What's the best smart lock?
>What if someone hacks it?
If someone is willing to hack your lock they'll just break the window, they're for home owner convenience

>>2926858 (OP)
>If someone is willing to hack your lock
You don't get it; most people will use the same code for years and the wear and/or dirt makes it obvious what buttons were pushed, now instead of 1000 possible combinations it's only 16.

>>2926880
That thing dies within a year, before the prints become apparent

>>2926858 (OP)
I'd look into cattle farms that are using rfid tags on their livestock, if your going to have smart locks go opensource so you can integrate lights curtains skylights w/e is clever.
bill gates has spoken about this idea in multiple tabloids, if it works for cows it will work for you.

>>2926858 (OP)
Absolutely dumbfounded that people want these carbuncles anywhere near their property.
How is typing in a code or whatever any more convenient than a key?
And saying they will just beak window lol, no, if a burglar can easily get inside quickly and quietly without noise or destruction then they will do that, and guess what, your insurance isn't going to pay out either.
Thieves could easily carry around a big key and knock your door to get car keys but they don't, the spend a few thousand on signal repeaters to trick the car into starting and then drive away without the key. That's how much a quiet get away is worth to them.

I use pic related. It requires a smart phone, but it's more discreet than a number pad, and instead of changing the code, you can just revoke access on a case by case basis.

>>2926858 (OP)
one that isn't smart, keys are fine.

>>2926939
>How is typing in a code or whatever any more convenient than a key?
because you can lose a key or can'r tell someone a key remotely

>>2927023
>can'r tell someone a key remotely
in 30 years of home ownership i've not had the need to let someone into my house remotely, one single time.
>you can lose a key
you think the kind of idiots that buy smart locks won't forget a code?

>>2927058
>in 30 years of home ownership i've not had the need to let someone into my house remotely, one single time
Do you not have friends?

>>2927064
>Do you not have friends?
yes, why would i want to let me friends into my house when i'm not there?

>>2926939
>the spend a few thousand on signal repeaters to trick the car into starting and then drive away without the key
Then why aren't people stealing Teslas

>>2927065
To check on your pets when you're on vacation or something

>>2927066
>why aren't people stealing Teslas
build quality most probably.

>>2927068
kek

>>2927067
>check on your pets
i don't have emotional slaves that i neglect by going on holiday without them and if i did i'd just give a key to my neighbours. you do talk to your neighbours, don't you anon?

>>2927071
I think you're just weird

>>2927072
so you don't talk to your neighbours anon? sad really.

>>2927067
My pets come with me on vacation. Do yours not come with? You're not poor, are you?

>>2926858 (OP)
I just got a regular Schlage from home depot. being afraid of break-ins is a third-worlder mindset, there hasn't been a break-in in my neighborhood in over a decade because we don't let browns move in to any houses here. Just buy an expensive house in a nice neighborhood far away from any "bad schools" or "MLK jr blvd" and you'll be fine, what are you, poor?

It's helpful for renting too, I rent two of my bedrooms out and they each have their own code.

>>2927644
You take your horses on holiday?

>>2926858 (OP)
Those locks often have a very shitty backup manual lock that can be raked open as well as being able to be bypassed entirely by using a strong magnet to actuate the solenoid. Just get a good normal lock and don't worry about it. I can't think of anything that has ever been made better by being "smart".

>>2927692
meant for >>2927526

>>2926858 (OP)
>the best dumb lock, not electric
Simplex makes nice pushbutton locks that don't need power. Jews like them.

>>2928062
Jews are spending $500 on a push button lock?

>>2928158
Contrary to popular belief they aren't that good with money

>>2926984
>It requires a smart phone,
>phone dies
>can't get in house
I would rather RFID than something that has a battery.

>>2927058
>you think the kind of idiots that buy smart locks won't forget a code?
Not the ones that use the same code for everything, my Dad still uses his birth date for a bunch of stuff.

>>2928212
>Dad still uses his birth date for a bunch of stuff
I would say I feel attacked but it's more comical to me than anything else

>>2926858 (OP)
Kaba x10

I don't use smart locks, I use these.
No need for phone/app bullshit.
And you can't brute force the combo since it locks up for like 15 minutes after 4 or 5 failed codes.

>>2926939
>How is typing in a code or whatever any more convenient than a key?
It's actually super convenient. My car has keyless entry and push button start, and I leave the remote fob in the car when I'm at home. I leave my license and credit cards in my car since I only need them when I go out. And the entry doors on my house and garage/shop all have push button locks on them. I never have to carry anything in my pockets aside from my phone and all the micro-conveniences really add up.

>>2928179
Have you considered the possibility of unlocking your house with your key in the unlikely event that your phone dies?

>>2926858 (OP)
Look very carefully at what you're buying. Manufacturers may rely on 'it's electronic, the customer will assume it's safe'.
When I went to boarding school one day they thought it would be a good idea to change all the locks for electric ones, with an RFID, probably so students don't loose expensive keys. What they installed was 2 plastic covers on the inside and outside on a motorized lock. The inside was a push button which would toggle the lock. The outside was an RFID thing. Ofc I had to try and it took 5 minutes:
Pop off the outside cover. Forget about that, not doing computers here. The through hole in the door still exists. Buttons are connected to the main unit by wiring with simple pinheader plugs.
You could unitonically reach for the wires going to the inside button with a wire, unplug them, pull the plug out the outside of the door, short them et voila. Once on the inside you could just put it all together again.
Yeah that was for indoor application but still: Do those people not think? At least add a divider plate when you have a button option.
Look out for attack vectors like that.

>>2932215
You clearly aren't american

>>2932286
Nigga, picking locks is fucking easy and a way more attainable skill to the average jerk off than fucking with the electronics.

>>2932304
>You clearly aren't american
I am, however I'm curious as to why you would think I'm not.

>>2926858 (OP)
if it is named smart [thing] then is a fucking meme https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5V4nrW5ASKs

buy a dimple or disc lock or one of these babies https://www.bowleylockcompany.com/

And if u want extra protection against Tyron get a multi lock door

>>2932247
Not him but I thought it meant it required both
Like those car keys with the chip

>>2932395
Oh, want me to explain further? It's because your country is a voolent-crime ridden shit-hole with 0 safe havens. But keep baiting I guess.

>>2932501
The areas you're describing only comprise like 20% of the country. There are vast swaths of area full of mostly white people and almost no crime. It's very nice and we don't have to worry about shit. The United States isn't only the garbage places the news shows you.

>>2926858 (OP)
Nuki (https://nuki.io/) just recently got "Works with Home Assistant" certified, which means they've got long term full local network support so no cloud bullshit (unless you're into that). Haven't used them personally though.

>>2932213
anyone look for these for you workshed or whatever because you can't be bothered to have the key on your always and rather just remember the code