>>151059627
the issue is that it's not always, and if fact likely hardly ever, "third worlders"- which in and of itself strips the issue from any nuance, people want it to be an indian or a third worlder or a brown or whatever in order to have an easy boogeyman to distance themselves from, because in reality the real issue is just tourists, but they'll never say it, because they themselves are tourists
when someone knows they are the problem they try and deflect or find other issues
you know that thing male feminists do when they say "those goddamn WHITE, STRAIGHT, CIS, PRIVILEGED, RICH, ATTRACTIVE men" instead of just "those men"? they want to create a mild long separation between them and the group they hate to try and say "ok but, i don't share some of those traits so i'm the good guy"
same thing here
>ugh, those annoying newfag tourists-
>*realizes he himself is a newfag tourist"
>-WHO ARE ALSO BROWN!