>>2911019 (OP)If you do not yet own this mistake, stop wanting it because it's a bad idea. Needing a basement is not a feature, it reflects insufficient land for proper single storey construction.
You will be unable to understand why multi-storey homes are bad forever homes, but stairs guarantee falls sooner or later. If you have stairs, you have restrictions to movement of objects and furniture and people, especially as they age and mobility declines. That's why so many old people don't use the top of their prized homes...any more.
You have time to study so study until you have no questions. That's how I do it because it works and is proven over decades of my own and many other lives, and when you do it all the time you learn how to learn ever more efficiently. I chose properties for EASY modification and enhancement, not masochistic crusades whose result would be anti-functional and limiting for the rest of my days. That's why they remain easy to maintain single-handed.
What good is a home for a self-sufficient DIYer without ample space for ground-level garages and the workshop that changes the rest of their life by slashing overhead?
Spend on LAND first, not structures. Start small then add or modify as you go. Cities are limiting therefore bad. Property zoned agricultural, preferably at least five acres in the US (see relevant local zoning) is generally good but research its and nearby GIS and plat maps.
>>2911256This, but amateurs buy before they think because they imagine feelings wise.
Given a lot and a home, the smart (never do anything with property not coldly pragmatic) play IF one already fucked up and owns the mess is fix the home and strengthen it before faffing about with basement dreams. Why do people even want to live in such a restricted area where you think you need a basement? They're more limiting than empowering, unless you design for easy ground entrance or have a shop elsewhere.
I did not buy such a property because I know better.