← Home ← Back to /fa/

Thread 18516633

32 posts 14 images /fa/
Anonymous No.18516633 >>18516706 >>18516742 >>18516748 >>18519605 >>18520454
twee is coming back this fall
Anonymous No.18516663
I fucking hope not. I hope people realize that wanting to talk to girls about philosophy in a coffee shop is some cringe Hollywood fantasy for introvert geeks.
Anonymous No.18516706 >>18516721 >>18516730
>>18516633 (OP)
All of that slim fit bullshit is from 2009-2012. Nobody dressed like that in the early to late 2000s.
Anonymous No.18516721 >>18516730 >>18518930 >>18520924
>>18516706
Yeah the dates are way too early. This was probably made by some out of touch Gen X fag into Parkway Drive.
Anonymous No.18516730 >>18516735
>>18516706
>>18516721
flyover laggards detected
Anonymous No.18516735 >>18517022
>>18516730
Wrong
Anonymous No.18516742
>>18516633 (OP)
white peeppo all look the same
Anonymous No.18516748 >>18519820
>>18516633 (OP)
>millennial "fashion"
embarrassing
Anonymous No.18517022
>>18516735
correct they're wrong. the chart even shows it.
Anonymous No.18518930 >>18518932 >>18518935 >>18518936 >>18518995 >>18519125
>>18516721
Wrong. Emos and Hipsters were wearing slim in 2002 and 2003. They just wore girls pants. View this music video from 2002. https://youtu.be/GHCI4DEXHE4?si=1vekr_WqScyuLJWe
Anonymous No.18518932 >>18518933 >>18518935 >>18518995
>>18518930
And view finch live in 2003. https://youtu.be/ZxZqVT7NQ08?si=0jOI_RoVQNwCg5KK
Anonymous No.18518933 >>18518935 >>18518937 >>18523062
>>18518932
The strokes in 200. Op picture is correct. If it's not correct for you, then you didn't live anywhere with cool people.
Anonymous No.18518935 >>18518995
>>18518930
>>18518932
>>18518933
Midwest emo isn’t emo.
Anonymous No.18518936
>>18518930
Kino
Anonymous No.18518937
>>18518933
Man I was a teenager at this time and I couldn't for the life of me find slim pants like this. Although all I had was the mall back then. All I could do was squeeze my ass into pants that were 3 sizes too small and hope for the best.
Anonymous No.18518995 >>18518999 >>18519125
>>18518930
>>18518932
>>18518935
magazine article from 2002. this is emo. hot topic "emo" (my chemical romance, "scene" bands, etc) however is objectively not emo
Anonymous No.18518999 >>18519125 >>18519126
>>18518995
Emo is used very broadly. This was also emo in the early 2000s
Anonymous No.18519125 >>18519743
>>18518995
>>18518999
Neither of those have slim fit pants. And the second one isn't even fucking emo. It's basic ass clothes every guy in the world used to wear in the early to mid 2000s, from the first world to third world. Slim fit emo and hipster bullshit is from the 2010s.
>>18518930
The faggots in that video are only wearing slim shirts, not jeans. And their jeans are regular men's bootcut jeans that were the default jeans every guy wore from like 2001-2007. They aren't women's jeans.
Anonymous No.18519126 >>18519171
>>18518999
this is indie
Anonymous No.18519171
>>18519126
That's Daphne loves derby
Anonymous No.18519605 >>18519664
>>18516633 (OP)
when did the term hipster fall out of fashion
isn't this literally the same genre they call "performative male"?
with a mustache and mullet and tote bag and feminist literature?
Anonymous No.18519664
>>18519605
>when did the term hipster fall out of fashion
It became dynonimous with lumbersexual, so around the tine they disappeared.
>isn't this literally the same genre they call "performative male"?
Yeah, that'd be the modern incarnation.
The term hipster has exisyed since at least the 60s (maybe even before). And while the peculiarities of the hipster change over time, the core is the same.
So yeah, maybe the performative males are the new incarnation of the hipster.
Anonymous No.18519743 >>18520446
>>18519125
okay but you said nobody worw slim fits in the 2000s and the dates were wrong... when the image is from the 2000s. like I get you're flyover but
Anonymous No.18519820 >>18520455 >>18520459
>>18516748
What's wrong with it?
Anonymous No.18520446 >>18523075
>>18519743
NTA but old enough, been there, done that, etc. What I remmember:
>late 90's-early 00's
Baggy and loose pants were the norm. Cargo pants were all the hot stuff
>mid 00's-early 10's
Bootcut jeans were the main trend
>10's to a couple years ago
Slim and skinny cuts dominate.

As a side note, the emos, scenersters and the like originally wore skinny girl pants because there were no skinnies for men. Eventually their influence went mainstream and are partially rrsponsible for the decade and a half of slim and skinny cuts being the main trend.
Anonymous No.18520454
>>18516633 (OP)
>The Ashton
TAKE ME BACK

Yes I'm that old, deal with it
Anonymous No.18520455 >>18520459
>>18519820
It's gay. Those look like women's tops. Just like how early emo skinny jeans were literally women's jeans that emo faggots wore by shopping in the teenage girls' section.
Anonymous No.18520459
>>18519820
>>18520455
it's so bad is almost good
Anonymous No.18520924
>>18516721
it really was that long ago gramps
Anonymous No.18523062 >>18523065
>>18518933
They look like dorks nothing looks genuine
Anonymous No.18523065
>>18523062
Doesn't matter. They are as famous as can be and wore skinny jeans.
Anonymous No.18523075
>>18520446
This guy gets it. Late 90s and early 2000s had baggy jeans from JC Penny with brands like South Pole and JNCO (not the raver jeans) Early 2000s were mostly bootcut and slim fit jeans. Skinny jeans were just emo kids borrowing girl jeans. It wasn’t until like 2009 did Hot Topic start selling skinny jeans in the boy’s section. After that, they were 100% mainstream and no longer part of an alt subculture because of hipster.