>>3995557
>I don't care if it sounds hypocritical, yes, I very much prefer to talk about how I'd spend the night making a shota cum than having to see some edge the edgelord showing his edge. I know that both are fantasy, and I fully understand that some people find the former abhorrent too. I don't care. This should be a thread to appreciate shos, not a thread to own some imbecile that should be ignored.
Thomas Mann, author of Death in Venice wrote a fictional account (or "fantasy") about a man who becomes entranced with the beauty of a young boy, so much so that it overwhelms him to the point of death. Mann was writing based on his own lived experience - with the boy Tadzio being based on a real boy that he had found himself feeling sexually attracted to. Likewise, it wasn't enough to write a novel about this attraction much in the same way several mangaka have been arrested for possession of CP. When writing about his own son Klaus (given the nickname Eissi in his diary), Mann wrote: "[I] find it quite natural that I should fall in love with my own son..." In another entry he notes his sexual interest even further when he writes in another entry: "[I] came upon Eissi totally nude and up to some nonsense by Golo’s bed... deeply struck by his radiant adolescent body; overwhelming." At some point you have to ask yourself when "fantasy" becomes borderline-reality. We already know and cannot downplay that drawn shota are representation of real boys. Anyone that denies this is just lying. To see violence and abuse being handwaved away, dismissed, and treated as nothing important because "it's just fantasy" shows a total lack of care for the matter at hand. That said, sexual violence, rape, and objectification through pornographic fantasies are just as abusive and violent and should be treated as such. This was supposed to be a SFW board. It seems everyday lately Rule 5 is intentionally being violated, as well as the main purpose of this board.
