>>149409826
I pray we get Nightwing and Tim Drake. Gunn should drop the puppet movie and Brave and the Bold entirely. They are fucking retarded quarter billion risks
>>149409558 (OP) >>149409858
OP it’s a stretch, and not a confirmation. It’s a city name drop, floods are a thing, and even if they’re referring a severe significant instance it’d be a no man’s land reference. Gunn is introducing a new Batman
>>149409937
Gunn confirmed that isn't the design he wants to use topkek >"Whenthey first gave [the episode] to me, we saw a lot more Batman. And I was saying, 'I am not ready to commit to that, I'm not ready to commit to that, I'm not ready to commit to that.' So I just went like, 'More silhouette, more silhouette, more silhouette.' Ithink it's a great way to show that Batman does exist, he already exists in this universe." https://www.slashfilm.com/1750829/james-gunn-dcu-batman-creature-commandos-reveal/
>>149409875
We already had BvS, can DC please stop trying to bring all their A-listers together? Let Superman save Metropolis, Batman save Gotham, WW save Themyscira, etc.
>>149409955 >>149409967
This is severe fucking cope holy shit. How are you going to act when they naturally cast a new Batman? The Batman is allowed to be self contained while they have a DCU Batman too
>>149409967 >floods are a thing
Yes, they are, especially in cities that lie by the sea, like Gotham. The idea of Gotham flooding is not an invention of Reeves; it has been featured in comics, animation, and video games before.
Why do you guys want a movie that was so committed to being "grounded" that it changed the penguins name from Oswald to Oz in order to be more realistic to be part of a movie universe that's obviously inspired by four color comic books and wacky shit?
>>149411858
That seems like a really stupid reason to mix two universes together instead of letting Reeves do his own grounded take on batman while Gunn works on a more four color comic oriented batman. Like two can exist
>>149411848 >"grounded" that it changed the penguins name from Oswald to Oz in order to be more realistic to be part of a movie universe
You fucking idiot. Matt Reeves change penguin name to sound more Italian. The Italian mafia would give someone shit for having a British sounding last name like Cobblepot. Hell Oz not even the penguin real name in universe.
>>149411848
I don't. I'm right there with you. Robert Pattinson Batman does not belong in the Gunnpoint Universe. His movie is about hunting down a serial killer, what kind of stakes are there if he can just ask Hawkgirl to swing by and do a fly over or have a Green Lantern use their cosmic ring AI to figure out puzzles for him? Matt Reeves The Batman should be its own Black Label world and they can get an elder statesman type for the mainstream films. Maybe give us a World's Finest team-up movie instead of making them fight right out of the gate. Although the John Byrne first meeting is pretty much what I'd want in the movie.
Having two theatrical Batmans running parallel is fucking stupid. The only reason The Batman isn't in the DCU is because they wanted to be safe in case Superman flopped
>people are ok with ruining one universe if that means "helping" a new one
we could have 2 batmans , one grounded and one more akin to the comics
Why the FUCK are people against this? Specially with the fact there are people who like the grounded approach with comic stuff
>>149411848 >Why do you guys want a movie that was so committed to being "grounded" that it changed the penguins name from Oswald to Oz >DCU Superman opens with him getting his ass kicked by a D-list supervillain >Robert Pattinson Batman is the only live action Batman that uses nanotechnology such as contact lenses that record and stream 4K footage as well record audio >Matt Reeves Batman armor so advanced he intentionally get shot up with 556 in point blank something DCEU Batman avoids
>in order to be more realistic to be part of a movie universe that's obviously inspired by four color comic books and wacky shit? >The penguin outright sets up the court of owls.
The whole argument the Batman is too grounded for the DCU retarded.
>>149412038
I’m fully convinced most /tv/ are pajeets. They went from spamming Superman threads to damage controlling all the overt Gaza shit in the movie.
>>149412107
The fact that your feeble fucking brain can't handle the idea of two batman movies existing at the same time is enough to tell me your a brain dead sjw
I don't understand why they can't just have Pattinson show up in the crossovers, but keep his solo films their own thing. Like keep it vague how canon his solo films are to the wider universe, and don't reference the whacky crossover shit in his solo outings. Isn't that how the comics basically worked anyway, before everything became a massive crossover event?
>>149409558 (OP)
But how would that work? The Batman Part II and The Brave and the Bold are both already confirmed, and the latter’s gonna feature Damian Wayne’s Robin
>>149409558 (OP)
You can argue tone. But saying the Batman too realistic to be in the DCU dumb. Nano machines aside. Robert Pattinson Batman uses prototype venom in the end of the movie.
>>149412046 >they wanted to be safe in case Superman flopped
Well, it did. It's looking at a sub 500 million box office. Supergirl and Clayface will obviously not gross more than that.
>>149412046
Well I think the actual reason is that James Gunn just doesnt know what to make of The Batman Part 2 yet. He knows that its a popular property but Matt Reeves needs to sort of give James Gunn an in to either have a proper tie in or at least a nod to make it seem plausible that both properties can coexist. If whatever Matt Reeves writes doesnt allow this Superman to exist then even if James Gunn's movie made a kryptillion dollars Gunn would just have to bite the bullet and make his own Batman(also theoretically he CAN just have the next Batman end in part 2 and bring in Robert Pattinson without ever making a direct movie sequel, worked out for Hulk up until Endgame)