Thread 18503093

Who actually makes great jeans aside from Levi's?

Hugo Boss and Versace.

>>18503093 (OP)
Autistic Japs
Asket are great for a more affordable option
Levi's are only good if they're vintage

>Jeans
Don't waste your money unless you do manual labour regularly. Dress pants are infinitely more comfy, cheaper, and look better.

stop spamming this everywhere

>>18503093 (OP)
Sydney sweeney fucks old japanese asian men

>aside from Levi's
Everyone.

>>18503140
Dress pants are not cheaper than Levi's jeans, unless you're buying polyester plastic slop. Good dress pants are either made of wool or cotton/linen.

>>18503340
Here's one in linen cotton blend and it costs pretty much as much as Levis.

For the price, Abercrombie vintage straight and loose fit are pretty good.

>>18503093 (OP)
In my experience Levis are not good jeans. I'll get a couple pairs in the same measurements, same cut, and they'll fit widely different, one skin tight and another super baggy.

>>18503093 (OP)
Kirkland Signature.

>>18503093 (OP)
Why can't this bitch open her eyes?

I got iron heart 634s and I love them

>>18503093 (OP)
autistic japs and vintage (pre early to mid 1970s)

>>18503140
good jeans last forever other pants do not have that going on for them.

>>18503340
>polyester bullshit that pills in 2 washes

>>18503342
jeetwear.

>>18503340
>>18503342
Nobody wants fashion advice from an incel who buys clothes from Amazon.
Seriously, man.

>>18503093 (OP)
>aside from Levi's
levis is well known to make some of the worst jeans out there with basically zero quality control. sizing all over the place, sewn together by sweatshop slaves, stretch bullshit in everything
and the company is extremely liberal and preachy. there is no reason to give them any money

>>18503093 (OP)
for me, it's autistic japanese reproductions of jeans from the 50s

>>18504167
They are jeans, though. That is what he is saying.
Chinks and Slavs used to give a weeks pay for them.

>>18503093 (OP)
I like Italian made Diesel jeans

>>18503093 (OP)
nudies

>>18504152
>>18504157
That's the point illiterate, retards. Good dress pants are expensive. The only dress pants you can buy for less than the price of jeans is polyester slop.
>jeetwear
Filthy Amerigolem. Dress pants are European clothes. Jeans were invented for literal American peasants, miners and construction workers.

>>18503093 (OP)
stop posting this racist nazi fascist bigot. she wants to force folx with uteruses to birth more sufferers

>>18504200
>It costs more so it's better
LMAO.

>18504245
imagine talking to a guy about fashion and he pulls out a quote from a mf looking like this LMAOOOOOOO

Are small amounts of polyester blend acceptable in jeans? Say, 1-5%

>>18503093 (OP)
Uniqlo jeans are 100% cotton and inexpensive. I can vouch for the JW Anderson x Uniqlo straight jeans specifically.

more importantly, who is selling jeans that don't ride up? im constantly having to pull mine down

>>18504956
personally, no

>>18504956
no amount of poly is acceptable

Seeing a lot of Euro tourists in Pepe Jeans stuff, are they based or cringe?

>>18505373
>bottle blondes
>best genes
????

>>18504398
Cope, untermensch. The National Socialist German Workers' Party was well known for its great fashion sense. Even today most people who know anything about fashion won't deny it, even leftoids.

>>18504956
No. Wear proper 100% cotton jeans. What are you a 3rd world poorfag? 100% cotton jeans aren't even expensive.

>>18503093 (OP)
Wrangler is the only mall brand that makes good jeans, and they don’t sell the good 13mwz in malls.

>>18505680
What an ugly soldier.

>>18505680
>...fascism tends towards an aestheticization of politics, in the sense of a spectacle in which it allows the masses to express themselves without seeing their rights recognized, and without affecting the relations of ownership which the proletarian masses aim to eliminate.
it's been like 90 years and retards still associate themselves with this retarded ideology because cool uniform lmao

>>18505680
>Everyone dresses the same, but 85 years later it is considered aesthetic by political loons
Same can be said about Maoists in the 60s. But the ultimate problem is a uniform is anti-fashion. You're not expressing yourself, you're coping for a lack of ability to express yourself.
That's ultimately what political nutjobs cling onto the political fringes for, you don't have the personality to be anything but a Nazi or Communist, you need a cookie cutter set of beliefs and tastes to be anything but a blank slate.
Fashion is ultimately liberal, because it's simply about expressing yourself in a society where that's allowed.
You don't have the personality to dress yourself.

>>18506424
That's just a methed out junkie. I see them all the time.

