Thread 149381276

Same as

>Man of Steel
>Aquaman
>The Batman
>Spider-Man
>Spider-Man 2
>The Amazing Spider-Man
>X-Men
>X-Men: The Last Stand
>X-Men: Apocalypse
>The Wolverine
>Logan
>Captain America: The First Avenger
>The Incredible Hulk
>Thor: The Dark World
>Ant-Man and the Wasp
>Black Widow

>>149381276 (OP)
>Spider-Man
>Spider-Man 2

Should at least be an A.

>>149381276 (OP)
This makes me thing Cinemascore is kinda retarded and not a good way to judge movies

>>149381276 (OP)
Sounds like a movie’s “Cinemascore” isn’t a very reliable marker of quality then, because those movies all widely vary in quality, and most of them do not meet the common conception of an ‘A-’. I’m sorry, in no universe is X-Men the Last Stand comparable in quality to Spider-Man 2

>>149382473
Why?

>>149382490
>in no universe is X-Men the Last Stand comparable in quality to Spider-Man 2

TLS is underrated and SM2 is overrated.

>>149382473
>>149382490
The cope begins.

>>149382513
Or you just have bad taste. That’s usually what it means when someone says something is “underrated” or “overrated”. They’re looking for a framework where their tastes are the objective marker of quality and everyone else is wrong, but really they just like bad things more than good things.

>>149381276 (OP)
>Spider-Man
>Spider-Man 2
It is an insult that these two films are considered at the same level as the others listed.

>>149382537
>They’re looking for a framework where their tastes are the objective marker of quality
>they just like bad things more than good things

Irony as it is cast.

>>149383466
Except that a movie’s actual reception works much better as objective marker than one person’s opinions. There isn’t really an irony there.

>>149381276 (OP)
That is a ridiculously random list, to the point I can't trust anything these clowns say.