>>149368377 (OP)Something I've noticed recently is a connection between Wonder Woman's character and her inability to grapple with the concept of man's world.
However, when comparing her relationship with characters such as Superman, Batman, and the Kyle Rayner Green Lantern, I feel like that concept of justice she attributes herself to, by allowing herself to kill with no cost or mercy as opposed to Batman and Superman'a "no-kill rule" can largely be seen as a far cry to a political struggle regarding her inward insight of trying to fit into modern civilization; inasmuch as the fact that she was created by an American author, as opposed to Batman and Superman whose creators were Jewish respectively. So they're largely going to push forward this narrative that you mustn't kill supervillains and criminals, in spite of what history and the code of hammurabi told us ages ago.
This is also a rather poor conjecture but compare superhero comics to Japanese Manga. In those series, a lot of characters will kill and won't hesitate to kill; with some stories even permitting or allowing it. Even superhero Manga take into account of this because these series are politically inundated with the influence of Japan. Not as much so when compared to the states.
If we want to go further, we can also argue a key scene in the power rangers or sentai series which, coincidentally, was produced by Saban, an Israeli owned conglomerate in the states, along with X-men Tas. One scene that stands out is when a kid is trying to take revenge on the monster that killed their family. The Japanese just says fuck it we ball. But the US version goes out of their way to say no he deserves to live.
Having superheroes say "we are not the law" is bullshit because that's a tepid excuse. Do you know of or see any superpoweted law enforcement that I don't know of? Exactly. So why have superheroes act like we need to care? What's the point? What are they trying to prove in order to make an example out of us?