>>18504182
The jeans chinks and slaves saved up for are very different from the trash made today

>>18504956
Please stop wearing plastic clothes

>>18506493
There is no such thing as "yourself". You may think you're a special little snowflake and god's gift to the universe, but any outfit you can come up with is already being worn by tens of thousands of people. Which is why trends, subcultures, cliques, organizations etc exist in the first place. They bring together like minded people and they're all wearing uniforms reflect their represent their personality, mindset and ideology.

>>18506493
There is no such thing as "yourself". You may think you're a special little snowflake and god's gift to the universe, but any outfit you can come up with is already being worn by tens of thousands of people. Which is why trends, subcultures, cliques, organizations etc exist in the first place. They bring together like minded people and they're all wearing uniforms that reflect their personality, mindset, worldview and ideology.

>>18503140
I'm gonna assume you mean slacks. Under which I'm including chinos and khakis.

You can get a solid pair of chinos for like $25.

>>18504157
Lmao nothing says autistic virgin like calling everybody disagrees with you an incel.

>>18506658
>pic
everyone discusses the denim, but the never mention how they all have the same hairstyle

>>18506658
>any outfit you can come up with is already being worn by tens of thousands of people.
never met anyone else who wears picrel and that's good enough for me

>>18503093 (OP)
Neighborhood used to. Maybe you could buy some of the older stuff.

levi’s hasnt made great jeans this side of the century

>>18506658
>>18506927
I wonder if they discuss about their denim at all.

>>18507387
>discuss about
good morning sir

>>18506927
That's the only hairstyle women know these days. It's either that or a ponytail when they go to the gym to do squats for 2 hours.

>>18508841
>>18506927
>long hair bad
okay?

>>18505680
post any fit please

>>18508846
Who said anything about long hair? If anything long hair give you unlimited possibilities for hairstyles. But instead all femoids do is leave them loose like whores and call it a day. When was the last time you saw a woman even with a basic braid?

>>18508850
>loose like whores
there's nothing wrong and definitely nothing whorish about that
>even with a basic braid
they look ugly though

>>18508853
Loose hair are dumb and impractical. No civilized woman used to let her hair loose. You see this degeneracy only in modern times. Modern women don't do their hair, nor wear any hair ornaments. Just let them loose, like a witch, or a whore sprawling in a whorehouse.
>they look ugly though
You not being used to seeing them doesn't make them ugly.

>>18508857
>used to
>degeneracy
>only in modern times
yeah it's you again, retard

>>18508860
Who?

>>18503093 (OP)

GUESS used to be the absolute top of the line for normies, and still makes some non-polyshit jeans, but you have to look for them. For more $$$, there's 7FAM, Robert Graham, Naked and Famous, etc...

>>18503140

Disgusting take from an obese faggot who probably wears plastic slop. HEY FATTY, HIT THE FUCKING GYM!

>>18508936
guess? isn't that the company that makes handbags for highschool girls who can't afford actual designer stuff?

>>18508948
No that's Juicy Couture

>>18504245
lol is that an actual quote? Seems kind of off for the times there were racial lines and tensions at the time but the country was hardly 50/50 Jew and negro subverted in the 40s.

>>18509223
A country founded on capitalistic greed and consoomption is judaized from the beginning. People always noticed how overly animated, emotionally driven and prone to violence Americans were, just like their negroes.

>>18504956
No, but 1-2%~ elastine/spanex is ok I guess.

>>18507161
Pretty much, no-one makes them outside of Mexico/Asia anymore.

Picrel these are great, but old.
It's sad what has happened to many of the good jeans, you can't buy new jeans that aren't garbage anymore.

And no Sydney Sweeney does not have great jeans.

D&G, to be factual

>>18503093 (OP)
I’m going to burst a lot of jean autists bubbles here, but the truth is that there is a ton of great cheap jean brands. You don’t need to drop 500 dollars on handmade jap jeans when you can get 40 or 50 dollar Wrangler, Lee, American Eagle, or Levi’s that will hold up just as well and look great. My go to jeans are Levi’s 505s and Wrangler Five Star jeans. 505s were 40 bucks and Five Stars were 25 bucks. Cheap and reliable, just as jeans were intended to be. Hell, I even have a pair of tractor supply jeans that I use for work that look and feel good on me. Can’t go wrong with most brands.

>>18503140
While I disagree on the cheaper part and agree with everything else, nobody, even on /fa/, is gonna wear dress pants everyday

>>18503093 (OP)
>aside from Levi's
maximum KEK

>>18511232
99% of mall brands fit like shit, including Levi's.

>>18504398
its just the dude who thinks he is redpilling the board by telling everyone to weat khakis and polos

>>18511557
>it fits like shit
For who? People are different shapes and sizes. It's retarded to say that a brand as a whole universally fits like shit.

