>>149292615 (OP)
Because fundamentally human sexual and social dynamics are hardwired for women to form cliques around a single male, usually headed by one who was socially dominant in some way, so them bonding sexually and romantically to secure stability for their in group makes sense. This is why women are universally more attracted to "claimed" men, and even part of why they regularly outsource their opinions and choices to their ingroup for safety, they're naturally inclined to it. Women who exist outside this dynamic meanwhile adapt to hypergamy to sate the needs of less successful males and secure themselves and their future offspring by ingratiating themselves with them alongside other women and failed males who feminize to secure their own place. It's why lesbianism isn't even really much of an actual thing to begin with, since up until like the late 1800s-mid-1900s women engaging in physical intimacy with close female friends was literally just something they did as a bonding thing without a romantic component for most of human history in huge swathes of human cultures.
Multiple men maintaining their masculinity in a relationship however is universally a sign something's gone wrong and it's probably related to disease, genetic flaws, resource scarcity, personal inability, or physical or other forms of damage, etc, IE basically there's a number of reasons and none of them are positive.
Our ancestors didn't build harems with regular access to various forms of prostitutes on the side from basically fucking day 5 of developing complex societies because they were retarded, it was a natural evolution of human social and sexual dynamics.
Thus, Lesbians get a pass and are well liked because they still kind of work parallel to human nature while fags set off gigantic evolutionarily curated warning sirens.
