Thread 150081638

Why are they all mermaids? Only Ariel's a mermaid. How does this make any sense?

>>150081655
coomers have brain damage. it's a known fact

Is Jessica Rabbit a princess? and why do they have the same off model look?

>>150081719
Meg's not a Princess either. OP's just throwing Disney gals around calling them princesses for no reason! It's confusing the shit out of me!!!

>>150081655
Because I found this new image of mostly Disney Princesses so we're using it.

boobers

>>150081638 (OP)
>Opening bids, gentlemen?

>>150081638 (OP)
>all these yapping foids and libs and libfoids
American girls should go through brainwashing to factory reset if they're bad eggs and made into Disney Princesses to sell to Men. Girls who don't think deeply and just want to have a home to clean and a Man in charge. Unable to status judge just built to love their owners and smooch them every day, wearing ribbons and high heels and nothing else. Pop out of the box, fall in love at first sight with their Man, and get to making homes and babies forever.

>>150081935
First off we got Princess Jasmine the Middle East of China probably before the time of Islam so fun dancing she comes with domesticated grown tiger .

>>150081638 (OP)
I dint have a 9,000 gallon saltwater tank

>>150082287
Oh don't worry they turn into humans when they get dry enough they turn back into mermaids when they get wet enough and changing between mermaid and human doesn't affect pregnancy on the baby either way they have them in their belly and don't lay eggs.

>>150081719
none of them are off model

>>150082121
This auction is clearly happening in 17th century Constantinople, it's the only way to get so much variety.

Very nice, how much?

>>150083098
Which one do you want? They are sold individually besides the queen and her princess sister because I can't separate the two they're too good together.

>>150083128
Ariel

>>150081638 (OP)
I know you guys have an Alice in the back somewhere

>>150081638 (OP)
>>150083337
I'm gonna need an aged up Vanellope von Schweetz

>>150081763
But it makes no sense. Just because it's new? That's not good enough, if you're going to give us choices, give us choices indicative of their actual nature's and builds, don't confuse people with non canon nonsense

>>150083529
Do you have a image of a bunch of Disney princess girls?

>>150081638 (OP)
No Cinderella, no interest. Give me Cindy.

>>150081638 (OP)
This is only half of them

Honestly one thing I wish /co/ could have is a bit of a drawthread for Disney Princess lewds.

Say what you will about how gynocentric Disney is, at least ONE good consequence of that is that they've given us a really nice stable of high-quality girls. They don't have enough lewds, IMO. Not well-drawn ones anyway.

Bump

>>150082026
You're describing sexbots, which are only a couple years from the mass market.

>>150085232
>sexbots, which are only a couple years from the mass market.
WHAT?

>>150085481
>hehe, sexbot, act like my crying little girl daughterwife
>*sorry, but my job as a sexbot is to create a ethical and saf-*
>Nooooooooo!!!

>>150082026
WHAT?

>>150081638 (OP)
>>150081763
So OP do they magically transformed back to humans right and I’m assuming past 18. Also tell you what you throw in two for the price of one I’ll go with Meg and Elsa.
Alright anons you can choose from the rest now.

>>150086074
See >>150082357

>>150081638 (OP)
Sir, these are clearly bootlegs, do you even have a permit?

>>150086678
This is a slave auction and I'm selling people actual people you don't bootlegs people.

>>150081638 (OP)
Would large protruding breasts be useful underwater?

>>150082026
yyea that would be neat. Unfortunately women want to be men in terms of political and business power while retaining the advantages of being women and its destroying society so you just have to cope about it. What youre proposing would limit their ability to be financially independent voters so it cant exist and you are a wrongthinker and villain.

>>150081655
mermaids good

>>150081655
Magic, the same that made Ariel human.

>>150085232
>which are only a couple years from the mass market.
lol
lmao, even

>>150081655
you wouldn't get it