>>150967380
WB was originally going to be bought out by Fox during the 2010s. In retrospect I always wondered if that would've been the best outcome since it would mean they wouldn't be bought by Disney when they did
>>150967460
There's no reason for MS to buy Warner.
Of all the players, the ones with a chance of winning this one are:
Paramount, which will probably buy it.
Concast, perhaps.
Disney can't buy the rest for monopoly reasons, Sony doesn't have the money.
Perhaps an Arab group.
>>150968027
No, Paramount is a paper tiger and WB already rejected them and just used their interest to get others to bid. Comcast is the most likely winner due to their established synergy with WB and how relatively seamless that transition would be. It's hundred percent happening.
>>150967411
The only good thing about Disney buying anythign especially a cursed thing like Warner is that it would force them to waste billions and then they can die. And don't say theme parks rescue Disney because Universal is eating Disney's theme park money.
