>>149865275 >She hasn't been relevant in decades.
She was never ever relevant, not even when the show was new.
But it's comfy and wholesome, and Mimi is charmful.
>>149866835
But why would they spam Mimi specifically? Why not Polly Pocket with its many underage characters, why not Jade Armor or Harriet the spy which are almost new enough to still be relevant?