>>149236228>First, getting someone drunk to facilitate sex very much meets the legal definition of rape in most jurisdictions.You're wrong first off, any law that broaches the subject is very clear about the victim needing to be unable to consent and they need to prove malice even when it does reach that point, being drunk doesn't mean you're passed out and unable to consent and every sentencing has to weigh this with how drunk the jury is convinced they were, don't talk about the law if you're going to act like they're rules in a server with definitive answers.
Secondly, Paulo went on the date explicitly to have sex with Jess, they didn't drink to facilitate having sex they drank because they're partying in a club and that's how you loosen up, you're drawing intent toward their actions that A: are never backed up in the comic and B: pretend like Paulo was doing any of this against his will
Jess and Paulo are less than a year apart in age, they both drank, both of them were going into the date under zero false pretenses (Jess told Paulo she was only doing it to make Tess jealous, Paulo told her it would work and she should go on a date with him to spite Tess), and both of them consented to have sex in the end to the point Paulo immediately went out to fuck Rachel too.
If you really just want to say Jess was a creep fine, I disagree she was the only one to blame but whatever, but carrying any water for it being rape like you're flirting with even now is beyond ridiculous, it's borderline a farce that can only be explained by ulterior motives or immense stupidity.