>>149441131 (OP)Neither.
It's literally meant to be a funny grossout story - it's childish shit, it's meant to make kids laugh. There's no grooming shit. Sometimes the easiest explanation is the right one. I mean you have to explain how kids are going to be groomed, and not only that he's failed to say what they're grooming them into? A fixation for porn so they can selll more later on? A fixation on cock and balls to turn them gay? Zoo shit? What's the aim here?
The real problem with the film is a bit more down to Earth - it's pandering to the lowest common denominator and it's telling small kids that there are no such things as boundaries, which is just not good generally.
It's not the same as letting your kid watch a movie aimed at teens, where there IS a boundary and you're teaching them to cross it and be naughty. After all, sometimes boundaries are meant to be broken if you have a reason and it's underparental supervision.
This is just saying, no boundaries exist. I should be a T, this movie.
But it's not some big grooming pedo porno conspiracy shit.