The heads on the bottom reminded me of "collect them all" ads for crappy plastic toys.
>>151110680
There's a few problems with it beyond just "how dare he change something."
1. It's being paid for by rich donors. That's bad. We do not want a President that's (even more) in the debt of rich people. When he thinks of who is paying his bills we want him to think of the American voter.
2. Potential for corruption in the form of fundraisers. You are not meant to use the trappings of office, like the white house, to raise money for political gain (No "Republican fundraiser" in the White House). This will absolutely be used for that.
3. Potential for corruption in the form of "paying for a moment of time with the President." This gives the ultrawealthy a very good venue to pay for a chance to pull the President aside for a moment and have "just a brief talk" with him, except the talk doesn't have to be as brief as it does at other venues. It makes backdoor shenanigans even easier.
4. Asbestos. I mean it's low on the priority list but it does look like there was asbestos in the walls and nobody involved cleaned it up properly (sending the signal nobody else should either). It's a little thing, but, fuck, really? You couldn't even clear out the poison-packaging?
5. This is arguably the most important one. It gives Cartoonists like Ben a chance to draw more Trump Architecture pretending like it isn't ugly as fuck. You look at that golden soda machine Ben drew and tell me it isn't cringe.
