Thread 18502162

Will I be made fun of if I start tucking my t-shirts?

>>18502162 (OP)
probably not. early 90s fashion is back and this includes the tuck.

Only gays and Europeans (also gay) tuck their tshirts. OP is gay also (goes without saying) and so am I and every poster on this board.

Ciao.

>>18502162 (OP)
The opinions of NPCs don't matter. Tucking your shirt is based. It's what civilized men do.

>>18502162 (OP)
No.
>>18502163
That's 80s.

>>18502169
I think it's 90s anon

>>18502167
As you can see, it creates a clean silhouette and accentuates your natural proportions. It's even better if you're fit or just thin and have a flat belly. The reason people stopped tucking their shirt in the 2000s is because of the influence of American hood culture (and their saggy pants), and also because everyone started getting fat. So they stopped tucking to hide their pot bellies and break the clear demarcation of the torso and legs that a tucked shirt creates.

you need to have a flat stomach and wear high rise pants to tuck your tshirt.

>>18502296
Yep. Don't ever tuck your shirt with low rise. It looks like shit, and the shirt won't even stay in. And don't fucking sag your high rise pants to make look like low rise either.

>>18502296
Yep. Don't ever tuck your shirt with low rise pants. It looks like shit, and the shirt won't even stay in. And don't fucking sag your high rise pants to make it look like low rise either. Always wear high or at the very least mid rise, and pull your pants up. Don't sag them like a nigger.

>>18502162 (OP)
Sometimes it looks good, sometimes it looks bad. If you can't determine it yourself I think you shouldn't tuck to play it safe.

>>18502308
but most of all don't try this with graphic tees or you'll look like this guy

>>18502312
Nothing wrong with the way he's wearing his tee and pants. The guy and the print are just goofy.

>>18502162 (OP)
Tucking is based. It gives you good proportions, which is why zoomers are all into cropped tops these days. They want to have tucked proportions without the stuck-uppedness of a tucked shirt. You just have to not be fat, or else it'll look a bit cringe.

If you're
>fat
>unattractive
>male wearing high-rise pants/shorts
>male wearing low-rise pants/shorts
>male wearing casual shorts
yes.

You're an attractive man who has high fitness and purpose, you'll be fine.
...you ARE an attractive man with strong fitness and great purpose, right?

>>18502312
disagree. graphic tees (if they're good/modern ones not like one in pic) are the best things to tuck. since they're already casual and relaxed, you can tuck them in without looking too formal.

>>18502162 (OP)
you might get made fun of a little at first. there's a little bit of a learning curve to getting the vertical proportions (what size rise looks best on you) and the tuck itself right. you want it to kinda fold over and look clean like your pic. not like a muffin top or a sausage tube. can take some experimentation. don't ever tuck low rise millenial pants unless you look like steven tyler.
once you dial things in, it looks great see: >>18502167 >>18502177

If you are an adult you'll never made fun of, people will just gossip behind your back and call you weird

Maybe? How the fuck are we supposed to know?

If you're 12, maybe your online digital classmate will try roasting you, and your AI teacher will then send the two of an e-ticket for a chat exchange with the principal (remote in Hong Kong).

It's /fa/shion bro. Some fits call for the tuck, some don't. But the pic you've provided in terrible. Awful pieces, ghastly colour combo. If you're going to tuck, wear a belt at least...

>>18502162 (OP)
Proportions always look off without a tuck on regular lenght t-shirts.

>>18502431
true and double so if you are below like 5'10-6'
or even if you are tall if your body is short torso long leg shaped.

>>18502346
Even fat men will look more dignified and civilize if they tuck their shirt. And not in the potbelly popping over the belt kind of way, but with proper high rise pants that reach up to their belly button.

Please wear a belt if you tuck in your shirt.

>>18502162 (OP)
no

>>18502445
this, but here's the actual rule for the autistic guys on here who can't figure it out on their own:
if your pants have belt loops you must wear a belt.
exceptions:
- denim jeans are exempted from this rule, it is OK to wear them without a belt.
- if your pants have belt loops AND suspender buttons then you can pick which one to use.
- if you do not want to wear a belt or suspenders your pants must lack belt loops and either have an adjustable waist of some kind or be tailored to you.

i also wouldn't bother with most of the beltless options (other than suspenders, integrated belt, maybe side adjusters) if your torso is rectangular shape or if your waist is wider than your hips.
it'll always want to fall down and be uncomfortable.

>>18502162 (OP)
No, now let's see that genital bulge.

