Financially, nothing at all
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 8:04:22 PM
No.149750476
>>149750357 (OP)
Nothing. You're just retarded.
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 8:21:54 PM
No.149750687
>>149750357 (OP)
Your parents didn't pull out
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 8:35:49 PM
No.149750855
>>149750451
Artistically speaking? Everything.
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 11:01:32 PM
No.149753340
>>149750451
Financial success is not everything when you talk about movies quality.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 1:15:57 AM
No.149755303
>top: PDI logo used in the making of Antz and Shrek 1
>bottom: PDI logo used in the making of Shrek 2
That's a downgrade.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 3:14:15 AM
No.149757198
Shrek 2 is worse than its PDI predecessors. It's also worse than the other PDI movie that was being made almost at the same time.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 3:16:11 AM
No.149757221
>>149750451
I find it terribly amusing that Sharktalefag constantly makes threads about movies from this era failing and comparing box office numbers, but specifically avoids doing this with Shrek 2. You can tell just how badly it bites his autism.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 3:19:32 AM
No.149757263
two Renaissance Wraps, no mayo, and chili rings, one medieval meal, Harold, curly fries, sourdough soft taco?
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 4:11:57 AM
No.149757962
>Toy Story
>Antz
>A Bug's Life
>Toy Story 2
>Shrek
>Monsters, Inc.
>Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius
>Ice Age
>Finding Nemo
It doesn't have the charm from the Pixar/PDI/Blue Sky/Nickelodeon movies that came out before
