>>149831731
No, you cant. Im not american. I have subsardized MRI. But only some clinics are approved to give cheap MRIs and even then only when you have a referral from a GP for something that NEEDS MRI. No matter how accuurate it is you cant and dont get an MRI to just confirm random bullshit without a trial of care. But you're just lying for the sake of contradicting me at this point
>>149831756
There are 18 citations of papers establishing a difference AND theres the criteria used in the paper itself. If you really want to know what they did then just read the paper...
>>149833367
1) incidental findings on imaging are extremely common, nothing in the paper suggests MRI as a gold standard
2) even if it was, if the diagnosis can be made without it theres no reason to send for MRI
3) If you wanted to embezzel/waste money you WOULD just send for a shitload of MRIs because they're expensive and estrogen costs like $100 dollars a year
4) even if MRI were used to diagnose trans people that would make no difference in treatment
5) other treatment modalities have been tried for like 50 years and none of them worked
At this point you're just appealing to the evil nature of big pharma, but the expensive part of transitioning is the surgeries and even then, mostly just FFS which you dont need if you get estrogen early enough, and SRS which most people dont get, and most people go overseas for those anyway. So who actually benefits from the conspiracy? The elite global kabal of... korean and thai plastic surgeons?
