you didn't actually read the paper because if you did you would see that it doesn't actually say what you think it does

>>21411138
based inductive reasoner

>>21410592 (OP)
With Allulose
U All Lose

>>21411305
*spreads ass*
how's that for proof?

>>21410610
>The majority of approved artificial sweeteners have zero notable health concerns
The people that approved them are the same people that approved Oxicodone, Vioxx, Red40, BHA, Brominated seed oils and pushed DNA-altering experimental “vaccines” on 5 year olds.

>>21411388
Concession accepted

>>21410592 (OP)
D-Psicose (C6H12O6), also known as D-allulose or simply allulose, is an epimer of fructose that is used by some commercial food and beverage manufacturers as a low-calorie sweetener

>low calorie, not zero calorie.

>>21411394
>and pushed DNA-altering experimental “vaccines” on 5 year olds.
To be fair, there was a mass hysteria event taking place on planet Earth at the time. Sadly, it had nothing to do with female hysteria.

>>21411566
If they went out into the street during the “hysteria” and killed a single person through criminal negligence they would be in prison.
Rejecting Scientific Method, free speech, their sworn oaths, Nuremberg code, and common sense; in favour of reading pamphlets distributed by Pfizer and co is most certainly criminal negligence.

>>21410592 (OP)
glycine is sweet

>>21410592 (OP)
>Allulose tastes exactly like sugar with no aftertaste or bitterness.

What the fuck kinda of sugar you've been eating?

>>21412450
lots of artificial sweeteners have an off taste
like erythritol is pretty good, but it has thing cooling effect thats odd
stevia and such have like a bitter aftertaste

>>21412453
Ironically, this is why erythritol and stevia are often combined.

>>21411118
When I get a diet coke from the fountain at work I'll add a little spritz of regular coke or root beer and it makes all the difference in the world.