>>18495958
also get handmade over the normal ones, they're specifically listed as 3.5 and 5.5 handmade
they're flexible instead of stiff. i have a 3mm rope from him and it's nice but stiff and the cuts aren't that sharp compared to the way the handmade rope looks or peruvian jacoje gold ropes
>>18495961
is that 22?
it might be your posture but 22 seems to sit just below the collar bone on you. that's a very good length for wide collar shirts like wife beaters or if you wear button ups and leave the top buttons open which is my go to. if you prefer normgroid crewneck shirts you'll want longer if you find that your 20" gets swallowed by a crewneck a lot.
it might just be the angle but that looks like a choker almost. 18-20 inches on most guys are just below the collar which is pretty short.
it kind of depends on the look you're going for. vintage look is either very short or very long, 16-18" or 26-30". if you like normgroid tshirts the trend is a 24~ inch. cubaknow loco on youtube can showcase that look or gusvillajewelry. i personally think it's negrified. but it's really up to how you want it to look, i just hate normal t shirts and adding a chain kind of looks crappy to me if it's a crappy shirt.
i don't have a problem with chains and wifebeaters but i prefer older styles so i'm biased towards moving away from crewneck zoomer fashion because every broccoli head has a shitty t shirt choking them and a big 24" chain.
my advice? see how the 20" looks in the shirts you like and if it gets swallowed by the collar when you move around. if it gets swallowed, go button up or something with a more open collar. if it doesn't then it's probably fine. but if you ever dress formally and want to show your chain off subtly with the top buttons open, if it's any more than just slightly beneath your collar bone it won't show. i run into that problem with my gucci links so i tend to wear my 20" pieces more in business casual