>>18503093 (OP)
>levi's
>great
the bars have never been lower

>>18511817
NTA but most mall brand jeans these days are made for wide hipped soiboys and are designed to be sagged like nigger pants.

>>18503093 (OP)
Uniqlo

>>18511560
Khakis is better than jeans

>>18511560
>t.

>>18508857
>rare gene falsification
Miss me with fake redheads and fake blondes

>>18512282
>Miss me with fake redheads and fake blondes
We should make it illegal to dye ones hair.

>>18506658
Fuck I miss Tuscaloosa. Many good times at and around that corner.

>>18503093 (OP)
levis suck and you're a cuck if you think they're good.

buy big johns or studio dartisan or samurai or something. bring back the 2010 obsession

>>18503093 (OP)
what jeans are good to buy when you've moved past the need for crappy levi's, but haven't taken the selvedge japanesepill or are not chinkmaxxing on rakuten?
is there a better manufacturer at a comparable price to levi's for an average joe such as myself?

>>18512825
Wrangler and Lee. Much better quality than Levi's slop.

>>18503949
Because she is high on drugs and cock.

>>18512831
Wranglers are more comfortable than Levi’s by far in my experience. Wrangler’s Five Star jeans are my go to usually. They are cheap, good quality, and comfortable. I like my Levi 505s, but I usually go with what is most comfortable so I go with the Wranglers.

>>18511232
Its stupid to not go with the nicer option for jeans when you will literally wear them 1000+ times. In terms of cost per wear even €350 iron hearts will be the cheapest thing in your closet.

>>18513553
People just don't get it. The same people buy a cheap bed despite spending a third of their life on it.

>>18513553
Cost per wear is a retarded argument to make in favor of expensive selvedge Japanese jeans thougheverbeitly. For starters almost all of them except IH use cotton thread and will therefore last less than cheap mall brand jeans; and second the durability delta isn't that big, it's not like Wrangler's will melt in your hand or IH are slash proof or anything like that, and for the price of a single pair of IHs you can buy enough Wrangler's to last you a lifetime and still have money left over.

>>18513553
Im not paying 350 dollars for jeans made for autists when I can buy a comparable pair for 60 dollars. I guarantee you that a pair of 350 dollar jap jeans won’t last much longer than a good pair of Levi’s or Wranglers.

>>18513656
Yeah, Japanese denim are more like "artisan" products. You aren't really paying for a superior product but for the antique manufacturing process.

>>18503093 (OP)
As a brown man i approve white womens genes

>>18512825
uniqlo

>>18514207
Do you recommend a specific pair from Uniqlo?

>>18503093 (OP)
Wranglers for new jeans

Levi's and Lees for vintage/thrift stores find

>>18505373
>literally all dye blondes
>best genes

>>18503093 (OP)
I wear levi because i am trying to blend in
I used to wear diesel and g star

I wear levis because I have a 40% discount for working with the company.

>>18503093 (OP)
Levi's are overpriced garbage, even cheap cowboy wranglers made in beaner land are better.

The only real answer is autistic spazmoid jap jeans like stated earlier on this thread

>>18505373
They are all fake blondes, falsifying their genes.

>>18513472
Costco has had their own line of cheap Wranglers lately and IMO they're quite a bit nicer than Five Stars for only a little bit more money. I ride a tall motorcycle and ripped the crotch open on multiple pairs of Five Stars getting on it but the Costco Wranglers have held up decently. (Before somebody says it, btw, I wear armored overpants on top of the jeans when riding, I'm fully aware that denim will evaporate instantly in a slide.)

>>18503093 (OP)
>Who actually makes great jeans aside from Levi's?
Jews.

>>18503093 (OP)
Wrangler is the only consumer denim brand still worth a damn. Everything else is either ultra cheap stretchy dogshit like store brand Arizona, overpriced badly made dogshit like Levi's, or ultra premium overkill from selvedge companies

>>18514793
what's the fit like? Relaxed, straight leg, slim? I love the quality of Costco clothes but beyond their plain white tees everything they have is obnoxious dad fits

>>18514793
If you're ripping your pants just from trying to get on your bike, then you need to stop wearing tight jeans like a woman. Wear straight leg jeans with a decent rise, so that there's enough material near the crotch so that your pants aren't bursting from the seams, and the same points on the tightly stretched out fabric aren't getting all the friction.

>>18503093 (OP)
I like my Cucinelli with fly with buttons

God she's radiating sexuality

>>18514844
I have light and dark wash pairs, the dark ones are straight, the light are semi-relaxed.

>>18514859
They're not tight, a lot of cheap jeans are just shit quality and can't handle any kind of stretch in the crotch, which is unavoidable unless you get ones that are specifically gusseted or whatever. It's not even the seams that rip either, it's the fabric next to them. Higher rise is also counterproductive for me, I have a low natural waist so anything high rise just falls down and the crotch ends up halfway to my knees where it's even more of a problem.

