>>21463186Shut up.
>>21463179 (OP)It varies region to region. We weren't a unified country until after the introduction of tomato and tomato want fully accepted in all of its constituent kingdoms. Even in Naples/The Two Sicilies, where tomato was first accepted in use, there are still many, MANY dishes eaten to this day that don't have any. Neapolitan cuisine in particular has several savoury custards eaten as sauces for pasta (like carbonara, which supposedly is from Rome; that never made sense to me since Naples has several savoury custards and Rome had this one, single thing that popped up outta nowhere 80 years ago? Yeah, nah).
There's also the white versions of dishes that are better-known for their use of tomato, such as Bolognese (again, despite the claims otherwise, Bolognese sauce with tomato originated in Naples and not Bologna; theirs didn't have tomato and was just mince, aromatics and milk until just over a century ago), lasagne, cacciatora and others. There's genovese, which is an onion-based sauce. There are oil (or lard) based pasta toppings, such as pasta with broccoli or pasta with tinned fish (tuna or sardines are most popular). And so on and so on and so on.