Thread 150084963

Despite its many flaws, the movie actually had some decent costumes.

>>150084963 (OP)
why does sony consistently make terrible fucking movies, they could have had an actual good universe by now if they weren't such retards

>>150084963 (OP)
Is it true they only wore the costumes for a few minutes in the actual movie?

>>150085547
There are brief of them throughout and I'd be surprised if it's more than a minute all combined. You never get a good look.

damn, the costumes actually look decent for most of them

>>150084969
>>150085185
>>150085204
>>150085219
>Main character gets the worst suit

What did Sony mean by this?

>>150084963 (OP)
this was absolutely going to be the world's first $100m porno and they chickened out

>>150085547
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftb987bYg3o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5mM91XfcJ8

These are all their scenes wearing the suits in the whole movie.

How does Madame Web compare to Catwoman? Better, worse, about the same?

>>150085838
Madam Web doesn't have a suit more like a dress. It was a shit take on the red dress and red sun glasses but yeah it should have been a white spider on the chest and honestly they should have just given her Jessica Drews suit for the movie

>>150086141
Worse, Catwoman is funny bad, Madame Web is more boring bad most of the time.

>>150084963 (OP)
>>150084969
I've seen better in AXEL BRAUN MOVIES.

>>150086529
>comic accurate sharon, red skull and falcon
yep, better indeed. all of my comic fantasies have come alive in braun's work

Why no lenses?

>>150084963 (OP)
>decent costumes
They sorta look like their from the CW

>see this
>oh this movie might be okay, they look hot
>they are only in the suits in the movie for two future flashes

>>150085041
>>150085171
Web commando spidey in live action

Instead of making a bad movie, why didn't they make it a good movie instead?

>>150086892
they're

Madame Web is the normie Marvel version of Ken Penders Lara-Su chronicles

>>150086950
Making good movies is hard.

>>150086892
yeah

>>150086912
Mattie was the hot one

>>150086983
No it's not. There's plenty of good movies to prove my point

>>150086997
But how many movies made are good out of total movies?

>>150086180
Actually, why didn't they just make a Spider-Woman movie with Jessica Drew to begin with? She has the most material to work with and even if you drop it to the minimum a woman without memories of her past involved in spy conspiracy things that have an occult leaning sounds like it would do well.

>>150087095
Jessica is in a mess of movie rights, both Marvel and Sony haver her. as stated in the leaked e-mails:
>'Jessica Drew' and specifically listed related characters. [Sony Pictures] may depict Jessica Drew as Spider-Woman, and Marvel may only use her without any Spider-Man-related elements.
Might explain why her ATSV version was so different than usual.

>>150087013
I counted all the movies, there's more good movies than bad ones. Sorry pal.

People complain about origin stories but this was the origin story to the origin story.
>Normal movie: they get powers in first act, stuff happens, they defeat bad guy.
>This movie: they never get powers but at some point in the future they will get powers and kill a dude so he is gonna kill them first.
So we have a superhero movie where none of them can fucking do anything. And apparently the alternate scripts had stuff like them protecting baby Peter Parker.

>>150084963 (OP)
>Sweeney is only 27 yet has all those eye wrinkles

How much drugs does she do?? She's gonna be the fucking crypt keeper by the time she's 35 if she keeps it up.

>>150087185
I'm surprised Julia qualifies if that is the case instead of being split rights. Or maybe she also is, and just they didn't see an issue with using her. Film rights are complicated.

>>150087403
Well it is like how Marvel and Fox both could use Quicksilver because he is both an X-Men character and Avengers character. Those rights have wiggle room when they talk about associated characters.

>>150084963 (OP)
why are there like 4 fucking spider-women and why are 2 of them brown?

>>150087485
To get as close to Spider-Rangers without relying on clones or getting Peter to actually show up.

>>150087312
>So we have a superhero movie where none of them can fucking do anything. And apparently the alternate scripts had stuff like them protecting baby Peter Parker.
Marvel/Feige put a stop to that, which is why Ezekiel's dialogue is all ADR. They had to completely scrap the original plot.

>>150085349
Their executives are just that retarded, the email leaks way back really was an illuminating look behind the curtains of their incompetence and I doubt much has changed since then.

