>>150027711
>Those genres are in bigger numbers
yes
> and way more varied than cartoons
no
in animes you have: 'guy does magic shit and fight enemies with it' and it's 'battle shonen'. there is no distinction in genre to be made just because the magic shit is called "quirk" and not "stand/jutsu/bankai/devil fruit/stand".
meanwhile most cartoons can't even be defined by a single genre.
what is Courage? a horror-comedy-adventure-slapstick? what is Dexter? a slice of life-sci-fi-fantasy-action-comedy? what is Son of the White Mare? a psychedelic-folk tale-fantasy-psychological-action-adventure? what is The Mysteries of Providence? a dark-mystery-adventure-comedy-fantasy? what is Pelikan Blue? a reverse-detective-documentary-thriller-roadmovie?
even regarding Dalmatian Street, it has sitcom elements, slapstick elements, and horror elements. if that and Loud House were made in Japan, they would rehash them so many times that it would create a new genre called "big-family anime", just like they rehashed King Kong so many times it became the "kaiju" genre and rehashed big robots so much it became the "mecha" genre. that is the difference. if westerners made a movie about someone shitting their pants and it got rehashed in japan so much it became "poopu maiu pantsu" genre, you would unironically claim japan has more diverse genres.
>>150027754
using no examples to support your claims makes you look even more foolish.
>>150027901
cool, because all of my examples contradict everything you claimed too.
>but in a genre like sci-fi there a way too few of them
and this is why it's not worth arguing with bad faith weebs. fucking seriously? off the top of my head: star wars cartoons, star trek cartoons, fantastic planet, gandahar, time masters, mΓ©zga family, mikrobi, once upon a time... space, cat city, white plastic sky.
go actually watch cartoons before claiming something.