Thread 150090655

I checked the artist. He specializes in vore

>>150090655 (OP)
>>150090675

>>150090688
It's also the same artist who does the bee art that gets spammed here sometimes. I think OP is either the artist themselves shilling or an autist who really likes their favorite vorephile artist

>>150090675
>>150090688
Why the fuck would you lie about something so obviously untrue? Do you think you're the only one here with an FA account?

>>150090745
>Why the fuck would you lie about something so obviously untrue?
Anon, he does vore perspective porn. His 621 is fucking filled with large women opening hyper detailed mouths.

You autist.

>>150090655 (OP)
>vore artist
>owl oc
I can believe it without having to visit a furfag site

>>150090758
Seems more like generic oral fetishism rather then true vore

>>150090688
FUCK

I actually liked this art, how can I imagine a big fluffy owl mommy without imagining her trying to eat me in a non-oral fashion?

>>150090758
I don't think you know what vore is anon. I understand that you may have been traumatized in the past but gratuitous mouth shots =/= vore. Unless of course you want to stand here and argue about how he's the first vore artist in history to never actually draw anyone getting eaten.

>>150090797
>>150090688
There is no vore people

>>150090793
>>150090804
This heavily fucking rhymes with vore

>>150090814
Yeah this looks more vore adjacent with the detail inside of the mouth, the other examples are more focused on the plushness of the tongue however

>>150090814
You're just a retard that doesn't understand oral fixations

>>150090826
>the other examples are more focused on the plushness of the tongue however
The problem is that 50/50. Tongue detail do play a large part in vore

>>150090830
Uh huh

So is it fucking vore or not? This shit weirds me out either way

>>150090814
Okay I guess we're going with option 2 then, you dumb mother fucker
>>150090826
He always draws detailed mouths, he clearly enjoys them. However if you pay close attention to these images you'll find at no point is there any actual fucking vore.

>>150090857
>However if you pay close attention to these images you'll find at no point is there any actual fucking vore.
If a girl is drawn being penetrated but there is no penis visible, does that make it non-penetration art?

>>150090855
Appeals but does not directly illustrate. That's the best explanation you are going to get in this thread.

>>150090873
>can you compare this apple to this orange for me
I like how instead of even contemplating the idea that someone can enjoy mouth shots without enjoying cannibalism you have instead choosen to die on the hill of "the artist who doesn't draw vore is totally a vore artist"

>>150090655 (OP)
Furry "fandom" goes on >>>/trash/

>>150090855
Its not, the dude just has a mouth fetish

>>150090928
>I like how instead of even contemplating the idea
I did and I don't believe it. His female characters almost always tower over the self-insert
>can you compare this apple to this orange for me
If you can't infer the obvious point I am trying to make when your claim two actors have to be present for vore art is not founded than you are being disingenuous

I think you are just an autist who likes making threads about their artist and is now defensive that you never put 2 and 2 together. That's fine, I have made similar mistakes before but the only person trying to die on a hill here is you anon

>>150090943
The only good post in the entire thread.

>>150090873
Thats really not the same thing. In your specific example there would almost always be multiple clear indications of the action taking place with the subject matter even if its off screen. Here however you're taking the presence of the detailed mouths, absent any other context, and assuming vore will happen with an unseen viewer.

>>150090971
Accusing me of being an autist (and the op for that matter) while seemingly being incapable of accepting that specific fetishes aren't inherently connected is very silly anon.

>>150090999
>Here however you're taking the presence of the detailed mouths, absent any other context, and assuming vore will happen with an unseen viewer.
But there are also examples of these shots being done overhead with a large actor. That does tick tropes consistent with a vore theme.

>>150091038
>seemingly being incapable of accepting that specific fetishes aren't inherently connected is very silly anon.
Anon, being unable to understand that one or two things can be linked IS autism. This is what we call binary thinking. The artist does have a mouth fixation, but that does not mean they don't do vore art either. Both can be true.

>>150091042
Again you're clearly ignoring the context here. The subject is talking about making out, and if you go through the artists gallery there are multiple examples of invitations to kiss and/lick one another while there are no examples of vore. The obvious assumption from this is that its a mouth fetish and not a vore fetish at play here.

>>150090957
Me thinks the overal lack of saliva is what pushes it from closet vore, to just mouth fetish

Look guys, there's a simple middle ground here:
Hes probably done private commissions for vore (he's a furry, he obviously has) which is where he gets some experience in the drawing of mouths for his own oral fixation.

>>150091057
Anon, being unable to accept that certain things dont have to be linked is autism. Its called binary thinking. The artist does have a mouth fixation, but that does not mean they do vore art. Both don't need to be true here.

Mouthshots are fine (my specific fetish is for sharp teeth so sometimes more than fine) as long as no niggas are actually getting ate

>>150091072
>>150091109
We are just going to have to agree to disagree here. The red flags are there and if you can't see them you can't see them.

>>150091098
>>150091111
This is the best middle ground we are going to get.

>>150091137
After going through his whole gallery on E6 I'm definitely leaning towards him NOT being a vorefag. 95% of his art is boob and ass shots and the few mouth centric ones he does have dont really feel very vore like. The rest are feet/paw stuff.

>>150091207
For example take this one. No actual vorefag would ever draw something like this. https://e621.net/posts/3706337?q=parent%3A3706337

Awesome sauce