>>18502445
I have drawstring elastic pants, I own none with loops

>>18502575
You sound special needs

>>18502575
God I hate pants sagging subhumans so much it's unreal.

>>18502580
You'd best apologize

>>18502162 (OP)
Autistic people love to do this, like my ex and gf
Its because they feel more secure or something or more put together
I think it looks dumb, unless its for some utilitarian purpose

>>18502162 (OP)
No, if anything you'll get made fun of if you don't tuck your t-shirts. Untucked is juvenile and no one will respect you.

>>18502615
You're going to look stupid if you tuck a long tunic into your pants.

>>18502575
my problem with drawstrings is i have a hernia right where they hit, and durability. i had some pants with an integrated belt that was like karate belt material but more like a thicker drawstring in width. those pants kind of owned i think they have a tear that needs fixing.

>>18502162 (OP)
Yes. This first started catching on in late 2017 when skinny ripped pants and supreme started to fade out. I remember walking out of my apartment back then to pick up a DoorDash order from the curb.. and I decided I’d tuck in my black shirt to my acid wash jeans and see how that looked. Neighbors were staring at me weird. Walked back in and looked at myself in the mirror and I looked like a total jackass. Never did it again.

>>18502681
you looked like a jackass cause you did it with 2017 low rise pants.
in my non-flyover city you only see guys who are on the autism spectrum and the homeless with their shirts untucked.

>>18502680
Pull them up, sag fag

>>18502690
Ok

>>18502676
The guy is wearing a sash around his waist to highlight where his natural waist is. This gives him a proportionate silhouette. It isn't just a long tunic fluttering in the air on its own, like how fags these days wear t-shirts over their pants and erase their waistline. And then sag their pants like degenerates and make it look like their crotch is much lower than where it actually is.

>>18503667
>>18502441
That's fine and all but you can't do it with jeans. Or you can, but you need a belt and it ends up looking like non-jean attire whereas jeans are supposed to be casual workwear.

>>18503667
As a millennial, I apologize for these kind of t-shirts. I genuinely have no idea wtf we were thinking with that shit. It looks awful. Sorry guys.

>>18503667
What if the put a sash over there shirt? Would that be better? I ask because I own many of those shirts

>>18503694
aren't you supposed to tuck these t shirts?

On this topic, I really love the look of a French tucked sweater. Maybe it's because I'm tall and rather skinny, but it just looks fresh.

>>18502308
yeah i look like shit when i tuck in anything with my 511

>>18502308
Don't listen to this fag and tuck in your shirt anyway, low rise pants are just normal pants in our day and age, only dandy LARPers wear high rise pants

>>18503850
Your day and age is gay, faggot. Low rise aren't even made for tucking to begin with. The moment you raise your arms or bend a little, your shirt will get pulled out of your faggy low rise pants sitting at the middle of your ass.

I can’t tuck because I have freakishly wide hips for a man

I have to tuck because it is impossible for me to find a shirt with the correct length. Yeah I'm a manlet.

>>18503885
Same, brother

>>18503885
My wide hips make a neat silhouette since I'm slender (in my opinion)

>>18502162 (OP)
no, that's a certified /fa/ move, not to mention a timeless classic

>>18503701
No. Nobody wore t-shirts like that before Millennials. Longline t-shirts were a mid 2010s trend and were meant to be worn untucked.

>>18502162 (OP)
>Will I be made fun of if I start tucking my t-shirts?
Nobody cares, what the fuck are you in highschool still or something lmao?

>>18504505
They were popular before 2010, buckaroo

>>18504505
I remmember that trend. It was awful. Made all the worse because it was paired with super long versiond of jackets that weren't meant to be that long, like under hip long bomber jackets or type 3 denim jackets. Good thing it was a shortlived trend.

>>18504540
It was not short-lived, it reigned for centuries

>>18503700
Might look good with a real one, however my rough drawing looks shit

>>18502594
you ARE special needs

>>18504580
Don't make me set Big Brian upon you

>>18504520
They really weren't...

This was like a 2013-2017 thing. I recall my gf at the time specifically suggested I buy one back then.

>>18504581
Doesn't work. The shirt needs to be longer and up to at least the mid-thigh level to give it an overall balanced look.

>>18504632
Indeed

>>18504467
Try a different cut of pants to hide your feminine hips.

>>18502162 (OP)
Only do that if you have a belt and a collared shirt otherwise you look retarded

>>18504467
London?

>>18505798
No, America

>>18502166
>Ciao.
You really sold it with this. Nice touch.

Sayonara.