Thread 150210440

And has oversexulization of cartoon women in the past hurt kids, both female and male?

Anything that prevents kids to become fags.

>>150210440 (OP)
Are you from some parallel reality or some shit? Even in the 80s, cartoon women were just good looking, not bombshells, Jessica Rabbit aside. Now they're downright ugly or abstract to a point they barely resemble a human's anatomy.

>>150210481
The OP didn't want an actual discussion. He just wanted to post a lust provoking image so people would dump more April pics because OP is too lazy to go to R34 and wants to make it everyone's problem.

>>150210440 (OP)
First define oversexualization in relation to regular sexualization.

>>150210440 (OP)
More. Women should be encouraged to look good.

>>150210440 (OP)
They should have made a TMNT live action back in 2005 back when Christina Hendricks was young enough to pull off April.

>>150210492
OP here. Can’t both things be true. Why do you think it’s always one or the other?

>>150210440 (OP)
I like boobs

>>150210440 (OP)
Characters created for young kids like Minnie Mouse and Daisy Duck should never be sexualized.
But human like the Winx Club girls or Lois Lane, should always be sexualized.

>>150210445
what if it turns girls into lesbians

>>150211130
I like swords.

>>150210445
So you think grooming is ok if it's straight. Go to church.

>>150211240
That’s good being it sexualized the girl without degrading their virginal innocence with penetration. Cartoon yuri is cute without being raunchy.

>>150211226
>boring looking generic humans should be sexualized
>toons shouldn't

Why is 1987 April O’Neil consistently sexualized?
She never got naked on the show.

>>150211265
"grooming" is a newfag meme from feminist social media. I don't remember people in the 2000s and 2010s posting about that shit.

>>150211255
Swords are awesome, I like dinosaurs myself.

>>150211240
Lesbians are fine as long as you’re not one of those faggots with a consent fetish.

>>150211317
Breaking: seething pedophile faggot takes a break from grooming boys to argue about the usage of words.

>>150211265
Yes.

>>150211265
You can't be groomed into being straight

>>150211476
You were

>>150210440 (OP)
There is zero canon oversexulization. Everything on /co/ or whatever is fan art and what we WANT April to look like, huge tits and still the same character.

If I was in charge of a show, a girl would have huge boobs like that and be a main girl and be a good show because it'd be written well both character and plot wise. They don't add huge boobs because they are all fuckin tranny. Also, it'd be all ages, because huge boobs are a part of everyday life, get over it pussies.

>>150210440 (OP)
>do we need more or less?
Lots more.
>has oversexulization of cartoon women in the past hurt kids, both female and male?
DKDC.

>>150211308
Cleavage.

>>150211486
Says who? The HIV magnet? Get a hold of yourself lmao

>>150211308
Because she is drawn as an adult woman and with sizeable bosom of the 80s. The others are a contemporary 2003 woman and children under the age of 13.

Okay

>>150210440 (OP)
More. Big tits don't hurt at all

>>150213044
What about young girl’s self image?

>>150210440 (OP)
Can't you perverts just watch anime like normal adults? Kids shows don't need that shit.

>>150211486
Tell me where Uncle Steve takes you. Being straight is the natural order of things. Faggotry is not

Sexy Kino

>>150213044
This anon gets it.

>>150213064
who cares?

Cheesy

>>150213064
The positive body images from these cartoons is what they should be striving for.

Bump

I don’t see the problem as long as it’s not NSFW.

>>150210440 (OP)

>Do we need more?

Yes. I can't think of any western shows that really sexualize women anymore.

>Has it hurt kids in the past.

No. The people that started complaining about it in the 2010s were adult women taking out their insecurities on cartoons that looked better than them.

>>150210440 (OP)
Your thread is already biased and wrong from the get go; There is no such thing as "oversexualization" a nonsense term used predominantly by sexless autistic people to describe things that are normal.

>>150211344
This. So much this.

>>150211344
What?

Need more sexo Renet

Yes, but also remove every last trace of faggotry

Where’s the art?

>>150210440 (OP)
Need more oversexulization of cartoon men. Every cartoon male should be showing dick bulge

All they have to do is filter out DeviantArt searches from character Google results and that would eliminate 80% of that issue. Kids shouldn't be on here or Reddit and that eliminates another 15% of the issue. The last 5% is up to chance and kids just stumble into things. I think at that point it's natural and you're gonna be into whatever you're into. Who cares at that point.

New

>>150211280
>>150211344

I hope the next TMNT adaptation makes April and Renet lovers.

>>150217174
>>150214554
>>150212346

Cheesy

>>150211265
Yes.

