https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wGFwgb3KzF8

She sounds kinda clingy, dont you think?

Bitch having like 3 feathers on you doesnt make you a chicken

>>149300660

he has them on ears and arms, also has chicken legs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZIgUdME0qs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm7IZHa3tog
Is it me or are way more animated films/shows trying to recently intentionally go for a furry porn audience?

>>149300581 (OP)
I'm usually all about the bunnies but that thing is ugly

>>149300823
Gee I hope so

>>149300921
it's the chicken parts that are offputting, overall decent indiana spoof

>>149300581 (OP)
Unfucked it for you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGFwgb3KzF8

>>149300823
I will let you in on a little secret: furries have been part of the animation industry from day 1.

>>149300581 (OP)
Looks like shit

>>149301646
That's not how it works, dummy. To transform your words into fact, you must get dem digits. Dubs make you correct for a day. Trips make you correct for a week. Quads make you correct for a month. You got dem singles, so your post, along with yourself, can go fuck itself.

>>149301067
She's a carpet muncher, isnt she?

>>149301938
If you want her to be...

>>149301938
She has a specific taste.

crolog? corog?

>>149300823
Yes.

>>149300581 (OP)
Reminder that this is an extremely unfaithful adaptation of a hidden gem.

>>149302888
Does it really count if the furry porn audience is making the damn thing?

>>149302912
I know about the comic. Who gives a fuck if the movie is unfaithful? 2 versions of the story can exist in the same reality.

>>149300823
guy who only watches porn: getting a lot of porn vibes from this

>>149302912
Does the comic have a tomboyish skunk girl with weaponized braps? Doesn't look like it...

>>149300581 (OP)
is the second movie out on streaming yet?

>>149303156
My favourite pirates don't have it.

>>149303156
I don't think it's even in English yet

>>149301102
Im aware, but theres a difference between wanting to sneak something in or you being the only one into the character vs intentionally trying to get furry porn made so awareness of your cartoon goes further

>>149303789
And what if you are the ghost in the machine? What if you want porn made because that would please YOU, the original artist?

>>149300581 (OP)
I like those pig designs, fun stuff

>>149300823
Kill yourself

>>149300581 (OP)
>shorts
cringe

>>149306016
Just change the URL with yt.com then /watch?v= and the video ID

Like I did here >>149301067

>>149301067
>>149306068
I like your style, anon.

>>149302618
Croc.

>>149300581 (OP)
What sucks is that now that AI art is so prominent and so many companies are confirmed to have an interest in using it to speed up production by skipping that pesky "artists making concept art" phase, I'm going to be looking at any design that looks glossy and generic and melds different elements together in a weird way like "Chickenhare", and thinking "Did an AI design that?" Probably not, it's a sequel to a 2022 movie based on a book, and it was most likely made by some underpaid designer working for "nWave studios", but doing their best to make the design look as Disney as possible. But AI image generation now would likely produce a very similar image if you prompted it to make an image of the book character Chickenhare in the style of Zootopia and just went with what came out.

>>149301067
so they just straight up have a lesbian romance in this huh

nice

>>149303156
I don't think it will be out for a few more months.

>>149300823
I think it's more that furry stuff can get away with a lot more gags that people might find offensive if they were humans.
Level of separation.

>>149307942
That is not just an interesting thought. That is more than just your theory. That is the actual truth, and you figured it out.

>>149300581 (OP)
Guess I'm finally watching the first Chickenhare then. I remember /co/ shilling it a little while back

>>149309203
I hope you know where to find the best versions (like me).

>>149300581 (OP)
I one day hope to be interred in a tomb defended by the riddle of 'patting your head while rubbing your tummy.'

>>149300581 (OP)
Wow, I thought this was just some super obscure netflix animation. Saw the first one way back when just out of boredom. Didn't realize they kept making more?

>>149309746
I thought it will remain a very obscure comic + somewhat obscure ONE movie. This sequel thing came out of nowhere.

>>149309804
reusing assets saves time so it's easy money

>>149300581 (OP)
Is purple-blue the new blue-orange?

>>149310106
Yes. But it's only the poster.

Not enough skunk butt in this here thread

>>149311098

>>149311098

>>149312070
>>149313189
ffffuck

>>149313487
You should see it when it "activates"

>>149300921
>>149300935
Honestly I’ve seen smut of the bunny and he can work, it’s really just the feathers on the head and chicken legs that make it not a pure bunny
Can easily have his hat on and/or cover or not focus on legs if those are issues. Or just exclude them entirely like people usually do with Bugs’ whiskers

>>149313504
link the scenes
NOW

>>149313801
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3B5Di2g4Qh4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByCyc9EA4_8

>>149312070
>>149313189
>>149313875

Meg, BRRRAP queen of /co/

she reminds me of Marquez from Wild Assault.
(no, her toxin doesn't come from There)

>>149312070
I like this pose in particular. It's like she's saying
>Get ready! I've been building this one up for a LONG time!

>>149313965

which is most likely if it's her first BRRRAP in the movie.

>>149309746

studio made an easter egg in their previous movie showing sequel's poster, i love shit like this.

>>149313875
>>149313801
People like you is why most skunkfags are ashamed to admit their favourite animal. You should be gassed to death not in Minecraft.

>>149314110
serves them right for having a skunk as their favorite animal

>>149314110
Why not just embrace it? They're stinky little critters, that's part of their charm.

>>149314399
they're not even that stinky, save for the spray, it's not brrrap

>>149314414
>it's not brrrap
Toon logic. It stinks and comes from the rear, it's either a brap or something that can't be shown to an all-ages audience (except in South Korea, for some reason...)

>>149314450
I remember Family Guy showed it properly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhtJfgq3Gf0

>>149315025
Yeah, if you want to be "realistic," you'd show it realistically. But if you want to be silly and fun, then *BRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAP*

>>149310106
I've been seeing it more lately.