>>149323529>Then there is no such thing as an incel because cheap hookers exist.I think most incels would reject having to pay for sex as a valid option. Because as that point you are basically advocating for betabux/oofy-doofy shit.
Not that I endorse or accept incel beliefs, just sticking to the traditional definition.
>But all I'm telling you is that a person doesn't have to be unattractive to qualify.I think you kinda have to in order to qualify. Maybe not 2/10 monstrosities, but def no more than 6/10 at best.
Also , women could get laid by a guy on any level attractiveness.