>>150210440 (OP)
there has literally never been an American cartoon that looked like picrel, that wasn't animated by B*kshi

>>150211308
the 80 TMNT is the one everyone watched. even though 2003 is better

>>150218400
I disagree

>>150210440 (OP)
We need more, but make it tasteful. Good looking people are nice to look at regardless

>>150218457
>ugly as sin
>guaranteed to not have lovingly-animated breasts purely for the titillation of the male audience
You could at least have posted some meme Franco-Belgi-Dutch cartoon only five people know about.

>>150210440 (OP)
What type of fag question is this, I thought we were a proper board once

>>150213359
So it's okay for a female child to marry an adult man because it's not faggotry? It's still degeneracy at the end of the day, even moreso because there is no consent.

Kids can't consent because they're not old enough to, they can't live on their own like adults can, holy shit.

>>150218522
Dude you need to watch Vampire Cretaceous. She had some gratuitous shots.

>>150218522
Anon you need to watch Camp Cretaceous. She gets some gratuitous shots.

>>150218689
the art is fundamentally unattractive.

>>150218548
Thanks for pointing out the obvious you stupid faggot

>>150218757
Really?
I thought you guys were saying pedophilia was okay as long as it was not fags

Then again /co/ isn't a hivemind, it's with how loud the vocal minority can be compared to the actual regular people on here

>>150218548
>so it's okay for an adult man to marry a child
yes

>>150218816
Why?

>>150218856
so the girl can be raised to be the ideal wife directly by her husband, rather than a man hoping another man did his job properly AND the girl somehow managed to be shielded from subversive influence during the years she spent as an independent woman. It's simply a better outcome for all parties.

>>150218816
I know it must be hard relating to women your age when you've been mentally stagnant since age 14, but i know you can grow again if you really try

>>150219106
14 is a little old for me, honestly

>>150219084
So not allowing the girl to think for themselves?

Anyway have a lust provoking image to keep on subject

>>150219084
Where did these rules for men even come from that they have to raise a girl to be the ideal wife? Why do you even need an ideal wife? I don't even want a family

>>150219451
women don't think, they feel. they "felt" that they wanted social independence, and the end result was skyrocketing rates of depression suicide and stress-related health issues in women. They're not capable of making responsible decisions for themselves as a whole, and they are not equal to men. Hierarchy is not inherently evil, and the belief that it is has done untold damage to western society.

>>150219498
because you have been so demoralised that you no longer view society as something worth contributing to. it's not your fault, society as a whole is an absolute trainwreck. but in better times, you would not think the way you do.

>>150219528
Do you have any science to back up that women can't think?

>>150219576
I mean I do wanna contribute to society by getting a job and engaging with public events. Hell even drawing art for people is contributing to society because you're giving them something to be entertained and invested in. There are many ways to contribute to society without forcing yourself to have a family.

Where did all these Christ is king fags come from? I thought this was a titty thread

>>150219593
He probably doesn't interact with women enough to even have anecdotal evidence. Any "scientific" evidence he has is gonna be some youtube video from a retarded wifebeater or an article he only read the title of

>>150220023
Of course

>>150219593
the fact they have something like ⅓ less brain mass than men, for one

>>150219654
who said anything about Christianity? a bit of a mask-slip moment for you there

>>150220133
I figured the people who believed this shit were Christ is king fags.

And what's funny is that brain mass has fuck all to do with IQ. However can you show me the shit you read up as proof that women are dumber than men?

>>150220307
women on average also have lower IQs than men.

>>150220658
how fucking dare you

>>150218400
>It's ok to animate this because it's actually a le guy

Is ranma even good? I wonder how many trannies it created but at the same time I feel like trannies wouldn't watch Ranma.

>>150210440 (OP)
Are we not doing Funbags Fridays with that image Animaniacs yako this week?

>>150210440 (OP)
We need more. Much more.
>hurr stop sexualizing women you sexist incel!
Nothing stops animators from oversexualize men.

>>150220133
>something like ⅓ less brain mass than men
Their overall brain mass is only 10 percent less than men.

>>150210992
People in general should be. It would not only get many people out of their funk, it would also likely make for a healthier population.

>>150221561
>women need separate IQ tests from men to ensure the average is the same
>a man with a the brain the size of a woman would be a clinically diagnosed retard
go ask your mother what the liquid in a bottle does if she tilts it at an angle.

>>150218522
>>150218740
moron

>>150210440 (OP)
>do we need more or less
More.
>And has oversexulization of cartoon women in the past hurt kids, both female and male?
No.

Sexiness doesn't make a bad cartoon good but it always make it better, I've never seen an example of it being a con.