These unironically all look like the same movie.
They all have "garbage energy"

>>149129444 (OP)
You are unironically blind.

>>149129444 (OP)

>>149129444 (OP)
Coco was actually good and looks good, you toppa tengen gurren nigga.
the other two, yes, I agree

>>149129444 (OP)
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!
THAT IS VERY FUNNY! NICE TRY

THEY ARE AMAZING MOVIES!

Ok, I'm ginna bring up trannime.
I was at a friend's house and they put spirited away, I had never seen it before.
I used to think Pixar didn't do anything for me anymore because I was too old for kid's movies and the megic was gone.
FUCK NO. I felt it watching this.
I felt like a kid again. I don't know what it is but it just have soul. The other option was "turning red" and that looks like fucking dumpster juice.
The cover alone, looks much better. It feels like they had a story to tell, not a gay message to tell, like pixar movies look like they have.
I don't know. I haven't seen any pixar movies lately

Coco isn't even beanmouth, it has Inside out style humans. Swap it out with Turning Red and you'd have a point.

You can clearely see the major sucking point starts with UP and don't stop

>>149130010
No, it was Cars 2.

A movie directed by…

John Lasseter.

The fucking god everyone says was the guy who was keeping Pixar afloat.

>>149129444 (OP)
You know damn well they don’t.

You’re just riding the unwarranted Pixar hate train