if authentic mexican tacos taste better why are white people tacos more popular?
taco bell(white people tacos) is the most popular taco place in the world

>>21473172 (OP)

>>21473172 (OP)
Nobody gives a fuck about tacos one way or another outside of the Americas.

>>21473172 (OP)

What a moron, nice bait tho. fag.

>>21473172 (OP)
>why are white people tacos more popular?
Tex-Mex is what ended up spreading to the rest of the world because of Americanization
>Taco Bell
stop

>>21473172 (OP)
Ad populum fallacy
Theres many reasons why a majority can like an inferior or bad thing over a better thing, such as:
People are dumb
People are stupid
People are retarded
People are idiots
People suck
People are lame
People are fools
and more

>>21474354
Is calling everything a fallacy a trend right now or something? I swear you faggots just popped up out of nowhere.

>>21473172 (OP)
>Korea doesn't have Mexico on its border thus no real access to Authentic Mexican© food.
>Feed them muttslop version of Messycan food
>Koreans act in kind and show enjoyment not to hurt feelings
We did it again, America! We're the BEST EVER!!!!

USA! USA! USA! USA!

>>21474373
please go back, you have to go back.

>>21474378
>the truth hurt him
kek

>>21474384
no no, it's nothing like that. you just act like a weird fag and it's off putting.
i think you know where you need to go back.

>>21474437
I think you need to be less thin skinned. Get some durability into it... instead of it being so plain and generic, I think you know what I mean.

>>21474366
>Ad hominem

>>21474443
i bet you use "..." a lot when typing don't you lol

>>21474451
Mmmm...sometimes. yeah... why?

>>21474366
it is the intellectual crutch of pedants and pseud's

>>21474366
>>21474459
Regardless, if the logic of an argument or line of thinking is inherently flawed, it is necessary and useful to point out the fallacies involved.

>>21474515
found the pseud

>>21474518
anon you must recognize my genius

i appreciate when anons call out fallacies instead of letting them slide

an argument containing a fallacy doesn't invalidate the argument, just so you know

>>21473266
>*outside of North America
FTFY

>>21473175
Mmm mm I sure do love authentic flavor while listening to my favorite virtue signal.

>>21474534
it does

>>21474366
No, it's standard internet argument protocol. You just don't usually see it on this board because everyone is too busy fapping to fast food slop and arguing over what food is good/bad subjectively.

Because /ck/ rarely ever features facts, there isn't a big need to point out when someone is presenting a shit argument (or no argument at all in your case).

>>21474354
>Theres many reasons
Did you fail first grade grammar?

>>21473172 (OP)
Cilantro is a big filter for people. And it features in the "authentic" version.

Second, Mexicans SUCK at cooking beef properly. They are literal ass at it. Chicken, pork, and seafood they have down, but when it comes to beef they overcook it all. Results in Americans, who know better, fixing that shit right up. So while there may be better authentic versions, it's still handicapped by Mexico's shit cooking habits for beef.

Also not everyone wants to blast their tongues off and shit out fire. So mild = more popular. This is probably the biggest reason.

>>21474559
>you don't usually see it
That's my point... I know you struggle with reading so I'll sum it up for you. I essentially asked "Why is everyone bringing up fallacies all of a sudden?"

>>21474565
>"There's many reasons" is a phrase that is often used in informal speech, and it is considered grammatically correct on imageboards such as 4chan, especially in the subreddit known as /ck/

mexicans are too impatient to cook ground beef

>>21474550
AI Overview
The fallacy fallacy, also known as argument from fallacy or fallacist's fallacy, is the error of assuming that an argument's conclusion must be false because the argument itself contains a logical fallacy. Just because someone uses flawed reasoning doesn't automatically mean their conclusion is wrong; it simply means their justification is flawed.

>>21474616
nooooo, but calling out fallacies was our get out of argument free card!!!

>>21474616
>>21474639
The 'fallacy noticing' dismantles the argument, but doesnt necessarily disprove the conclusion.
There would need to be new arguments put forth to justify belief in any asserted conclusions.

>>21473172 (OP)
Best thing about the states is you can get good brown people tacos too instead of needing to go to brown people country where 1/3 is controlled by drug cartels.

>>21474616
it's not about the conclusion being right or wrong. the argument itself is fallacious so "the argument" is invalidated. or else why form the argument in the first place

>>21474587
Imagine being as stupid as you lol
Fucking idiot
Touch grass
Touch first grade grammar

>>21473172 (OP)
>Korean flag
Literally stopped reading there, soulless plastic surgery zerg don't get to have opinions.

>>21474691
>cope fallacy aka appeal to butthurt