>>150087661
we could have had 3 cinematic comic book universes

>>150084963 (OP)
Needs braces

>>150084984
They seriously should've accentuated her massive tits more

>>150085349
Good scriptwriters? Good directors? No executive meddling ruining things further? Naahhhh!

>>150087333
>all those eye wrinkles
>dugs
Prolonged use of makeup

>>150084963 (OP)
Born to play as Felicia Hardy.

>>150085349
Remember when they put Morbius back in theaters cause a meme was trending?

>>150084963 (OP)
>5. - It's an expression of pain.

They lack a Wood Rocket logo.

>>150085001
>>150085158
what is her superpower?

>>150084963 (OP)
They could've made so much cash if this movie was just the bare minimum okay, all it needed to be was a superhero flick with hot chicks in it, they weren't gonna follow the actual comic books anyway so they at least could've either A, did something original or B, make something that would appeal to the masses. Why did they think teasing everyone, from the audience of the film to the marketing these suits, and then use them for less than a minute in the actual film? If they played their cards right women on twitter could've called them "QUEENS" and "MOTHERS" and made those "X character being X for X minutes" meanwhile dudes could've drawn "fan art" for 'em. It doesn't even have to be good to do those things, it can be bad and do those things, instead it was boring. How are exces so retarded?

>>150087704
Schwaaa!

It feels like Marvel heroines are cursed to never have a good adaptation.

>>150087661
That email where someone talks about how Spider-man should do endurance/mud races, say "NBD", and use Snapchat stories because it would make him 'buzzworthy and cool' haunts me to this day. Obviously, we all knew corporate buzzwords were a thing, but to see them used so unironically, by people who genuinely think they're doing great work was just chilling.

>>150087095
No one gives a shit about Jessica Drew.

Julia Carpenter has always been the best Spider-Woman, both for having the simplest origin and the coolest power.

Hell, with Sydney Sweeney being in demand, I'm shocked that Disney isn't moving to get her made part of the Avengers going forward as Julia and letting Tom Holland fuck off to play faggots in indie films.

>>150091496
Remember, every idea sounds good when you're high on coke.

>>150085349
There is none with a longterm view with a vision and a hand for a good director/writer. Everything has to be test screened and mass appealing.
They are the AI slop of a media company.

>>150086857
Comic Accurate Red Skull as in the skull being a mask?

>>150085349
Amy Pascal and Avi Arad have this "Jade Wilson" mentality that because Spider-Man is so popular that means they can make movies about his villains and fans are gonna watch them even if they don't have Spidey innit

>>150085204
>>150085185

i dont care abut any of these extraneous spider characters they only dilute the brand. that being said i would sex all 4 of those girls if given the chance. preferably in their costumes .

>>150085204
Wheres her ass?

>>150085158
>>150085001
mirin the fro honestly

Isabela Moner/Merced is so damn fine

>>150091933
>Hell, with Sydney Sweeney being in demand

Two parts of her, at any rate.

>>150084963 (OP)
Why do they have spider theme? Aside from the madame herself? Like I get it's a premonition but like why are the rest of them spiders too?

>>150085041
>>150085171
this looks like a pretty cool suit. Streets ahead of the crappy MCU one

>>150092414
They still think thats why Joker worked.

>>150085001
Is there ANY reason this character couldn’t have been white???

>>150084963 (OP)
Built for getting punched by Carol Danvers and having her daughter ripped from her arms

>>150093860
Hey, she's not old enough to be a single parent yet. Wait a decade or so.

>>150084969
is a odd mix between 90s and 2000s

>>150092940
All of Sydney, at any moment

>>150093860
And then Carol spills her spaghetti over how sexy she is?

>>150084963 (OP)
why does she have down's eyes?

>>150087403
>>150087457
But even if they can they usually won't because it will either do free publicity for the other company or look bad in comparison when you could had a character that didn't compare.

>>150093092
yeah
the same executives that see Joker and can't identify antyhing that makes it different from every other superhero movie besides the titular IP are the ones who think they can get every actor scanned so they can have some intern use their face and get the same quality of movie.

bump

What is the point of the masks if they do nothing to obscure who is wearing it? At least in comics the eyes are white so that at least hides eye color/shape. You can literally see 80% of these people's faces.

>>150094610
I guess it is more a situation were you want a Spider-Man movie aka the Soidey-Audience but dont want to pay the expensive Spider-Man actor.