>>18505125
Damn. I've seen people unironically wear shorts that long. Shorts that are even longer than mid-calf, about 3/4 calf coverage, only like 2-3 inches away from being full length pants, basically touching your socks, etc. There was a time period back in like the 90s/early 2000s where literally everyone wore shorts that long, even the girls. Show a few more inches of calf beyond the accepted you'd be a faggot. Don't even think about showing knees or even worse *gasps* thighs!
At that point I have to wonder though...what's the point of calling them "shorts" if they're basically the same length as pants anyway?
