>>18513230
>there is no evidence that people who wear sexcore have more sex
This is obviously a difficult subject to investigate, though there's plenty of anecdotal evidence suggesting there is a correlation, not lastly the name sexcore.
>most millennials wouldn't be sexless incels
Millennials don't have any less sex than previous generations, see
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2
or just do a quick online search.
>more boomers and gen x are married compared to millennials
I won't bother looking that up to confirm it, but even if it was the case it would stand to reason, since boomers and gen x are older than millennials.
>millennials are weird homos
>until the late 2000s people didn't wear skin tight clothes because [...]
The preoccupation with not looking gay is actually quite millennial itself, and previous generations had no problem dressing in slim fit clothing, even though it was flashy.
Just skim through an episode of Miami Vice, watch Saturday Night Fever, a music video from the Bee Gees.
Even the drape cut suit was a slim cut.
>they're fucking uncomfortable
Ever tried a pair of leggings?
The kind people use for running and working out when it's cold outside.
They're comfortable.
What about a good quality slim fit shirt?
I have one from D&G that's pretty comfortable.
Are you not confusing slim fit with one or two sizes too small?
>clothes are supposed to fit the way I like it
That depends on personal taste, culture and period.
>nobody wants to see the shape of your body, it's disgusting and ugly
>showing your body is stupid, boring and unimaginative
Do you see how this sounds like you're generalizing the way you think people feel about you?
If it's not true, the way to prove it beyond a shadow of doubt is to post a fit pic.
>there's nowhere you can go with it beyond that besides complete nudity
Is the fact that you can very well dress like a hot air balloon the reason why loose fit is better than anything else?