I should also point out that I'm not riding a low bike that you can just step over like your pic, my bike's seat is 35" and I have a 32" inseam, so it's a big karate kick leg swing to get over it, even if I do the "cowboy mount." (Stepping up on the footpeg first.) I really just need to get some dedicated riding pants that aren't overpants but they're expensive as fuck and I'm trying to lose some weight before I spend the money.

>>18503093 (OP)
I like that carhart material better whatever it’s called but it doesn’t itch like jeans

>>18516704
Duck canvas?

Back in the 2010s, River Island from the UK. Had a pair that lasted 10 years. They were a dark caramel brown with black acid wash.

t. American

>>18516704
Why would jeans itch? Stop buying garbage

>>18516723
Because he buys polyester filled garbage. 100% or even 98% cotton jeans don't itch.

>>18516711
Correct

>>18503093 (OP)
CoSMICS.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rEAPc-7R2Y

>>18503093 (OP)
Praise the Lord
Praise the Lord as he came as brown Jesus on earth

I love white women so much

The pinnacle of beauty on earth.

>>18517783
because nigs are prone to violence. why would you say anything to someone who you think will try to kill you for calling them a word?
if anything, it's a lesson about concealed carry

>>18517802
>prone to violence
men in general are
white men are just too weak and submissive to actually stand their ground

>>18517808
yeah most whites are fat cucks these days. that's why you get a gun

>>18517810
icl i don't really care because she's ugly as sin. also I'm not really interested in women who are into nigs. I was more commenting on the post above the image.

>>18514285
I bought a new pair of Lee’s the other week and they are my new favorite pair of jeans. The construction of the jeans seems improved when compared to what Lee put out ten years ago. They are comfortable and seem durable so far. They are 99 percent cotton and 1 percent spandex so they have a bit of stretch which I enjoy.

>>18506658
We're talking about people, women aren't people. Women are proven to have less in-group variance in personality than men. Men are individuals, women are a herd.

>>18508853
There's definitely something wrong with "basic bitch curtains", or it's at least indicative of a lack of individuality.

>>18512831
Do you know if they make fakes of these? I saw selvedge Lee riders on eBay for around $50. Seller is from China, but the tag says they're made in another country.

>>18518100
Which line did you get, the legendary line? I got a pair of their MVP jeans and two of their bottom tier walmart jeans. They don't seem super different, but the MVPs use some kind of sturdier seam/stitching on the inside.

sugarcane dungarees

>>18520535
Yeah I got the legendary line. Nah man don’t get the Walmart Lee’s. I was at Walmart yesterday and compared the Lee’s there to the ones I bought at the Lee/Wrangler store and they weren’t as good. It is often the case for Walmart products. My Lee Legendary jeans are made in Mexico, the Walmart ones are made in Pakistan and are of less quality it seems.

>>18520767
The walmart ones are still mostly cotton. I think 98 or 99% cotton. They don't seem to be made of thinner material than the MVPs, but they had a flat-felled seam vs overlock on the MVP. I also noticed the walmart ones would get tate ochi fades. I think the walmart ones go on clearance sometimes for dirt cheap, like 50 cents in some places, but I did get mines for full price with gift cards.

Haven't tried any of the legendary jeans yet.

>>18522295
Im not saying they’re bad jeans, Im just saying that the mexico Lees seemed better to me. Cheap jeans are great sometimes. I beat the hell out of walmart jeans while working on the railroad, and they lasted forever. I imagine Lee jeans sold at Walmart are definitely of higher quality than the cheaper ones I had.

>>18511557
nah they are the best $40 bcuks jeans. the 511 are consistent most of the time. but its more to do with the retarded amount of variations within cuts. 511s have like 6 different styles, including a skinny version of the slim fit 511. let that sink in

>>18518100
>muh stretch
Why do you faggots need stretch in your pants? How about wearing normal men's (straight leg) jeans that aren't skintight like women's leggings?

>>18503093 (OP)
How will brown, black, asian women recover from this?

>>18503093 (OP)
Your mom.

>>18522322
It gets repeated a lot but Wrangler's 13MWZ is really the best you can do for cheap, the cut is infinitely better than Levi's because it has maintained the old design when pockets were designed for riding and not for storing your phone.

>>18503093 (OP)
this commercial, her try-hard sultry voice and the fact she is coasting on nothing else than sex appeal, is giga cringe. But liberals acting like this is nazism is insane. Its basic white girl celeb worship, not the holocaust.

>>18522730
Agreed, I wore 501’s for years until I finally discovered the 13MWZ. Not to mention that the denim is heavier weight too. Wrangler is basically what Levi’s used to be before they became more of a fashion brand.