>>150867497
>forcible suppression of opposition
Didn't happen. Opposite parties or differing beliefs were fully allowed to vote, speak, entertain, homilize, etc.
>belief in a natural social hierarchy
You're going to have to elaborate how that's not something prevalent everywhere around the world.
I'm guessing this is the "rule of the elites," I hear so much on Fox. This feels absurd, because why would the elites want to have extended rights for the disenfranchised?
>subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of a race
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. That in the interest of a minority group, that certain interests/rights of the majority should be taken away?
>There’s little(sic) difference of the actions of them and the SA or Musselini’s Squadrisimo, except the party and race they claim to defend
Now you're just taking the piss.
>>150867507
From what I understand, 17 suspects were arrested but only two of them charged. They organized a protest outside an ICE facility where they brought fireworks. One person in the group hid in the trees with a firearm. The prosecutor claims that they were ALL in it on it, instead of just one or two guys, which is dubious.
This is also beside the point: if we are attacking Antifa as an operation, then you're not looking at the actions of individuals, but of the system they operate in. It would be like saying that Homeowner's Associations condone murder and then cite a few individuals who are HOA and have committed murders, but ignoring the fact that HOA has nothing to do with committing such crimes.
When has Antifa, as a whole, proposed for authoritarian changes?
