Thread 18515526

Unless you're 6ft+, wearing baggy pants will make you look even shorter.

>>18515526 (OP)
What is wrong with slim pants? WHAT IS WRONG WITH SLIM PANTS??!? Like wow.

nothing is wrong with slim fit, in fact, it they're a classic staple in fashion since the 1960s. Zoomers just wanted to differentiate themselves from millennials so much they went full retard on the baggyness and called everything that didn't have tree trunks for legs "skinny jeans". I'm glad zommer baggy fashion is becoming recognized for the cringy shit it is.

>>18515526 (OP)
The only men who should wear slim pants are SLIM men. If you're a fatfuck or have gymcel with ham thighs, then stick to straight leg and relaxed fit pants, or else you'll look like a woman.

>>18515526 (OP)
The only men who should wear slim pants are SLIM men. If you're a fatfuck or a gymcel with ham thighs, then stick to straight leg and relaxed fit pants, or else you'll look like a woman.

Kys faggot

>>18515533
millenials wore SKINNY pants, which are not the same as slim fit

>>18515526 (OP)
they are ugly. make you look like you have small chicken legs.

i dont see that many people wearing baggy clothes. this feels like fake outrage

>>18515553
he looked like that because he was poor and working class and, crazy I know, worked in some fucking mine or shit. This was mass produced garbage of its day. It was the same shit with soviet uniforms, all baggy, ugly and shapeless, while nazis from to to bottom dressed sharp and stood the test of time.

>>18515559

men are supposed to have slim legs, not beefy thighs like a 40 year old soccer mom.

>>18515562
That's not baggy, you millennial faggot. That's what normal pants look like. Your skinny jeans and millennial tapered pants are gay. Also, WTF are you talking about? Nazis never wore slim pants.

>>18515564
clothes are not meant to hug your skin anon

>>18515562
His outfit is based because of the proportions. you will never be a nazi just a wannabe clone

Men can and should still wear trousers with an 8 inch leg opening

Big baggy 90s jeans are for teen girls

>>18515533
This. Being slim and wearing fitted clothes will always be timeless. People are gonna look back at the baggy trend and cringe just like everyone else did when they look back at the early 2000s.

>>18515697
>>18515647
Skinny jeans are for fags

>>18515814
Slim isn't skinny, you moron. You're most likely just fat and have wide legs so anything slim is skin tight on you.

>>18515896
Skinny jeans are for fags

Generally slim cuts make you look slightly homosexual, and they limit the available mobility in the crotch area which renders the pants/jeans as less functional. If you’re looking for the most “timeless” cut or silhouette, the answer is not to overcompensate with bagginness like the zoomers, but to have a balanced straight/relaxed cut. Relaxed does not mean baggy. The goal is to have looseness in the leg so that your pants are actually functional and not restrictive, and so that the hem opening isn’t so tight that it proportionally makes you look like you have huge feet.

>>18515567
Nta but the nazis definitely wore slim pants when not in combat dress. Hitler himself can be seen essentially wearing skinny fit pants below the thigh

I was watching The Birdcage, and thought Robin Williams' costumes were pretty nice. He's a short guy wearing quite wide-legged trousers, but the whole effect is quite flattering. I think slim and skinny fit can have the opposite of the intended effect depending on how it's balanced with the upper body

>>18515901
Those aren't slim pants. They look "slim" because they're stuffed inside their knee high boots.

>>18515901
Those aren't slim pants. They look "slim" because they're stuffed inside their knee high boots.

>>18515898
Wholeheartedly agree

>>18515899
Autistic black and white thinking does not allow them to see outside of ‘Millenial skin tight vs zoomer comically oversized’

>>18516123
NTA but why don't people just wear normal ass pants these anymore? It's either skintight fag pants or baggy garbage bag hobo pants.

>>18516123
>>18516144
Because millennials and zoomers are both retarded in their own way. Like anon said, it’s the black and white mentality that makes them both look like clowns. Just buy some vintage 501 cuts, it is arguably what looks the best and will never go out of style

>>18516034
yes they are they just have some weird bellowing thing going on at the thigh

these are like those skinny jean sweatpants things that people wore a couple years ago

>>18516262
Those are Jodhpur pants meant for horse riding. Not sure they're the same pants that the Nazis wore.

>>18516267
m32 dress pants actually, the ones the SS wore

>>18515526 (OP)
>only two cuts of pants exist, slim fit and loose, what the fuck is straight fit and regular fit
>>18515553

>>18516262
>>18516276
Those were used because they were easier to wear with boots, while still having a wide roomy fit in the thighs and hips. Not because they wanted a slim fit look below the knees. They were a practical piece of clothing. Unlike modern slim fit and skinny pants that make no sense because they're really uncomfortable to wear and look feminine on most men.

>>18516289
There's nothing modern about skinny fitting pants. They were the status quo forever as soon as we ditched the Greek and Roman robes. Pants only got larger with the advent of mass production, and eventually purposely as rebellion with inner city black gang bangers. Poverty is what they exude essentially, modern day peasantry.

>>18515526 (OP)
>wearing baggy pants will make you look even shorter.
You retard?

>>18516144
Because normal pants are bland and depressing

>>18515814
>8 inch leg opening is "skinny jeans"
yeah you're obese lol, obese people can never be effay

>>18515526 (OP)
zoombesity ain't it

>>18515526 (OP)
~75% of the American population is overweight/obese, thus wearing slim jeans (or jeans of any size for that matter) looks hideous. In fact no matter WHAT most Americans wear they will look hideous, because they are hideous to begin with.

>>18515526 (OP)
This chick I know gave me pair almost like those, bought from a thrift store for about $1.50. Uncomfortable as fuck, and look like trash compared to any of my 90s specimens.

>>18517442
It doesn't work like that at all, no matter how slender you are.

>>18516144
Any advice on buying normal-fitting pants for guys with large thighs? Nearly everything I have either shrink-wraps to my legs or could fit an extra person with how much extra waist it has.