>>151137300 (OP)
If you understand how capitalists build and commies destroy, then you have your answer.
It's not just capitalism is 'le good' so much as it's sensical and as merit-based as humans are ever going to get, while commies pretending to care about everyone's feelings, (when of course they actually don't), is obviously a dysfunctional and counterproductive environment.
Picrel is worth a look, though it's unnecessarily long-winded, even this guy in the can tell you in 1988 why you don't hire 50% women or a pack of commies, (avoid more recent editions because I noticed some post-90's cucked language on his website).
tl;dr: An imbalance or excess of certain personality types at different stages of a companies growth cycle will fuck shit up royal. Even the founder themselves can easily screw shit up with their own brand of bullshit, and you're familiar with that if you've ever worked in a small business where the boss keeps most of the necessary day-to-day operating information in his own head.
This is just one faggot's model of shit people have been noticing in business and human organisations since day dot. That whenever you build shit it will tend to attract the wrong kind of people, ('people-people'), who only care about social status, looking important/virtuous, being in charge of other people, (ie. jannies and various other fuckwits), instead of actual productivity, whether it be manufacturing widgets or movie production, and what happens if you let the inmates run the asylum.
Worth reading since it helps you pick stonks and predict trends. Like I could see the rot creeping into both Disney and Marvel before they got to their peak and were earning billions per film, and was able to accurately predict it's decline and demise, (also why it can't recover and keeps spiraling), long before everyone else even knew there was a problem and failure seemed impossible or very far away, (so not just generalised shit like 'muh superhero fatigue').
