>>149388685But the problem with comics is not just that their true full story is prohibitively long and compiled in a jumbled mess of varying titles and crossovers, but that it doesn't have a grasp of its own canon. And there is a canon.
The problem with the image in
>>149387215 (OP) is that it's simply not true.
To read and understand the full picture of One Piece or the other examples, you don't have to read those spin-off chapters, they're not canon and frankly nobody cares about them. There's no discussion about them, nobody collects them. They're just spin-off, many of them aren't even made by the author, they're effectively just merchandise.
To get the full picture of One Piece, you start with chapter 1 and read it one chapter at a time without deviation until you reach the end.
but comics don't have that. There is no hard line between what is canon and what is not. The "canon" is a loose regulation changed continously by the creators.
Something may be canon one day and then disowned the next, and then reinstated the next. It means nothing.
Batman has 20 different origin stories, none of which is the one true origin.
Superman has died... or has he?
Spiderman is married, but also he's not, but also he's dead, but also he's not.
There's no coherence. Either you read ALL of Batman and are presented with a nonsensical mirage of a story, more like a collection of myths than anything else.
Or you pick a slither of a timeline and personally consider that narrow band to be the story of Batman, ie Batman Year One, but now you don't have the full story, and to have even chosen that slither to begin with you must have weighed it up against the other options for what story to follow, something a beginner is incapable of doing because they are not aware of the options to begin with.