This emo girl is clearly inserted there for Grant Morrison's simping purposes since he wouldnt insert a MALE in makeup and expressive clothing purelt for his own dressplay and attention seeking, cause that male would be "egocentric" and "immature"
Since even liberal Superman still push for traditional dresscodes and functionalism for men, the new so called "kind" Superman becomes a symbol for simping rather than "hope" or whatever
Male feminists does this all the time, ovvercompensate with female charcters and gives them the extra self expression through hair and makeup which men in general cant cause of social norms, its simping rather than being "genderneutral"
Men in subcultural or individualistic clothing that sticks out never show up in a liberal comic
This is why I dont buy into the hypocritical liberal moral values of modern Superman

note. superman supports his bisexual son who is still clearly masculine and performs penetrative sex. however his gay pink haired boyfriend who doesnt conform to typical male standards is increasingly shown in a negative light

>a thread died for this

>>149502021 (OP)
that could be a boy

>>149502021 (OP)
>modern liberal Superman
May I see conservative Superman, outside of literal war propaganda?

>>149502054
No shit, the liberal moral values dictates that experimenting with gay sex is cool while selfie posting and every day dressplay for men isnt
Thats why its so fucking pathetic with the men with buzzcut, khaki pants and checkered button down shirts who brag about their bisexuality and how it makes them an extrovert not held back by the genderroles

>>149502069
Grant morrison made it a girl though, why is that? Its not like a style like that is the norm on women
Its male feminist overcompensation and simping

I'm starting to think right wingers are retarded and evil at their very core.

Anyone else?

>>149502075
Pre 90s
Are you that retarded that you beleibe Joe Shuser and Jerry Seigel were pro-trans?
John Byrne is banned from the mainstream comics industry for being a "transphobe"
Lib Superman is fairly recent and the fanbase are normie dudebros in plain baggy clothing who only socialize with other men if they also are dudebros in plain baggy clothing and they then feel good about themselves if they make an exception with their dudebro attitude and demand that a male dont attentionwhore through clothing and makeup for men who has mutilated themselves and dubbed themselves "trans"
Lib Superman fans would be the first to complain if Superman started to wear makeup as a simple style never mentioned in plot while they also claim its "sexist" to not approve if a female superhero experiment with butch style

>>149502110
The only thing separating you from right wingers when it comes to the genderole and dresscode for men is that you make an exception with men who has mutilated themselves, this shows in your lib comcis which cram in trans characters when male characters always wears plain baggy clothing and keep their hair short
Yes, theres the superhero suits, but its a uniform for a specific task and the male heroes dont combine it with makeup and when out of superhero uniform they wear plain baggy clothing and no male character really sticks out stylistically when out of superhero uniform
If the roles were reversed, libs would claim its ufair that women cant expresse style through the face or being allowed to show as much skin
Heres a piece of cloth on a male that requires mutilation to get your dudebro liberal approval

>>149502131
I’m sorry Anon, I wasn’t really clear, I meant conservative relative to the time the comic was published, rather than appearing conservative when looked back on by today’s standards. But by all means if you have any comics of Superman hating trannies from any time period please post those, it would be interesting to see.

>simps for mentally ill losers
>be surprised when his movie bombs outside of Shartmerica
Take the hint

>>149502171
So when you as we speak are against men in makeup and tight alternative fashion at the workplace or in your lib comic, then it means you are not liberal in the future? Then why the fuck dont you learn anything from past missatkes then?
This is you:
>ITS BIGOTRY TO NOT APPROVE TRANSWOMEN IN MAKEUP AND TIGHT AND EXPRESSIVE CLOTHING BUT CISMEN IN MAKEUP AND EXPRESSIVE CLOTHING HAS TO WAIT UNTIL IT BECOMES THE TREND TO CLAIM ITS BIGOTTED TO BE AGAINST THEIR WAY OF DRESS!
At the end of the day, you are stiff dudebro in baggy jeans and t-shirts whio has the idea you have to mutilate yourself to even allow yourself to comb your hair or hit the gym
You are not the openminded individual living an extrovert and exotic lifestyle as you pretend to be

>>149502198
I never thought I would see myself siding and having calm disscusions with feminists (trans exclusionary), what times we live in

>Grant Morrison fans be like

>>149502171
>IF I LIVE AN EVEN MOR EINTRIVERT LIFESTYLE THAN CONSERVATIVES JUST AS LONG AS I HYPE UP EXTROVERT WOMEN AND TRANSWOMEN, IM FREESPIRITEDD AS FUCK!

>>149502198
>>149502215
Threadly reminder that all right wingers are pedophiles

Any accusation from the right is actually an admission of guilt

>>149502244
>prove any of those files existed

>>149502108
>Its not like a style like that is the norm on women

It was an emo girls, in the mid-2000s (when All Star Superman was released). It's basic design language to help establish her as suicidal, as that was the emo stereotype.
A brain-dead mongoloid koala would be able to understand that.

Also
>he wouldnt insert a MALE in makeup and expressive clothing
>Men in subcultural or individualistic clothing that sticks out never show up in a liberal comic

What, you mean like Leo Quintum and his magic multicoloured coat? Or Jimmy Olsen and his wardrobe?
Fuck off you retarded faggot.

>>149502131
>Are you that retarded that you beleibe Joe Shuser and Jerry Seigel were pro-trans?
I honestly dont think theyd have an opinion one way or the other on the matter, considering being trans wasn't even a thing back in those days. Also, they're dead.

>>149502238
>>149502205
>no proof
ok
>>149502198
The movie doesn't even feature trannies yet here we are, talking as if there were trannies there.

>>149502244
Being a pedo is based now doe.

>>149503107
>Implying Joe and Jerry wouldn't call them Feygeles

>>149503260
>I can speak for the personal views of two guys ive never met and will never meet, who grew up in a vastly different world than I did because.........BECAUSE I CAN, OKAY?!

>>149502131
Considering they were Jews living in 1920s-30s New York, I'd wager they'd at least have some sympathy for trans people today

>>149502244
Where do you think you are

>>149502021 (OP)
Superman definitely molested that girl btw

>>149502021 (OP)
Didn't know Superman was political?

>>149502057
Yeah, there so many thread, yo.

>>149502021 (OP)
I understand a lot of people like this page for the characterization, but I can’t help but ask myself
>Isnt there someone else who could use his help more? Surely there’s a village in Africa being devastated by warlords or a family stranded after an earthquake

>>149502244
Bootlicking for Dear Leader is based

>so mindbroken by online culture war(funded by right wing think tanks) to the point you think saving a teenage girl is leftoid libtard shit
it really is so over

>>149502110
Nope. I never started, I always knew.
It was shit when they were Bush neocons, shit when they were Reaganites, and even more shit when they're MAGA. Just pure evil and sadism mixed with a victim complex and lots of projection. Tons of schizophrenia too, you could be talking about kids being bombed and they'll just respond "but trannies >:(", literal bots in human clothing.

>>149502244
>>149506971
Don't forget the Trump admin just blocked a law that would require priests to report confessions of child diddling too
HELL YEAH AMERICA

>>149502198
>>simps for mentally ill losers
I didn't know being bombed and forced into manmade famine by a genocidal state was a mental illness, nor is saving kids from it is "simping". Or are you so schizo that you immediately thought of trannies in a movie with no mention of them
>>be surprised when his movie bombs outside of Shartmerica
Superman is seen as a symbol of America, nothing more or less. Captain America's first movie had to be changed in other countries too.