>>149129074>>149128623 (OP)The "Girlboss" phenomenon exists in response to Hollywood wanting to capitalize on women being bigger consumers than men and take advantage of how men's girlfriends/wives/female family members will purchase men's IP. But because Hollywood execs are morons and the creatives are midwits with agendas, the "Girlboss" is created because the execs still want a "male" main character but one that's superficially female so it can tick off required boxes. The Girlboss isn't really a character so much as she is a plot device and mandate born out of women's insecurity, as well as a combination of misandry (the execs still don't like women despite what they claim) and misogyny (the creatives hate men), and a misunderstanding of why female action characters are popular to begin with
Women don't like Girlbosses because the Girlboss has no real character to project onto or parallel the female experience with. Female characters (as well as male characters that are popular with women because they act like women: Griffith, Elric, Starscream, Draco Malfoy, MCU Bucky and Loki, Sasuke) are beloved because they reflect who women and what they do and would like to see, what they would want to happen to them, etc. More women gave a shit about Darcy or MCU Peter than they ever did Carol.
Hollywood needs to realize that women like characters that are...well, women. Women like pretty jewelry and colorful outfits and shopping and talking about their day and gossiping and playing house/life sims/puzzle games and watching horror movies and lusting after men and being very emotionally vulnerable