>>149733097
To add to this, from a legal standpoint, art and literature about themes that are disturbing, unorthadox, explicitly sexual, or taboo are generally not restricted and it's specified on Archive of our Own.
From my understanding the only legal restrictions are:
- Explicitly sexual and photorealistic images of real-life human children.
- Visual art that traces or is reposted, falsely claiming credit.
- Literature that plagarizes a large amount of text word-for-word or makes commercial profit off of non-original intellectual property.
- Literature or art that makes and encourages non-satirical, non-comedic, non-literary, serious actionable and premeditated harassment threats towards specific organizations and groups.
- Comes under obscenity laws with the Miller Test, in which a sexual artwork that's profoundly taboo also lacks literary or artistic intent.
I know that anything not coming under these can be distributed and come across as subjectively creepy, they're best ignored.