could you do it, /ck/?

maybe the steak by itself, but that huge potato, a half loaf of bread, a salad, and a bunch of raw kale and jalapenos? no chance in hell

>>21434439 (OP)
Could I? I don't know. Probably not.

Would I? No. Because even if I could it would be a miserable experience.

I did this with a tomahawk steak once. I also somewhat regularly eat 2+ lb steaks with milk and a good amount of side dishes. If you're over 6 feet, have had to bulk at some point in your life, and don't have to gorge on a bunch of filler shit then this isn't that big of a deal

No, I would feel disgusting after

>>21434439 (OP)
I'm not reading all that. Bring on the steak.

>>21434443
>maybe the steak by itself

Yeah, I could easily eat the steak and potato in an hour but I don't want the other shit and that's only there to trick people into losing.

"Oh you didn't eat the bowl of ketchup so you lose! Pay up!"

>>21434439 (OP)
yes, very easily
>inb4 the sides
i know about the sides. still EZ

>>21434439 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuqPL6X-aCc

>2kg
Probably not. Well if my life depended on it, or if I had prep time to distend the stomach, then yes. But otherwise, no, I am not a glutton.

>>21434439 (OP)
I did something like this when I was like in my early 20s. I looked specifically for one where I wasn't required to eat sides. I got the steak as rare as possible and just inhaled it. I couldn't do it now though.

>>21434995
>distend the stomach
this is why females are actually the world's greatest competitive eaters.

the pro ones train all year round, so once a year they can get pregnant and let their stomachs stretch for about 6 months. then they just stick an alka-seltzer up there to kill it but now they're ready to eat like 4kgs of hot dogs or giant steaks or whatever

nah not with those sides

>can't share the steak after you fail
why the fuck would they say this? They're still getting seventy two bucks off me even if i buy the thing planning to fail and split it
That's probably more than they'd get if I bought two separate steaks

>>21435097
they're the ones taking the risk anon.

>>21435097
I assume it's to prevent large parties of like 6 people from showing up and just ordering the steak and sides and sharing it which would be like 1/3 the price of if 5 people ordered individually

>>21435097
Stops you from ordering it for a table, taking one bite and then deciding you've finished your attempt, and then share with the table.

The rest of the steaks on their menu are $1.50-4 per ounce.
The 72oz challenge is $1 per ounce.

So yeah, it's so you don't abuse it for a cheap meal for a group.

>>21434439 (OP)
yeah, but I would hate life.

>>21435302
oh nm, I could do the steak nothing else.

OY DO YOU HAVE A LOICENSE FOR DIS HERE COMPETITION THREAD?!? THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COOKING AT ALL AND COULD NEVER LEAD TO AN INTERESTING THREAD

im not going to let them treat me like a slave with all those rules. i would not allow them to belittle me like that

>>21434896
one of the most disgusting videos i've ever seen

>>21434439 (OP)
>You are allowed to take one bite to decide if it's cooked to your satisfaction
Take one bite
Waitress this is overcooked make it again