← Home ← Back to /co/

Thread 150032973

28 posts 16 images /co/
Anonymous No.150032973 >>150033041 >>150033087 >>150033249 >>150034444 >>150035046 >>150035233 >>150035767 >>150035882 >>150036263
Why do people only complain when Japanese cartoons sexualize children and teenagers but not when our cartoons do the same shit?
Anonymous No.150033041
>>150032973 (OP)
I promise you that the people that are complaining about anime, are complaining about everything in life, foreign or domestic. If it exists, they are incensed about your ability to access it.
Anonymous No.150033087 >>150034340
>>150032973 (OP)
1. they do
2. western cartoons try to skirt the line by focusing on the joke rather than arousal
Anonymous No.150033178 >>150034370 >>150034428 >>150034897 >>150035325
Call me when a western cartoon does this. It's night and day. But the real reason is in the west, it is usually the joke and absurdity of it. The scene of Stewie doing that isn't meant to be erotic. It's meant to be absurd and 'haha eww' rather than 'haha I'm CUMMMING'.
Anonymous No.150033249
>>150032973 (OP)
Everyone on /co/ are 30 year olds checking out cartoon girls cheesecake threads anon
Anonymous No.150034340
>>150033087
>they do
In a highly co trolled context so it's just enough to check the box but no one ever loses their job or gets a show canceled. Stewie literally is a baby who gets groomed and raped by adult men canonically, as a joke, in almost every episode.
I wanna draw Louise Belcher with H cup tits and I get called a pedophile and banned.
Anonymous No.150034370
>>150033178
Oh ok so if I put "all of this is a joke" in my bio I'm bullet proof? No? Only if AOL Time Warner or Turner Broadcasting sign my checks? Ok.
Anonymous No.150034428 >>150034468
>>150033178
>I posted porn and thought I made a point
Anonymous No.150034444
>>150032973 (OP)
>no you don't understand, that scene was AGAINST twerking, that's why it had to be as well animated as possible
Reminds me of a "Me! Me! Me!"
Anonymous No.150034468
>>150034428
Illya wishes she got any action in that.
Anonymous No.150034897 >>150035060 >>150035089 >>150035325
They only target the things they don't like or have no stake in. The people who complained about video game violence in the 90's would have done mental gymnastics and double standards if you tried to convince them they should censor things like TV, movies, books, etc... as well.

>>150033178
OP image has a 10 year old boy putting his penis in another 10 year old boys mouth. Your argument is invalid.
Anonymous No.150035046
>>150032973 (OP)
Cartman sucks was a really good episode thoughbeit
Anonymous No.150035060 >>150035089 >>150035866
>>150034897
There were so many highly sexual situations with butters in a very short period that I'm convinced butters is Matt and treys shota insert
Anonymous No.150035089
>>150034897
>>150035060
you could put several south park episodes in the OP
Anonymous No.150035233
>>150032973 (OP)
>but not when our cartoons do the same shit?
Twitter at least pays you for these for these rage bait threads.
Anonymous No.150035325 >>150035537 >>150035701
>>150034897
The intent makes all the difference. Yes, South Park has done raunchier things with child characters, and I have no doubt that people have beaten off to them, but it's meant to be shocking or funny or social commentary. >>150033178 was very clearly intended to be a scene watch with one hand on rewind, the other preoccupied.
It's like saying Looney Tunes is raunchier than furry softcore because the animals are naked.
Anonymous No.150035537 >>150035677
>>150035325
Shut the fuck up. We don't care about your mental gymnastics.
Anonymous No.150035654 >>150035701
It's always cartoonfags who have the most ridiculously deviant senses of what's sexy, if you pop a boner to the South Part art style then you need to be dunked in a vat of acid
Anonymous No.150035677
>>150035537
Man, if this show looked any higher quality, more people would treat it like Big Mouth
Anonymous No.150035701
>>150035325
>>150035654
You lost. Go.
Anonymous No.150035767 >>150035866 >>150036188
>>150032973 (OP)
Because one is meant to appeal to arouse pedos and the other is meant to be funny
Anonymous No.150035866
>>150035767
You think raping children is funny? >>150035060
They allowed the Craig and Tweak stuff but if a different show did official Craig and Tweak stuff I'm sure many fags would cry about it.
Anonymous No.150035882
>>150032973 (OP)
i forgot right really shook some ass
Anonymous No.150035960
The yaoi episode proves that Matt and Trey know their audience is full of women who jerk off to 9 year old boys sucking each other off
Anonymous No.150035981
People do complain about it and that's why cartoons do it because they know it's shock humor
Anonymous No.150036188
>>150035767
Stfu trannyfaggot
Anonymous No.150036263
>>150032973 (OP)
Double standards. People don't want to admit the things they like do the same things they hate or virtue signal about. This even happens in the anime community. Dragon Ball fans complain a lot about a random moe series having sexual scenes and creepy fans while forgetting everything involving Bulma or Goku's cock being out all the time in original Dragon Ball.
Anonymous No.150036277
>Why
It's a power move to silence competition, rather than letting audience decide what they want.
Most complaints can be ignored, but "news" about the complaints are drummed up for clicks and to drown out any real audience response. And that' not getting into critics.