>>149500343>Superman has some legitimate arguments to make against itAs long as jails in his universe are completely non-functional, no he doesn't.
If he were proposing alternatives, then sure, let him cook, but ironically, usually if Superman proposes an alternative, it's some fate worse than death, which negates any moral high ground he could try to claim.
His best position is usually going to be something along the lines of "Would you want some sort of all powerful god running around punishing the wicked with no oversight." but that has several problems.
>1. It clashes with much better Superman writing where he sees himself as a farm boy, not a god.>2. I'm sure most people in universe would rather the famously a moral paragon Superman run around smiting villains than dipshits like the Joker murder hundreds of people every weekend.>3. He's already running around with no meaningful oversight doing his vigilante bullshit. Realistically nobody could stop him either way.The incessant need writers feel to recycle villains makes their heroes look like ineffective lunatics that don't care how many people die. Writers either need to have villains stay captured, be killed, or have superheroes at least consistently try to contain them. Superheroes would get a lot less shit if they were running their own prisons, they don't get in the way of other people killing villains, and their reason for killing is just "I don't want to". It'd still suck to see them ineffective, but at least they could argue they're making a good faith attempt.
Nothing about current superhero writing has them acting in good faith to save lives.