>>11347509
Not really, but maybe you have to have been generating AI slimes for a bit to spot it easily?
First one I'm pretty sure was generated using PonyDiffusion or some derived model, from its style. I've made stuff very similar to it. Notice the penis bulging unnaturally where it enters her. Also the cum isn't flowing in the liquid, it's being squirted like its in the air. The AI doesn't understand that "advanced" context, very typical. In general the transparency on her is screwed.
Second one may be Pony or Illustrious, doubt it's Flux cuz Flux anime images has often a really sharp and crisp style. Anyway it's a stock standard and boring AI style, very recognizable, it lacks any personal flair but don't really reach the professional anime quality it's trying to imitate. Notice the artifacting of the barn fences in the background, they dont make sense. The right boob lacks its nipple that should be visible from this angle. The face if screwy and her eyes are typical AI eyes, artists don't render eyes like that. For some reason pov sex is very common in AI work, and you get it often like here where it's not quite pov but at an angle besides the boy yet the girl will be looking at us and not the boy she's fucking.
Last one is by RagnarokKnight a known AI artist, but he actually give a damn and keeps a recognizable style. I quite like him. AI spots are someone harder with AI artists that bother with quality. Here I think the penis looks like it's on top of her stomach? A real artist would never make a mistake like this I think. It was probably hard to generate it inside properly (AI often struggle with transparency). Otherwise it's hard to tell, its a good AI piece.
Sorry for the wall of text, I just think it might be of help for you guys. I don't have a problem with AI if it's good, but it should be kept separate from the real art so the slop flood doesn't drown away the actual talent.
