>>151189278
This outcome is much better honestly >Oh look at that, look at that they're gonna kiss! Look! >HA! The snake stopped it right before hand! Eat shit and die, shippers.
I'd be angrier if it DID happen, honestly. Fuck that trope and fuck whoever invented it.
>>151189278 >>151189403
After reading the description I always thought that would be the most awkward way of revealing that Nick was planning to propose. >be on a stakeout >about to catch a criminal >yeah let me just make sure the ring I could probably barely afford is still in my pocket where it could easily fall out during a chase
>>151189278
Regardless of if they do or don’t end up together, I think people are forgetting that this movie takes place like a week after the first one.
People don’t usually get married a couple of weeks after meeting each other.
>>151189653
Someone posted a full plot leak on here about the movie and between some of the legitimate information they squeezed some fake shipping stuff [including the alleged post credits scene].
I thought it was weird from the beginning since its rare if ever standard Disney movie has a post credit scene.
>>151189864 >reposting bullshit.
Its literally a direct statement from the movies DIRECTOR saying the scene is fake.
Explain to me without deflecting how its 'bullshit' when the proof couldn't be more concrete.
>>151189981 >Deflection count: 1
Explain how its bullshit. If you deflect without directly answering I'll accept it as you conceding that youre just trolling / rage baiting.
>>151190450
You have failed to explain how its trolling multiple times.
You have officially conceded youre rage baiting until I hear legitimate logic on how a director confirming something about a movies plot is 'bullshit'
>>151190521
No concession given. You've gone through multiple threads posting that shitpost just because you want to stir up fights. You're the troll. Fuck off.
>>151190548 >its shitposting to post a director talking about his movie >still no explanation how
Conceding accepted. I will not be replying to you further until I am given legitimate evidence or explanation how its trolling.
>>151189423
The funny thing is that is EXACTLY how movie protagonists think when planning to propose
They ALWAYS take the stupidest fucking risks and chose the mathematically worst moments
>>151193889
That would inflate the cost even more and it's harder than you think to do. Also would make cleaning a massive pain. I think the only way they could do it for cheap is make a sort of sleeve/fursuit to go over the doll body.
>>151193912
ehhh then it would be loose against the body without velcro or something to hold it in place and even then not ideal because you'd have zippers/buttons/velcro seams. It's already a niche luxury item but I wonder if there's innovation that could be made regarding flexible materials and fur solutions
